M
mcq72
Guest
Correct assumption, at least not in terms of trans or consubstantiation…but it definitely it is His body somehow, at the very least and maybe most, representative. And for sure the bread is still bread and the wine “fruit of the vine”, and the central theme of the rite/ritual/remembrance became “thanksgiving” (eucharist), not literal transformation/ re-presenting/repropitiating. As far as any reception of Him, it would be along lines of a spiritual one, as in Calvary identification, and “He inhabits the praises of His people”…etc.,etc…lol…we could go on and on, as other threads have shown on this topic, and we be heirs of the Luther, Calvin and Zwingli “discussion”.Would it be safe, then, to assume you do not believe that Christ, in His Supper, was literal when He said, “this is my body”?
Last edited: