deficiences in other churches

  • Thread starter Thread starter achristiantoo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
deficiencies…
How about being started 1500 years after Christ established the universal one?
This is also a difference in understanding. I think most mainline protestant churches those that grew out of the Reformation would say that we separated from the Roman Catholic Church at that time but that our founding was still with Christ. I agree that there is a fine line but that’s how Anglicans in particular view ourselves.
 
One thing is the penitential prayer/rite…pasted below…

I confess to almighty God,
and to you, my brothers and sisters,
that I have sinned through my own fault,
in my thoughts and in my words,
in what I have done,
and in what I have failed to do;
and I ask blessed Mary, ever virgin, <-----This part is not necessary
all the angels and saints, <-----This part is not necessary either
and you, my brothers and sisters,
to pray for me to the Lord, our God amen .

I’ve never heard anything like this in any non catholic churches I’ve been to. It’s a very good thing for a large group of people to publicly acknowledge/confess their sins. It’s sets up a correct perspective of oneself before God, verbally recognizes ourselves as sinners in need of forgiveness and it’s Biblical.

I know that non catholics all understand these things but this prayer keeps that knowledge more at the forefront of our brains. It keeps us more humble before God and I think it’s one of the reasons I never hear a catholic say in reference to their sin…“it doesn’t matter because I’m already forgiven.”

Catholics just try harder not to sin, and I believe this prayer is part of the reason for that.
Well that and the Act of Contrition which relate directly to communion and confession. But your right. Here to is a Gift from God, when used as taught it will lead you to stop sinning. You will either stop going to confession, or you will stop sinning.

Of course being human we are always going to be subjected to sin in the venial state. But this a far cry from living out of Grace in a state of mortal sin?

God Bless, Gary
 
This is also a difference in understanding. I think most mainline protestant churches those that grew out of the Reformation would say that we separated from the Roman Catholic Church at that time but that our founding was still with Christ. I agree that there is a fine line but that’s how Anglicans in particular view ourselves.
it is a fine line, and most of my discussions with protestants are with those who aren’t “high church” types, I am ill prepared to discuss differences with Anglicanism, but I imagine that the original poster is not a high church type of protestant.
 
This is also a difference in understanding. I think most mainline protestant churches those that grew out of the Reformation would say that we separated from the Roman Catholic Church at that time but that our founding was still with Christ. I agree that there is a fine line but that’s how Anglicans in particular view ourselves.
Regardess how one views themselves, the only situation we have to look at is the predominatly Protestant countrys such as the USA to see how well the protestant faith has served God in 500 years? This is not a shining example for the Protestant Faith. So what country is?

This is why you now see the examination of the Catholic Church again. Satan is one tricky fellow, he has had his way for some time now. The 1900’s bought about modern man a new type of modern church thinking. Today we see the failure in that. In 2000 the sexual assault on Gods Church and denial of the BVM. And each failure and test costs us many Souls to satan. We can’t afford the price anymore. We need to get back to business, and Gods business is saving Souls in His church. Satans is corrupting and stealing them. Hows the USA and West doing? Whos winning here satan or God?

Now we have Islam coming on strong. The West must get its act together now, or it will suffer the consequence. God is not allowing this, he has been patient with it. Lets not confuse the two. Last month bought over 525 twisters in this country, never seen in recorded History. You now have muslim tolerating Christians in a Christain country?

Its time to get our act together. We now have Protestant Faiths called Christian which are abominations and a mock to the word Christian, some don’t believe Christ is God, some call the Pope the Antichrist and the Mystical Body of Jesus Christ an Apostasy. Here you see satan at work. Its a lie and it won’t live.

Its time to go back to the Ancient Path, and acknowledge Gods Church. Then and only then will man find Peace and eternal life. There’s not many paths to God, there’s one and we teach it right here. Just has Christ taught us 2000 years ago. The only aspect thats changed is the face’s.

God Bless, Gary
 
Regardess how one views themselves, the only situation we have to look at is the predominatly Protestant countrys such as the USA to see how well the protestant faith has served God in 500 years? This is not a shining example for the Protestant Faith. So what country is?

This is why you now see the examination of the Catholic Church again. Satan is one tricky fellow, he has had his way for some time now. The 1900’s bought about modern man a new type of modern church thinking. Today we see the failure in that. In 2000 the sexual assault on Gods Church and denial of the BVM. And each failure and test costs us many Souls to satan. We can’t afford the price anymore. We need to get back to business, and Gods business is saving Souls in His church. Satans is corrupting and stealing them. Hows the USA and West doing? Whos winning here satan or God?

Now we have Islam coming on strong. The West must get its act together now, or it will suffer the consequence. God is not allowing this, he has been patient with it. Lets not confuse the two. Last month bought over 525 twisters in this country, never seen in recorded History. You now have muslim tolerating Christians in a Christain country?

Its time to get our act together. We now have Protestant Faiths called Christian which are abominations and a mock to the word Christian, some don’t believe Christ is God, some call the Pope the Antichrist and the Mystical Body of Jesus Christ an Apostasy. Here you see satan at work. Its a lie and it won’t live.

