7
7_Sorrows
Guest
7 Sorrows;14079042:
why do your posts attribute my posts to you? I have seen 2 so far.If it was on the tarmac it wasn’t secret.
7 Sorrows;14079042:
why do your posts attribute my posts to you? I have seen 2 so far.If it was on the tarmac it wasn’t secret.
Not so surprising when one think’s of the alternative.it surprises me the Bernie supporters who have so quickly forgotten how Bernie was burned by Hillary and the DNC! Pretty sad.
I wouldn’t think that a religious test for citizenship would survive a court challenge (although I’m not a lawyer so don’t actually know). But before an immigrant becomes a citizen, they might not be protected if Congress and the President decided to deport them or prevent them from entering the country because of their religion.Thank you for trying to clarify this for me. Is it your contention that Mr. Trump can apply a religious test to those who are applying for citizenship?
not publicly anyway. maybe if we could see those 30, 000 emails.But there is an important difference. For all her other faults, Hillary Clinton has never demeaned Muslims, has never proposed a ban on Muslim immigrants, has never spoken negatively about the religion of Islam. Donald Trump, on the other hand, has a, to put it charitably, less-than-perfect relationship with the (American) Muslim community at the moment. This is undoubtedly why the Khan family is opposed to Trump rather than Hillary. They had good words to say, however, about Ryan and other Republican leaders of Congress.
Then things may be scarier than I thought.I wouldn’t think that a religious test for citizenship would survive a court challenge (although I’m not a lawyer so don’t actually know). But before an immigrant becomes a citizen, they might not be protected if Congress and the President decided to deport them or prevent them from entering the country because of their religion.
I doubt that she’s done it privately, either. It doesn’t seem like something she would do. Despite all the Hillary bashing, she did a lot of things as a lawyer to help poor people, children, black people, etc. I don’t think she would be prejudiced against people because of their religion.not publicly anyway.
For the record, What I found funny was your definition of disgusting and nothing else. I personally would be more disgusted by someone covering up her husband’s rape allegations and persecuting his alleged rape victims.
I thinken when we quote each other something gets messed up.why do your posts attribute my posts to you? I have seen 2 so far.
So what does 9/11 have to do with Iraq?
many will be supporting Jill Stein. They won’t be voting for Hillary.Not so surprising when one think’s of the alternative.
PLEASE - Learn to read … I never said I was worried … I aid the reason why we have a Constitutional - individual Right is precisely because our government is of and by the consent of the governed - which the citizens fought for - by rising up against the government - that is why it is referred to as a REVOLUTION …If you’re worried about having to rise up as a citizen, unless you have armed yourself with all the tanks and bombs and other munitions the US govt has at its disposal in the 21st century, my money would be on the govt.
So?many will be supporting Jill Stein. They won’t be voting for Hillary.
More people watched Donald’s speech than Hillary’s.
I agree with your assessment of Trump’s character and he should be more respectful to the parents of fallen soldiers whether he agrees with them politically or not. Yet I wouldn’t say Hilary is any better. Remember her lies about Benghazi and then calling the mother of Sean Smith a liar?Trump is, as ever, true to form. I suppose one could make a case that consistency is a virtue. He acts just like a spoiled child. It is amazing that a man with a character such as this is the Republican contender for POTUS. (No need to remark about Hillary’s character. But even she would not have stooped so low in this instance.) The man has, at the very least, a personality disorder: he cannot help himself.
Did you happen to read the articles about the other mothers of Benghazi victims who did not agree with the poor mother who appeared at the RNC. They were there and did not hear what she heard. Can we all agree that these parents have had to endure the unendurable and maybe we should let them grieve any way they see fit. Some ways we will agree with and other ways not. Let’s just say a prayer of gratitude that we have been spared this anguish.I agree with your assessment of Trump’s character and he should be more respectful to the parents of fallen soldiers whether he agrees with them politically or not. Yet I wouldn’t say Hilary is any better. Remember her lies about Benghazi and then calling the mother of Sean Smith a liar?
A half-century of Chronicle endorsements: 11 R, 2 D:That Bipartisan Report website does not mention that the Houston Chronicle endorsed Barack Obama and Joe Biden in 2008: m.chron.com/opinion/recommendations/article/Obama-for-president-Biden-for-vice-president-1764759.php
Here’s another poll that has come from RABA Research:Nate Silver at 538 cited them on 23 July in his discussion of Trump’s convention bounce:
fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-is-trump-getting-a-convention-bump/
Here is another poll from Raba researchI saw that earlier but I wasn’t really sure about RABA. Nate Silver has been asked about that and he rates them fairly high-said they’re new to the game but they’ve had a good record so far. They do their polling online but they use standard polling methods to weight for demographics, unlike most online polls. I guess we’ll see.
Obama is getting a big bounce, according to Gallup. His already fairly high approval rating is going up, up, up. Not at all surprised by that given his speech.
I’m not voting for Trump. But I watched his speech. I missed Hillary’s speech because I was under the weather and went to bed earlier. I am planning on watching it.many will be supporting Jill Stein. They won’t be voting for Hillary.
More people watched Donald’s speech than Hillary’s.