S
simple_soul
Guest
I have a quick question. Well I hope it’s a quick question. but what is the difference between “absorbed” and “infused”?
I am sorry you feel this way - that discussion of spiritual matters such as this are harmful in any way. St. Teresa told us specifically that having converse with the friends of God is a very good practice. Even in Carmel, we share and discuss these Carmelite saints in our monthly meetings, to better understand our vocation and our saints’ teachings. May God enlighten you.I think I have to back out of these conversations. It really bothers me that the subject of contemplation can quickly devolve into a “science” rather than a relationship. Intimate relationships surpass the human language, which leaves it open to such controversy. I truly believe that such matters are too sacred to be debated. It never does any justice to the relationship. Over analyzing, I have found, never is a benefit when it comes to relationships.
I had the desire to post the statement to bring clarity, because the “new age,” so called, contemplation mimics very closely the desired Contemplation of God and thought the distinction would be very helpful to guard against falling into a trap. I tried to bring a reliable source to the table for the good of all the good willed individuals who earnestly desire deeper relationship.
Master, Lord, King, Almighty God, we praise you for your generous love, kindness, mercy and compassion. Please guard us from all things that bring about confusion, conflict, competition, and discord of any kind. Please, unite us in your love.
From St. Teresa’s “Foundations.”I have a quick question. Well I hope it’s a quick question. but what is the difference between “absorbed” and “infused”?
Yes distinctions are helpful!I think I have to back out of these conversations. It really bothers me that the subject of contemplation can quickly devolve into a “science” rather than a relationship. Intimate relationships surpass the human language, which leaves it open to such controversy. I truly believe that such matters are too sacred to be debated. It never does any justice to the relationship. Over analyzing, I have found, never is a benefit when it comes to relationships.
I had the desire to post the statement to bring clarity, because the “new age,” so called, contemplation mimics very closely the desired Contemplation of God and thought the distinction would be very helpful to guard against falling into a trap. I tried to bring a reliable source to the table for the good of all the good willed individuals who earnestly desire deeper relationship.
And thus break out the disagreements over the use of the term “contemplation”Authentic contemplation
Yes distinctions are helpful!I think I have to back out of these conversations. It really bothers me that the subject of contemplation can quickly devolve into a “science” rather than a relationship. Intimate relationships surpass the human language, which leaves it open to such controversy. I truly believe that such matters are too sacred to be debated. It never does any justice to the relationship. Over analyzing, I have found, never is a benefit when it comes to relationships.
I had the desire to post the statement to bring clarity, because the “new age,” so called, contemplation mimics very closely the desired Contemplation of God and thought the distinction would be very helpful to guard against falling into a trap. I tried to bring a reliable source to the table for the good of all the good willed individuals who earnestly desire deeper relationship.
Amen.I think I have to back out of these conversations. It really bothers me that the subject of contemplation can quickly devolve into a “science” rather than a relationship. Intimate relationships surpass the human language, which leaves it open to such controversy. I truly believe that such matters are too sacred to be debated. It never does any justice to the relationship. Over analyzing, I have found, never is a benefit when it comes to relationships.
I had the desire to post the statement to bring clarity, because the “new age,” so called, contemplation mimics very closely the desired Contemplation of God and thought the distinction would be very helpful to guard against falling into a trap. I tried to bring a reliable source to the table for the good of all the good willed individuals who earnestly desire deeper relationship.
Master, Lord, King, Almighty God, we praise you for your generous love, kindness, mercy and compassion. Please guard us from all things that bring about confusion, conflict, competition, and discord of any kind. Please, unite us in your love.
. Are the austerities like fasting or something too much so as to weeken ones self but at the same time have a certen kind of high like one gets when their blood sugar levels get too low and they become week from it?From St. Teresa’s “Foundations.”
(Pg. 32, Introduction) The Mother Foundress had observed in her own communities that when physical strength is weakened through austerities, a kind of delightful absorption may so overpower a nun that she will allow it to possess her for long hours and even days, not wanting to part with such delight. Teresa carefully demonstrates in this work on her foundations how such absorption differs from rapture which is short-lived and extraordinarily beneficial in its effects. On the other hand, the long periods of time spent in the above mentioned absorption, she warns, are a waste; if austerities have caused the weakness, the must be reduced. (ch. 6)
I beleive this helps. It’s just that I guess I always thought infused and obsorbed where synonymous. Not sure why I thought that but since you are saying there is a difference I can see now why trying to understand this has been kind of confusing for me.Authentic contemplation, on the other hand, is short, usually no longer than an Ave (hail Mary), she says. God infuses, independent of any desire of the soul to bring it about (which is impossible), a heavenly gift of Himself to the soul which is joy beyond all telling. As the spirituality of the soul is enabled to receive such favors, this gift will begin with infused “recollection” and advance to deeper infillings from God, if it remains faithful.