Its time to go back to the Ancient Path, and acknowledge Gods Church. Then and only then will man find Peace and eternal life. There’s not many paths to God, there’s one and we teach it right here. Just has Christ taught us 2000 years ago. The only aspect thats changed is the face’s.

God Bless, Gary
Gary,
I’m so sad that you would so denigrate your Protestant sisters and brothers. These sorts of comments are not in the least bit helpful. Do some do as you say yes, but please don’t paint us with such a broad brush.
 
One thing is the penitential prayer/rite…pasted below…

I confess to almighty God,
and to you, my brothers and sisters,
that I have sinned through my own fault,
in my thoughts and in my words,
in what I have done,
and in what I have failed to do;
and I ask blessed Mary, ever virgin, <-----This part is not necessary
all the angels and saints, <-----This part is not necessary either
and you, my brothers and sisters,
to pray for me to the Lord, our God amen .

I’ve never heard anything like this in any non catholic churches I’ve been to. It’s a very good thing for a large group of people to publicly acknowledge/confess their sins. It’s sets up a correct perspective of oneself before God, verbally recognizes ourselves as sinners in need of forgiveness and it’s Biblical.

I know that non catholics all understand these things but this prayer keeps that knowledge more at the forefront of our brains. It keeps us more humble before God and I think it’s one of the reasons I never hear a catholic say in reference to their sin…“it doesn’t matter because I’m already forgiven.”

Catholics just try harder not to sin, and I believe this prayer is part of the reason for that.
Anglican Holy Eucharist contains a penetenial rite, see below from the current Episcopal BCP:

Most merciful God,
we confess that we have sinned against you
in thought, word, and deed,
by what we have done,
and by what we have left undone.
We have not loved you with our whole heart;
we have not loved our neighbors as ourselves.
We are truly sorry and we humbly repent.
For the sake of your Son Jesus Christ,
have mercy on us and forgive us;
that we may delight in your will,
and walk in your ways,
to the glory of your Name. Amen.
 
Regardess how one views themselves, the only situation we have to look at is the predominatly Protestant countrys such as the USA to see how well the protestant faith has served God in 500 years? This is not a shining example for the Protestant Faith. So what country is?
I don’t think you want to go down that road unless you can establish that predominantly Catholic countries such as France and Italy have a better track record in faith and morality issues.
 
I thank you for your invitation. I know that behind it lies only good intention. The struggles which have gripped Anglicanism further point me towards Anglicanisms true-ness as part of the One church founded by Christ and led initially by the Apostles. Anglicanism does not revel in its completeness but rather it’s incompleteness which brings us to struggle before God to ascertain His truth. I am home my brother.
Worth a shot. 😃
 
QUOTE=achristiantoo;7801914]yes the catholic bible has more books.
bottom line is this, is the teachings of those books necessary for me to know to get to heaven?
I was just thinking about this…

The CC canonized the content of Scriptures in AD 397 or so. This was the Bible that all of Christianity used till someone or a group, in the 1800s or so, decided to remove seven books from the Bible.

So my question to you then would be…Where did the authority to remove the 7 books come from? If the CC was divinely inspired by the HS when it canonized the canon, then where did the divine authority of those in 1800s come from? So, the HS changed its mind in the 1800s and decided those books were not needed anymore?
Thank you Jesus for your Amazing Grace
 
Provenance cannot be a sole guide to truth. Do you also like classical music? Richard Wagner was an undeniably wretched human being, but there is no denying that his music soars and transcends basic human life and reveals something far greater than ourselves. I think you’d find Anglicans that disgree but many would agree that Peter was given the keys. (there’s even a window of Peter at our church and he has the keys in the window) but our understanding is different. I don’t really want to get into that because its been hashed and rehashed to death on this website and its not really worth the energy at this point. :o
I agree that provenance is not a single guide to ascertain that a piece of art is an original, but it is a very good one. Simply because this topic has been “hashed” many times on this web site, does not lessen its importance or value. All Protestant churches will struggle with this issue because it is a real issue. The constant questions will be: “Who created my church?” “Did the founder of my church claim direction from God to create it?” “Does God approve of all these churches?” “Is there value in in all people belonging to one faith, one baptism, and one Church?”

Anglicans have a more difficult time of answering these questions comfortably because the founding of their church came from tawdry reasoning of King Henry VIII. This will always be a problem that cannot be buried, put away, or forgotten.

Does this reasoning above mean there is not beauty, faith, and holiness found among Anglican members? God forbid, Anglicans seek after Jesus the Christ, the Son of God and love him. How can anyone deny that or discredit our brothers and sisters. Would that we should cut off our own hand than sling such arrows. However, personal faith is different than one’s church. Eventually, the Savior said a bitter tree cannot create good fruit. Eventually the fruit goes bad and reverts to the bitterness of the wild root. This is evident in Anglicanism today. American Anglicanism as a whole wanders in darkness; calling dark, light and truth, lies.

Take all the wonderful truths you find in your church, discard the bad, and then when lead by the Holy Spirit, come home. Until then, may you always walk in the Light.
 
to: achristiantoo
re: those missing 7 books in “your” Bible .

