L
ltwin
Guest
It’s called the Regensburg Colloquy, but I don’t know what was actually worked out.
Yes, that’s kind of what I thought. I never know for sure, what with all these folks who done be knowing all these big words ‘n’ such.
It really is very sad.mrsdizzyd:![]()
That’s very sad.So, I was brought up with Faith= belief and trust. No consistent aspect of commitment required.
Luther’s Die Bibel has 74 books. It includes the Prayer of Manasseh. I have a copy ( not an original, of course).Thank you for your quote of Luther’s letter on translating. I have looked online at Rom. 3:28. Incidentally, I was told that Luther also translated the Apocrypha. Yet in all the online versions of Luther’s Bible that I have seen, they have only the basic 66 books of Protestantism, not the Apocrypha or Deuterocanonical books.
Yes, this makes most sense to me. I object to the idea of “faith alone” because saving faith is NEVER alone. It is always accompanied by the fruits that befit repentance. St. Paul writes that faith is always in company:The famous phrase we are “justified by faith alone” could be phrased another way : we are justified by faith only, but faith is never alone . Faith will always be accompanied by good works that flow from the sanctifying grace of God and the gratitude of a changed heart.
Someone said “Amen, preach it Brother” somewhere over near my corner!ltwin:![]()
Yes, this makes most sense to me. I object to the idea of “faith alone” because saving faith is NEVER alone. It is always accompanied by the fruits that befit repentance. St. Paul writes that faith is always in company:The famous phrase we are “justified by faith alone” could be phrased another way : we are justified by faith only, but faith is never alone . Faith will always be accompanied by good works that flow from the sanctifying grace of God and the gratitude of a changed heart.
“And now faith, hope, and love abide, these three; and the greatest of these is love.” 1 Corinthians 13:13
My understanding of saving faith is a faith that works. I don’t like the common Catholic formulation that we are saved by “faith and works” because I think it just causes problems with our separated brethren. I was recently accused of being Pelagian on here, for example.
It is more the quality of the faith - it is a faith that is active in love - it produces hope and the fruit of good deeds.
"For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything; the only thing that counts is faith working through love." Galatians 5:6
If it is a faith that does not produce fruit, and does not work through love, then it is a “dead” faith.
I am not sure that there is a difference here. Luther and Calvin both had a very Catholic perception of authentic faith being lived out in one’s deeds (works). It was not until more modern evangelicals innovated a concept of sola fide that was independent of the sanctified life that it really caused a disconnect. Some even believe they can pray the sinners prayer then "I can do whatever I want, because I am already saved). This was not what the Apostles taught!Yeah, but it’s my understanding that the Lutherans and Calvinists just see the works as the fruits of faith. Catholics see them as on an equal footing with faith, an expression of faith, not just something good that’s going to happen as a result of having faith.
Surely it was not a Catholic!Someone said “Amen, preach it Brother” somewhere over near my corner!
Just a minute…actually he says he is catholic! :hugs:Wannano:![]()
Surely it was not a Catholic!Someone said “Amen, preach it Brother” somewhere over near my corner!![]()
Anyone praying the sinners prayer and then believing they can go and enjoy sinning because they are saved is about on the same level as anyone knowingly committing a serious sin and enjoying it because they know they can just go to Confession tomorrow.Tis_Bearself:![]()
I am not sure that there is a difference here. Luther and Calvin both had a very Catholic perception of authentic faith being lived out in one’s deeds (works). It was not until more modern evangelicals innovated a concept of sola fide that was independent of the sanctified life that it really caused a disconnect. Some even believe they can pray the sinners prayer then "I can do whatever I want, because I am already saved). This was not what the Apostles taught!Yeah, but it’s my understanding that the Lutherans and Calvinists just see the works as the fruits of faith. Catholics see them as on an equal footing with faith, an expression of faith, not just something good that’s going to happen as a result of having faith.
I have always been amazed at how Eph. 2:8-10 becomes separated from v. 11. Catholics have always kept these verses together, as the purpose for which we have been saved cannot be separated from being justified before God.
8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God— 9 not the result of works, so that no one may boast. 10 For we are what he has made us, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand to be our way of life. Eph. 2:8-11
This site summarizes it this way:Interesting. Are there documents of what was offered by them?
This article offers good analysis of the problems with the article on justification from a Protestant perspective: Regensburg and Regensburg II: Trying to Reconcile Irreconcilable Differences on Justification. Apparently, this Catholic-Protestant compromise position has a name: " double justice” ( duplex iustitia ).The result was the infamous Regensburg Book that would serve as the basis for the colloquy in April and May of 1541. The Catholic representatives were Eck, Gropper, and the humanist Julius Pflug, while the Protestants were Bucer, Melanchthon, and Johannes Pistorius. Over those two months, the colloquy led to agreement on numerous articles, including the fall, free will, the cause of sin, and original sin. Eventually compromise was even reached on justification, with both sides agreeing—albeit reluctantly—to a doctrine of double righteousness that balanced a largely Catholic inherited righteousness with a Protestant imputed righteousness. Despite those achievements, the sides could not reconcile their views on the church, the relationship between church and Scripture, or the sacraments, leading to the dissolution of the colloquy. Both Rome and the Protestants ultimately rejected the agreements reached there. Charles V laid aside efforts at religious reconciliation and turned to military concerns, trusting the pope to convoke the promised council and preparing for war against the resisting Schmalkaldic League.
