Think to remember about current solar panel installations: in spite of what some people think, solar panel installations mostly do not permit one to continue getting power from the panels when the utility power is out. So there is currently no benefit at all to that; the only benefit one gets today is the potential cost savings in electrical power during high usage times of the year in very hot regions or in cold regions that rely solely on electricity to provide heating.
The reason for this on the surface is that solar panels aren’t designed to feed power to the house, they’re designed to feed power to the grid for which the consumers get reimbursed via credits to their electric bills. So when there is an outage, the panel circuit is designed to switch itself off so it doesn’t feed power to the grid while the grid power is out. This would be a safety hazard to linemen potentially working on a problem so the utility has to insure that there is no live power coming in.
When I found that out, solar became a lot less attractive to me. What’s the point if I can’t have any power at all during outages? This appears to be a resistance point on the part of utilities not wanting to lose business, but if the utilities are cutting off power as is happening in California, then there is going to be definite demand for solar panels (and/or battery systems) designed to feed power to the house during an outage. I think the technology is there to rewire these systems with some sort of switching capability that would allow the house to be fed by panels (or batteries) during outages, yet not feed power to the grid if it doesn’t detect an active grid.