I don’t think you take this difference very seriously . Those 7 missing books are from the Old Testament , a.k. a. the Jewish Bible .The Jewish Bible that Jesus and the Apostles studied , knew and held sacred INCLUDED those very same 7 Books that you and other Protestants reject ! If those 7 books were good enough for Jesus and the Apostles , why aren’t they good enough for you and for other Protestants ? How would you explain to Jesus and the Apostles today why you reject those 7 books ( and let’s not forget the parts of 2 or 3 others Protestants “edited” ) .
The canon of sacred scripture has never changed in the Catholic Church once it was determined .
 
nhylan,
How can Anglicans claim valid Holy Orders when you have women priests and Bishops ? How can a female bishop validly ordain ( i.e., with Apostolic Succession) any priest ? You must know that this situation is driving Anglican priests out of your demonination .
 
It has to do a lot with the lack of keeping the Deposit of Faith, rejecting the traditions and the authority of those who has been given as such by God. Without an authority such as the Magesterium, any Jack and Jane can just take Scripture and bend it to their whim. Now you have a skewed view of the faith. Without traditions, there is no ongoing practice that connects you to the past all the way back to the Apostles.
 
nhylan,
How can Anglicans claim valid Holy Orders when you have women priests and Bishops ? How can a female bishop validly ordain ( i.e., with Apostolic Succession) any priest ? You must know that this situation is driving Anglican priests out of your demonination .
And you are welcome to them. Anglicans can have valid holy orders because sex is not the determining matter of the sacrament. Anyone can be a priest if they are called.
 
nhylan,
Anything you think or believe is not necessarily the truth . Christ came into the world at a specific time and place AND he took human form . The human form he chose was male . Yes , sex ( i.e. , gender ) does matter . Christ was a male , his Apostles were male and Holy Orders was conferred on on males exclusively ! It doesn’t mean men earned it or deserve it , but it is . Sex is destiny , in more ways than one . A female ordination would be no more valid than a Baptism performed with motor oil instead of water . The sacraments have a physial/material form , and these do matter . Holy Orders is not just about the gender of the candidate , but that sex/gender does in fact matter . Why didn’t Christ confer Holy Orders on Mary , His mother , who would have" deserved " it more ? But He didn’t !
Maybe women aren’t called , even when they think they are .
Anglican holy orders aren’t valid , even without female Bishops . At the catholic.com
website’s Faith section , there is an explanation as to why . Early on , the Anglicans changed the rite of ordination .
 
And you are welcome to them. Anglicans can have valid holy orders because sex is not the determining matter of the sacrament. Anyone can be a priest if they are called.
This is not correct, nhylan. Valid Holy orders can only come from Christ, and He has not given the Church the authority to ordain women.

Valid Holy Orders are not dependent upon gender, but upon authority.
 
nhylan,
Anything you think or believe is not necessarily the truth .

Anglican holy orders aren’t valid , even without female Bishops . At the catholic.com
website’s Faith section , there is an explanation as to why . Early on , the Anglicans changed the rite of ordination .
The first sentence is a silly argument, the same could be said of you. The Catholic reasons for Anglican’s having invalid orders are completely, first off, wrong. If you knew anything about the issue besides what Catholic.com says you might not be so swift to discount Anglican orders. There are even Catholics on this site that believe Anglicans do have holy orders. I could continue to argue about female priests but we won’t get anywhere. I can show you all my evidence that says you can have female priests and then you can give me all your evidence to the contrary and we won’t ever convince the other.
 
It has to do a lot with the lack of keeping the Deposit of Faith, rejecting the traditions and the authority of those who has been given as such by God. Without an authority such as the Magesterium, any Jack and Jane can just take Scripture and bend it to their whim. Now you have a skewed view of the faith. Without traditions, there is no ongoing practice that connects you to the past all the way back to the Apostles.
Agree’d…If we view this statement under a critical view, we then see how Sola Scriptura has evolved in many different directions. Its hurting mankind in the civil world without a doubt.

Godd Bless. Gary
 
The first sentence is a silly argument, the same could be said of you. The Catholic reasons for Anglican’s having invalid orders are completely, first off, wrong. If you knew anything about the issue besides what Catholic.com says you might not be so swift to discount Anglican orders. There are even Catholics on this site that believe Anglicans do have holy orders. I could continue to argue about female priests but we won’t get anywhere. I can show you all my evidence that says you can have female priests and then you can give me all your evidence to the contrary and we won’t ever convince the other.
I understand that there are some Anglican bishoprics that may be considered valid. I have not kept up on the dialogues for the reunification, so maybe they are re-commissioning conditionally?

You are right, for us, it is not a matter of our own self interpreted evidence, but a matter that is decided by the Revelation of God, whether it makes sense to our puny rational minds, or not. You will not be able to pursuade Catholics here to abandon what has been handed down to us from the Apostles, so it will just go in circles. We are not at liberty to ignore any part of the seamless garmet that makes up the once for all deposit of faith we have received.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top