Bear in mind that this gift may not be received again for many years after the soul progresses into deeper spirituality. It is granted only when God is pleased to bestow it, and in the soul’s capacity to receive.
I hope this is not too difficult to grasp, but if you have more questions, some of us may be able to help you.
Prayer of Quiet
There are degrees of contemplation and often acquired contemplation is the beginning.The Prayer of Quiet is regarded by all writers on mystical theology as one of the degrees of contemplation. newadvent.org/cathen/12608b.htm
Yes. In Chapter 6:14 that the Introduction referred to, she says this:Thank you Sirach I beleive it helps but just a few clarifications.
. Are the austerities like fasting or something too much so as to weeken ones self but at the same time have a certen kind of high like one gets when their blood sugar levels get too low and they become week from it?
We don’t use techniques, but we do use methods of prayer. The Rosary is a method of prayer, as well as Quiet Prayer.Father Philippe: It would be better to say interior prayer instead of mental prayer, because in our modern culture, the word “mental” is associated with thoughts – as something cerebral – whereas this form of prayer is more an affair of the heart, instead of reflection. St. Teresa of Avila said that it is not an act of thinking much, but of loving much.
Oh wow…actually I beleive I may have heard this some where before.Yes. In Chapter 6:14 that the Introduction referred to, she says this:
There was a nun there who was no less virtuous than those mentioned. Through disciplines and fasts, she became so weak that each time she received communion or had occasion to be enkindled in devotion, she would immediately fall to the floor and there remain for eight or nine hours. It seemed to her and everyone else that she was experiencing a rapture. This happened so often that if a remedy had not been provided, much harm would have resulted.
I understood its nature and I feared almost where it would end up. Her confessor was a close friend of mine and he came to tell me about it. I told him what I understood and why the absorption was a waste of time and couldn’t possibley be a rapture, but the result of weakness.
I told him to take away her fasts and disciplines and to distract her. She was obedient; she did as he said. As soon as she began to gain strength, there was no more thought of rapture. And if indeed the experience had been one of rapture, nothing would have sufficed to prevent it except the will of God.
Lady Love, I’m glad you found Bookcat’s link to the catechism’s discussion of contemplation to be helpful. Hopefully this will lead to better understanding on this thread and throughout these forums.
So, I spoke with my priest on the issue of “feelings, absorption, ecstasies, prayer of quiet, etc.” He said that those things are not contemplation but the symptoms of contemplation in a person who has not yet become accustomed to the constant presence of God and that St. Teresa herself considered them a “weakness” of the human condition.
I know other posters have commented on LadyLove’s post here already. I’d just like to add a few words. I think the priest is partly wrong and partly right. Ecstasies and the prayer of quiet are certainly mystical graces and infused forms of prayer or contemplation according to St Theresa. They are graces leading to the spiritual marriage. Isn’t it St Teresa or St John of the Cross who says that the external manifestations of infused contemplation such as ecstasies are due to either the weakness of the soul or the soul’s imperfections? I believe it is St John of the Cross who says that in the spiritual marriage those external manifestations such as ecstasies tend to cease or do cease because the soul is more purified and stronger. Thus, our Blessed Lady, who was united with God in a more intimate way than any other creature, is not recorded as having these external manifestations.
Also, on the matter of “quieting the mind or any other effort,” on our part, to create a “readiness” for contemplation, is not in itself contemplation.
May I make a suggestion? I love your user name, and it speaks to me about St. Therese’s Little Way, a simplicity of life, living close to God and offering even the smallest of deeds with perfect love. St. Therese made it her habit never to let anyone else know what kind of food she preferred - she cheerfully ate whatever was presented to her in thanksgiving to God.Oh wow…actually I beleive I may have heard this some where before.
Made me purposely brake my fast if I ever started to feel fatigued or week from it like my blood sugar was getting too low or something. used to think there was something wrong with me because I can not seem to fast too well. Now I am almost afraid to ever fast again.
Sounds like a good plan.May I make a suggestion? I love your user name, and it speaks to me about St. Therese’s Little Way, a simplicity of life, living close to God and offering even the smallest of deeds with perfect love. St. Therese made it her habit never to let anyone else know what kind of food she preferred - she cheerfully ate whatever was presented to her in thanksgiving to God.
Maybe that could be your effort, rather than try to fast. It would be easy to fast from favorite things on occasion, or to be cheerful when you are served a morsel that is unpleasant to eat. So many of us complain when food is too cold, too overdone, not enough salt or spices, etc. Follow St. Therese’s practice and eat unto the Lord, and never complain. It will be a most delightful sacrifice pleasing to Him.![]()