C
chuckfrmvalyfrg
Guest
nhylan,
Why is my 1st sentence a silly argument ? Because you can’t defend your own moral relativism ?Even if there are Catholics on this site who believe Anglican Orders are valid , it only proves their error ! That’s right , error ! There are probably Catholics on this site who believe abortion , contraception, and euthanasia are just swell ( moral ) , SO WHAT ? Heterodoxy is still heterodoxy ! You say you can prove Anglican orders are valid , but you actually don’t . I don’t blame you , that’s more heavy lifting that anyone should have to do . When are yoy going to learn that “denial” is an acronym for :
d on’t
e ven
(k)n o(w)
i t’s
a
l ie ?
Anglicanism was flawed from the very beginning and you don’t know how to extricate yourself from that predicament without denying it’s hetrodoxy. I feel your pain . How did Newman respond to your claim ?
Why is my 1st sentence a silly argument ? Because you can’t defend your own moral relativism ?Even if there are Catholics on this site who believe Anglican Orders are valid , it only proves their error ! That’s right , error ! There are probably Catholics on this site who believe abortion , contraception, and euthanasia are just swell ( moral ) , SO WHAT ? Heterodoxy is still heterodoxy ! You say you can prove Anglican orders are valid , but you actually don’t . I don’t blame you , that’s more heavy lifting that anyone should have to do . When are yoy going to learn that “denial” is an acronym for :
d on’t
e ven
(k)n o(w)
i t’s
a
l ie ?
Anglicanism was flawed from the very beginning and you don’t know how to extricate yourself from that predicament without denying it’s hetrodoxy. I feel your pain . How did Newman respond to your claim ?