Democratic Party Convention General Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter _Abyssinia
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why would anyone discuss abortion in the midst of a conversation about guns?
I truly am disgusted at those people who claim to be Catholic that do not stand up for their parties stance on killing those most innocent. There has not been one democrat catholic say their party is wrong and that is disturbing.
 
Probably because not every conversation (from guns to the weather to the 4th of July) has to come back to abortion.
It has to do with being disturbed that people who profess to follow the faith do not condemn the party they are married that abortion is killing the most innocent. I am curious why you have not said that you disagree with your parties staunch stance on killing?
 
Why would anyone discuss abortion in the midst of a conversation about guns?
I posted several replies on guns. I cannot understand how people who claim to follow the faith completely disregard and do not respond to the killing of the most innocent. I will ask this question but would bet you will not respond directly…does your party support and promote abortion without restrictions?

Do you do anything within your party to change that?
 
I truly am disgusted at those people who claim to be Catholic that do not stand up for their parties stance on killing those most innocent.
Yes, you’ve made your disgust plain.
I am curious why you have not said that you disagree with your parties staunch stance on killing?
Perhaps because it sounds a lot like I’m being baited… Perhaps because the conversation wasn’t about abortion until you made it about abortion…
 
It has to do with being disturbed that people who profess to follow the faith do not condemn the party they are married that abortion is killing the most innocent. I am curious why you have not said that you disagree with your parties staunch stance on killing?
I cannot speak for Gracepoole, but I will anyway. Maybe because she recognizes that not all Americans (Democrats and Republicans) are Catholic. For example, in the Jewish faith, it is believed the soul enters the human body at birth, not at conception. Thus the unborn child, although human, is not considered to have full personhood until ensoulment occurs. This is a religious difference. With regard to abortion, there are other differences as well, involving the physical and mental health of the mother, severe congenital diseases, two unborn children in which one is inadvertently threatening the life of another, and so on. But I would not dream of requiring abortion in these instances, even to save the life of the mother in which it is required according to Jewish law, for non-Jewish people, including Catholics. I believe we must respect differing religious views concerning this highly personal, emotional issue, even if they don’t conform to my own.
 
As Good Tidings said, so what.

I won’t be voting for Jill Stein. Of course some Republicans won’t be voting for Trump. You never get 100%.

And more people watched the Democratic convention overall. I watched both Trump’s and Hillary’s speeches but there are people right here on CAF who say they only watched Trump but not Hillary. That may have played a part in why Trump’s was watched by more. His opponents were willing to watch both speeches.
I actually watched more of the democrat convention than the Republican. I was curious. I remembered the big convention in 2008.
they followed closely to the same script. making history-the changemaker. same cliches and rhetoric. it all didn’t sit well with me. I am no longer able to be a democrat.
 
I cannot speak for Gracepoole, but I will anyway. Maybe because she recognizes that not all Americans (Democrats and Republicans) are Catholic. For example, in the Jewish faith, it is believed the soul enters the human body at birth, not at conception. Thus the unborn child, although human, is not considered to have full personhood until ensoulment occurs. This is a religious difference. With regard to abortion, there are other differences as well, involving the physical and mental health of the mother, severe congenital diseases, two unborn children in which one is inadvertently threatening the life of another, and so on. But I would not dream of requiring abortion in these instances, even to save the life of the mother in which it is required according to Jewish law, for non-Jewish people, including Catholics. I believe we must respect differing religious views concerning this highly personal, emotional issue, even if they don’t conform to my own.
For the record I always have respected your opinions and posts on here as being honest and fair according to your true beliefs. But this is a Catholic forum and Gracepoole is a Catholic and has defended her party by her silence rather than Catholic teaching on this mass killing.
 
Yes, you’ve made your disgust plain.

Perhaps because it sounds a lot like I’m being baited… Perhaps because the conversation wasn’t about abortion until you made it about abortion…
Not one time have I baited. But not even 1 time have you done anything but defended your party of abortion. You have not even 1 time mentioned that you disagreed with their stance on abortion.

I am not trying to be mean, but I honestly believe that catholics that are so staunchly democrat are so ONLY because their is one issue in their party that benefits them. I really believe that to be true.
 
I cannot speak for Gracepoole, but I will anyway. Maybe because she recognizes that not all Americans (Democrats and Republicans) are Catholic. For example, in the Jewish faith, it is believed the soul enters the human body at birth, not at conception. Thus the unborn child, although human, is not considered to have full personhood until ensoulment occurs. This is a religious difference. With regard to abortion, there are other differences as well, involving the physical and mental health of the mother, severe congenital diseases, two unborn children in which one is inadvertently threatening the life of another, and so on. But I would not dream of requiring abortion in these instances, even to save the life of the mother in which it is required according to Jewish law, for non-Jewish people, including Catholics. I believe we must respect differing religious views concerning this highly personal, emotional issue, even if they don’t conform to my own.
This is well-stated.

Anyone truly interested in my personal views (which are likely to bore most, I assume) can read through my past posts, in which I’ve written about the “non-negotiables” and abortion.
 
Not one time have I baited. But not even 1 time have you done anything but defended your party of abortion. You have not even 1 time mentioned that you disagreed with their stance on abortion.
Are you referring here to the whole of my posts on CAF (in which case you’re very much mistaken) or in this thread?
I am not trying to be mean, but I honestly believe that catholics that are so staunchly democrat are so ONLY because their is one issue in their party that benefits them. I really believe that to be true.
I have already noted in this thread the issues which Americans (Republican and Democrat) list as those that they view as most important – and abortion isn’t in the top 4 for either party.
 
