Design

  • Thread starter Thread starter tonyrey
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Man is bound by the sacraments. God is not. As God is the final authority on salvation, there is hope for everyone. That is a thoroughly “Catholic” position even endorsed by this website.

If you can’t internalize that, it’s either through intellectual inability or obstinate refusal. Either way, my work with you on this specific issue is complete. Your continued belief to the contrary is obviously free to persist, but you are factually in error when you purport it as the quintessentially “Catholic” position.
Bradski;14670757:
Actually, wasn’t it you that said you some experience with programming?

Let “Go to heaven” = Bl.ISS
Let “Go to hell” = Ag.ONY
Let “Forgiveness” = F
Let “Repentance” = R

IF R AND F
THEN Bl.ISS

ELSE Ag.ONY

Both conditions may apply for the Nazi. In which case he might get lucky. The first condition does not apply to the father, so we skip to the ELSE.
QED
 
[BIBLEDRB][/BIBLEDRB]
I’m sure you are still missing the point. If you don’t repent (and every scenario I have ever suggested assumes that), then you go to hell. Both repentance AND forgiveness are required.

If you don’t repent then your fate is sealed. Even if God forgives the unrepentant, according to the catechism, it makes no difference. So unless you want to argue that God’s forgiveness is still not enough to save you, or the catechism is wrong, then it is apparent thT God does not forgive anyone who does not repent.
 
[BIBLEDRB][/BIBLEDRB]I’m sure you are still missing the point. If you don’t repent (and every scenario I have ever suggested assumes that), then you go to hell. Both repentance AND forgiveness are required.
A good thing for all of to remember, including yourself, even if you are absolutely certain there is no God … because you can’t really know now, can you? :confused:. 🤷
 
A good thing for all of to remember, including yourself, even if you are absolutely certain there is no God … because you can’t really know now, can you? :confused:. 🤷
Oh, I can positively know that there are no four-sided triangles, or married bachelors, and many other logically contradictory “beings”.
 
A good thing for all of to remember, including yourself, even if you are absolutely certain there is no God … because you can’t really know now, can you? :confused:. 🤷
I’m sure that when the time comes I’ll be asking forgiveness from all those I have wronged in my time.
 
The “degrees of hell” is not a novel nor obscure idea within Christendom. Dante Alighieri wrote an interesting fiction based on the assumption 700 years ago.
:clapping:
It is eminently reasonable to believe all of us are punished by our moral defects in direct proportion to the amount and degree of misery and suffering we inflict on others - both persons and animals. The Greek concept of Nemesis and the Indian doctrine of Karma both reflect that view. One of the fundamental flaws of atheism is its implication there is cosmic injustice and evil remains unpunished. Camus, for example, believed “la mort est le supreme abus”. (Death is the supreme abuse)…🤷
 
:clapping:
Camus, for example, believed “la mort est le supreme abus”. (Death is the supreme abuse)…🤷
And that possibly the only way to abuse death is by committing suicide, as the *Myth of Sisyphus *suggests.
 
. . . One of the fundamental flaws of atheism is its implication there is cosmic injustice and evil remains unpunished. Camus, for example, believed “la mort est le supreme abus”. (Death is the supreme abuse)…🤷
Nor would there be any benefit to doing good. Everything ending in oblivion makes the universe amoral. This moment, for all the joys and suffering that it may encompass, would be as it never happened. Self-sacrifice, giving of oneself would ultimately produce nothing of value. Any momentary happiness of the other or oneself, to what end?

But here evil would flourish - death’s dominion. Do what you please and enjoy the moment. Take what you will, use others for your own purposes. Use death for personal gain. Every tyrant and butcher knows the score. But, there’s more to it than these lies. And, the truth will be known in the end, as those who used death must answer to it.

That truth is that this moment as all moments, exists in eternity, known as it is brought into existence from beyond time and space, right here, right now. There can be no oblivion for what is; rather a final settling of accounts in time for what one has done.

What can’t be changed can be forgiven. Most, and hopefully all of us will accept our guilt and shame and ask for forgiveness.
 
