Here she is quite obviously asked a question about working women (I believe that term is descriptive of women involved in employment) and women’s economic concerns and she responds, referencing Romney current campaign narrative which very obviously places working women at the center of his “War on Women” strategy.
Raising kids is a tough job. So she has worked, simply never outside the home, it looks like.
I agree with you there. That was, to me, the clearest “attack” in Rosen’s comments and certainly in line with previous ones in this campaign: he’s rich, he’s out of touch. I see no attack on stay at home moms in general.
I don’t have access to youtube.
I agree, and I think most people understand that the blame game will not work this time around.
Anderson definitely references women seeing jobs coming back more slowly than men in prefacing his question; so how can you say that working women are not mentioned? Who are the women losing those jobs or concerned about those statistics, if not working women?
Talking about unaddressed psch problems from childhood…It is really the Democrats “War on Moms.” Must be some residual unaddressed psych problems from childhood
It just highlights the casual contempt “progressives” have for women who have multiple children and feel raising them is the most important thing in life. The idea that a woman has to work outside the home and/or be struggling financially to understand the so called “plight” of women is absolute nonsense.
With all respect, you don’t see it because you don’t want to.
You guys sure are reading a lot of stuff into a simple ‘you can’t speak adequately to what you don’t know’ statement.
Or because I don’t see any reason for a stay at home mom to be ashamed of never having worked outside the home?
Then maybe you should ask Anderson to rephrase the question Rosen was responding to…He was quite clearly referencing women and the job market, among other concerns. For that matter, so was Romney in his recent comments.
As I pointed out before, while Anderson begins talking about jobs and the economy, and those concerns for women, Rosen expanded it to all women.
mediaite.com/tv/hilary-rosen-defends-her-ann-romney-comment-i-love-stay-at-home-moms-and-this-is-not-about-ann-romney/
When are the Republicans going to point out the Democrat’s “War on Children”?
Rosen didn’t say that stay at home moms should be ashamed, just that they don’t understand the economic concerns most women have (or, at least Ann Romney doesn’t).
I agree that she expanded her comments, but in direct reference to the so-called attack on stay at home moms, she linked to what Romney has been saying in his campaign - and Romney, unarguably & very definitively placed the job loss among women at the center of what he refers to as the real war on women. That is simply undeniable.
No, she doesn’t. She links Mrs Romeny’s lack of job experience directly to her husband’s recent strategy of defining the real war: on WORKING women.Rosen didn’t say that stay at home moms should be ashamed, just that they don’t understand the economic concerns most women have (or, at least Ann Romney doesn’t).
Why so they can argue about whether funding public education is an ‘attack’ on home-schooled children?When are the Republicans going to point out the Democrat’s “War on Children”?