Beautifully done, if we take out all the arrogance, bitterness, strife, judgementalism, hatred and suspicion we are left with love. Why is it so hard?Well, there is a simplicity in our Faith’s message. God is! The Trinity exists. Jesus is & came to Earth to open Heaven’s door, again. It was closed when Adam & Eve sinned.We are loved & cherished by our Creator. The Bible is our map, back home to the Father. Our Faith is a free gift. We can’t purchase it! But, Faith w/o Works is dead! A Christian should reflect Christ in Love & Charitable works.
The Holy Spirit calls us to embrace Christ.
The Bibles are the same x for Deutercanniocal books in our Catholic Bibles.
The main differences are that Catholics believe we are the one true church. But, all Christians go to heaven. I know some Protestants, who are Saints!
Another difference is our worship formats. They pulled back from frequent Communion b/c ppl weren’t embracing the Holiness of Communion.
Some believe Communion is a SYMBOL of the Last Supper. Some Protestants believe, the Eucharist is JESUS , as we do. Protestants have Praise Worship Services geared on the Ministers leading from God to teach on a certain topic. Catholics are more rigid w lining up readings related to the Saints days, Religious Holidays. All Catholic Churches, internationally, have the same readings & message.
God bless
Tweedlealice
I can settle for brotherly ecumenical love…that is more than some are willing to give…on both sides.Hey, I feel very loving towards most of my Protestant brothers and sisters, but if they aren’t going to get on board with our teachings about the Real Presence, Mary and the Pope, it’s going to just continue as brotherly ecumenical love.
I loved my husband but I never once took him to Mass that I didn’t give him a look for refusing to genuflect, or even bow like a Presbyterian. He wouldn’t even do it just to humor me. I guess now he gets to discuss that with the Big Boss. I did get him to sit in the Adoration Chapel with me for an hour after his dad died.
I like alot of what you said, some very good points.Well, there is a simplicity in our Faith’s message. God is! The Trinity exists. Jesus is & came to Earth to open Heaven’s door, again. It was closed when Adam & Eve sinned.We are loved & cherished by our Creator. The Bible is our map, back home to the Father. Our Faith is a free gift. We can’t purchase it! But, Faith w/o Works is dead! A Christian should reflect Christ in Love & Charitable works.
The Holy Spirit calls us to embrace Christ.
The Bibles are the same x for Deutercanniocal books in our Catholic Bibles.
The main differences are that Catholics believe we are the one true church. But, all Christians go to heaven. I know some Protestants, who are Saints!
Another difference is our worship formats. They pulled back from frequent Communion b/c ppl weren’t embracing the Holiness of Communion.
Some believe Communion is a SYMBOL of the Last Supper. Some Protestants believe, the Eucharist is JESUS , as we do. Protestants have Praise Worship Services geared on the Ministers leading from God to teach on a certain topic. Catholics are more rigid w lining up readings related to the Saints days, Religious Holidays. All Catholic Churches, internationally, have the same readings & message.
God bless
Tweedlealice
After reading some of the Reformers and later reformed theologians/preachers (Edwards, Spurgeon, Bunyan) I’ve come to the conclusion that your remarks are 100% correct. From the Protestant and even most of American Evangelical communities for a faith to be a saving faith it has to be a “living faith”. Faith is not something you do one time like say the “sinner’s prayer”. It is a changed heart that manifest itself in changed affections and attitudes and actions. When an Evangelical says “We are save by faith alone” what he means is “We are saved by a living faith alone that is so pervasive in my life that it has completed changed how I think, feel, and act towards God, toward my family, toward friends and toward strangers”If it is a faith that does not produce fruit, and does not work through love, then it is a “dead” faith.
I agree with much of this (though I would point out that sacraments/ordinances can also nurture our faith along with the other things you mentioned).I think the real argument is about the Sacraments. When Protestants say we are saved by faith alone what we normally mean is we are saved by a “living faith” and we grow and nurture or “living faith” by prayer, attending worship services, Bible Studies, Sunday School, and volunteering for ministries and so forth (without Sacraments). And I believe when Catholics say we are saved by “Faith + Works” what they mean is “We are saved by faith and the sacraments and participating in the activities of the Catholic church”. In other words, “works” from the Catholic viewpoint means being a good Catholic by regularly going to confession, going to Mass, following the liturgical calendar, and so forth.