Democrats teach same sex marriage is ok.abortion ok. No god on party platform

[almost2]

Democrats teach same sex marriage is ok. Abortion ok. No god on party platform .

Can Catholics. Vote democrats.
And is it a sin?
Or is it “who am i to judge” ?

 

[1Lord1Faith]

Each candidate who runs on the Democratic Party ticket has to be evaluated by the voter individually.

 

[Crusaderbear]

Always remember, you are voting for a person, not a party…

 

[Vonsalza]

Democrats teach same sex marriage is ok. Abortion ok. No god on party platform .

Can Catholics. Vote democrats.
And is it a sin?
Or is it “who am i to judge” ?

As the parties are assembled for secular governance, God probably shouldn’t be mentioned on any party platform.

I don’t read anything about God in my repair manual for my Ford. I still find it very useful…

 

[Pobreton]

If I remember correctly the USCCB publishes a guide for Catholic voters in the USA.

 

[steve-b]

Democrats teach same sex marriage is ok. Abortion ok. No god on party platform .

Can Catholics. Vote democrats.
And is it a sin?

When there is an option to vote for a party of life over a party for death, God always says vote life. Dt30:19 RSVCE - I call heaven and earth to witness - Bible Gateway

wait till all the people are judged by God for being and voting for abortions and abortion rights when they had the ability to vote life…

almost2:

Or is it “who am i to judge” ?

People take that way tooooo far.
Take a look at this. http://www.ncregister.com/blog/msgr-pope/how-to-respond-when-people-say-who-am-i-to-judge

 

[SuperLuigi]

@CoffeeAndDonuts @Shakuhachi

As the parties are assembled for secular governance, God probably shouldn’t be mentioned on any party platform.

Except of course when it comes to offending Islam or getting the votes of Black Church ladies.

Do you want to put yourselves in the position again of having to stroll out William Jefferson Clinton to save the day?

 

[SuperLuigi]

If I remember correctly the USCCB publishes a guide for Catholic voters in the USA.

It did, but like the one mentioned on CAF, it will be declared “invalid” if it interferes with virtue-signaling.

 

[Axsenex]

CHARTER OF THE UNITED FEDERATION OF PLANETS

“We the lifeforms of the United Federation of Planets determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, and to reaffirm faith in the fundamental rights of sentient beings, in the dignity and worth of all lifeforms, in the equal rights of members of planetary systems large and small, and to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of interstellar law can be maintained, and to promote social progress and better standards of living on all worlds, and for these ends, to practice toleration and live together in peace with one another, and to unite our strength to maintain interstellar peace and security, and to ensure, by the acceptance of principles and the institutions of methods, that weapons of destruction shall not be used, save in the common interest, and to employ interstellar resources for the promotion…”

LLAP :vulcan_salute:t2:

 

[Cor_ad_Cor]

When there is an option to vote for a party of life over a party for death, God always says vote life.

There currently is no party of life in the US and historically, I would venture, never has been. Therefore, it’s candidates we must consider.

 

[steve-b]

steve-b:

When there is an option to vote for a party of life over a party for death, God always says vote life.

There currently is no party of life in the US and historically, I would venture, never has been. Therefore, it’s candidates we must consider.

That’s incorrect

The democrat party is a party of death.

Bishop Thomas Tobin: Why I Switched to the Republican Party
http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/bishop-thomas-tobin-why-i-switched-to-the-republican-party . Just being transparent, I have no idea what took the bishop soooooo long to see the truth. But I’m glad he finally saw it.

The party ultimately controls the vote. NOT the individual.

Democratic Party on Abortion http://www.ontheissues.org/Democratic_Party.htm

Strongly and unequivocally support Roe v. Wade. (Sep 2012)
Invest in stem cell and other medical research. (Nov 2006)
Pursue embryonic stem cell research. (Jul 2004)
Support right to choose even if mother cannot pay. (Jul 2004)

Republican party on abortion http://www.ontheissues.org/Republican_Party.htm

Support human life amendment; oppose abortion funding. (Aug 2012)
Promote adoption & abstinence, not abortion clinic referrals. (Sep 2004)
Human Life Amendment to the Constitution. (Sep 2004)
Ban abortion with Constitutional amendment. (Aug 2000)
Alternatives like adoption, instead of punitive action. (Aug 2000)

 

[Crusaderbear]

I think the Dems are trading a positive endorsement of something vile for votes…sad, but their choice. I try and look at the person running, not the party platform…

 

[NuclearReceptor]

If there’s a pro-life, anti-homosexual agenda, pro-religious freedom Democrat, I could vote for her/him. But what are the chances that such a person would remain in today’s Democratic Party?

 

[po18guy]

The party has left its core behind in its rush toward the abyss. Very sad.

 

[Vonsalza]

@CoffeeAndDonuts @Shakuhachi

Vonsalza:

As the parties are assembled for secular governance, God probably shouldn’t be mentioned on any party platform.

Except of course when it comes to offending Islam or getting the votes of Black Church ladies.

Do you want to put yourselves in the position again of having to stroll out William Jefferson Clinton to save the day?

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

 

[johnjacob2004]

Pro life Protestants are more catholic than pro choice Catholics…

 

[JanSobieskiIII]

Both parties suck. I vote for the one that doesn’t openly support degenerates as a general rule, but democracy is an awful form of government.

 

[steve-b]

I think the Dems are trading a positive endorsement of something vile for votes…sad, but their choice. I try and look at the person running, not the party platform…

I showed Democrats teach same sex marriage is ok.abortion ok. No god on party platform - #13 by steve-b why that idea is bankrupt. Look at the positions of each party. The party controls the agenda of the party, not an individual candidate here and there in the party…

 

[NuclearReceptor]

Would you rather have an enlightened Catholic monarchy? I’d accept that in theory, but not all might be enlightened or Catholic…

 

[steve-b]

Pro life Protestants are more catholic than pro choice Catholics…

I would say, pro life Protestants are pro life Protestants. Pro Choice Catholics are indifferent towards life v murder, and will reap the consequences of that some day.