Are you referring here to the whole of my posts on CAF (in which case you’re very much mistaken) or in this thread?

I have already noted in this thread the issues which Americans (Republican and Democrat) list as those that they view as most important – and abortion isn’t in the top 4 for either party.
But you do not admit that abortion is one of the, if not the most important top priorities of your party, you keep trying to deflect on that.
 
But you do not admit that abortion is one of the, if not the most important top priorities of your party, you keep trying to deflect on that.
Most Democrats do not vote based on abortion. I’m not attempting to deflect. I genuinely don’t understand why you think most Democrats vote on this issue.
 
Most Democrats do not vote based on abortion. I’m not attempting to deflect. I genuinely don’t understand why you think most Democrats vote on this issue.
Most democrats vote for their own self interest because they dont think that killing the most innocent is that important. Do you agree with that? If not why do you not think that.
 
Most democrats vote for their own self interest because they dont think that killing the most innocent is that important. Do you agree with that? If not why do you not think that.
Both Republicans and Democrats vote primarily on the same 4 issues and as I noted earlier, abortion isn’t one of them (they’re identified here). If Democrats “vote for their own self-interest because they don’t think that killing the most innocent is that important,” it seems Republicans also don’t prioritize the unborn no matter what they may say publicly.
 
Both Republicans and Democrats vote primarily on the same 4 issues and as I noted earlier, abortion isn’t one of them (they’re identified here). If Democrats “vote for their own self-interest because they don’t think that killing the most innocent is that important,” it seems Republicans also don’t prioritize the unborn no matter what they may say publicly.
You once again are trying to mislead on saying that is what the republicans prioritize. The survey is what they agree that is important.

How can anyone believe a party that is so callous against the most innocent? I don’t know how else to say it, but it is selfish people who have their own self interest as their priority that will enable this killing to become even more acceptable. It is these selfish people that refuse to condemn the party they are married to because of their own self interest that party conveniently claims to support.

People like this enable and continue to erode Catholic teaching. They should be proud of themselves to be above Christ.

Regarding your comment, I looked back and could not find one comment that disagrees with your parties gospel. Did I overlook or miss it.
 
You once again are trying to mislead on saying that is what the republicans prioritize. The survey is what they agree that is important.
What, to you, is the difference between “prioritize” and “what they agree is important”?
How can anyone believe a party that is so callous against the most innocent? I don’t know how else to say it, but it is selfish people who have their own self interest as their priority that will enable this killing to become even more acceptable. It is these selfish people that refuse to condemn the party they are married to because of their own self interest that party conveniently claims to support.
And yet (again) most Democrats don’t vote based on abortion. They vote primarily based on the same issues that Republicans vote on. So how are they voting for “their own self interest as their priority” while the majority of Republicans aren’t?
Regarding your comment, I looked back and could not find one comment that disagrees with your parties gospel. Did I overlook or miss it.
Missed it.

But really, why does it matter? I’m a lone anonymous poster on a public forum.
 
I posted several replies on guns. I cannot understand how people who claim to follow the faith completely disregard and do not respond to the killing of the most innocent. I will ask this question but would bet you will not respond directly…does your party support and promote abortion without restrictions?

Do you do anything within your party to change that?
Hold on just a minute. Let’s look at the history. You began a series of posts having to do with guns, starting with post #1083, #1091, 1103, #1204, and #1206. In these posts you were content to focus on the issue of guns. You did not mention abortion once in all those posts. It was only starting with post #1209 that you pivoted and began insisting that we could not discuss guns unless we did so in the context of abortion. What changed?

Well, it looks like as long as you thought you could win your point by talking about guns, you would do that. But when you backed yourself into a corner with the unsupportable claim that an armed uprising against a tyrannical government would not be about shooting at cops that you decided to turn the discussion to one about abortion. That looks a bit too convenient.

But frankly, I’m surprised you didn’t take the obvious response to that problem. You could have simply admitted that yes, if there was a popular uprising and the police and military defended the government, then cops would get killed. But if the cops were supporting a corrupt tyrannical government, they would just be unavoidable casualties of war, and it would be their own fault for supporting such a regime. You could have said that, and no one could have said anything further. You didn’t have to hide behind the issue of abortion.
 
Most Democrats do not vote based on abortion. I’m not attempting to deflect. I genuinely don’t understand why you think most Democrats vote on this issue.
I f this is true then why is the Democratic Party Platform even more pro-Abortion each year and this year it is the most Pro-Abortion Platform it has ever been … for something that is not that important it sure gets lots of coverage in the goals of the platform.

If it was not that important - then why does every pro-Life Democrat with National aspirations have to change their pro-Life position of get very adept at linguistic gymnastics and become a spineless person who is "personally opposed but … " will vote the party line

The Democratic Party is 100% for the slaughter if innocent children at the whim of the mother, coercion of family, friends, fathers at any time from conception to partial birth … and a few [those like Peter Singer - who stated that parents might wish a disabled child had never been born…] in the party even think that it should be acceptable for a short time after the baby is born as well. 🤷 Abortion [Death] = Democratic Party Platform.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top