:clapping:
It is eminently reasonable to believe all of us are punished by our moral defects in direct proportion to the amount and degree of misery and suffering we inflict on others - both persons and animals. The Greek concept of Nemesis and the Indian doctrine of Karma both reflect that view. One of the fundamental flaws of atheism is its implication there is cosmic injustice and evil remains unpunished.
Are you not reading what has been posted? Where has anyone suggested that evil remains unpunished?

The point that no-one wants to address is that the definition of evil and the punishment for it is abhorrent.
 
The point that no-one wants to address is that the definition of evil and the punishment for it is abhorrent.
I don’t think the point that “hell is bad” is something we’re disagreeing on.

I think there is some disparity between your idea of hell and that of many (if not most) Catholics. I think that you believe that the serial killer and the adulterer are chained right next to each other, experiencing identical suffering. I won’t defend that understanding of hell because I don’t think its true.

Another disparity between us is “who goes to hell” and how that is determined. I’ve stated repeatedly that the Catholic position is that non-believers like the atheist and Muslim have hope, as all are subject to God’s judgement of their life’s deeds as the final “say”. Yes, we are bound by the sacraments. God is not.

This is something you’ve zealously resisted with asinine, clearly prejudicial obstinance.

Your understanding of Catholic “soteriology” is simply incorrect. It is objectively, demonstrably incorrect. I simply do not know what else to tell ya.
 
It is eminently reasonable to believe all of us are punished by our moral defects in direct proportion to the amount and degree of misery and suffering we inflict on others - both persons and animals. The Greek concept of Nemesis and the Indian doctrine of Karma both reflect that view. One of the fundamental flaws of atheism is its implication there is cosmic injustice and evil remains unpunished.
It seems you are not reading what has been posted. Significantly you have omitted my statement about Camus who believed “la mort est le supreme abus”. (Death is the supreme abuse)… How is evil punished if there is no afterlife?
The point that no-one wants to address is that the definition of evil and the punishment for it is abhorrent.
Jesus made it quite clear that evil is the failure to love others as oneself and exploit them as the Pharisees did. The real criminals get what they deserve in hell whereas their victims are compensated in heaven. What is abhorrent about that?
 
I don’t think the point that “hell is bad” is something we’re disagreeing on.

I think there is some disparity between your idea of hell and that of many (if not most) Catholics. I think that you believe that the serial killer and the adulterer are chained right next to each other, experiencing identical suffering. I won’t defend that understanding of hell because I don’t think its true.

Another disparity between us is “who goes to hell” and how that is determined. I’ve stated repeatedly that the Catholic position is that non-believers like the atheist and Muslim have hope, as all are subject to God’s judgement of their life’s deeds as the final “say”. Yes, we are bound by the sacraments. God is not.

This is something you’ve zealously resisted with asinine, clearly prejudicial obstinance.

Your understanding of Catholic “soteriology” is simply incorrect. It is objectively, demonstrably incorrect. I simply do not know what else to tell ya.
We can bring this to a close quite easily. If someone commits what the church defines as a mortal sin and does not repent, does that person go to hell? Any answer other than ‘yes’ puts you in direct conflict with the catechism irrespective of your personal view.
 
It seems you are not reading what has been posted. Significantly you have omitted my statement about Camus who believed “la mort est le supreme abus”. (Death is the supreme abuse)… How is evil punished if there is no afterlife?
Jesus made it quite clear that evil is the failure to love others as oneself and exploit them as the Pharisees did. The real criminals get what they deserve in hell whereas their victims are compensated in heaven. What is abhorrent about that?
With the proviso that the real criminals do not repent and are not prepared to make amends.
 
It seems you are not reading what has been posted. Significantly you have omitted my statement about Camus who believed “la mort est le supreme abus”. (Death is the supreme abuse)… How is evil punished if there is no afterlife?
Jesus made it quite clear that evil is the failure to love others as oneself and exploit them as the Pharisees did. The real criminals get what they deserve in hell whereas their victims are compensated in heaven. What is abhorrent about that?
With the proviso that the real criminals do not repent and are not prepared to make amends.
 
We can bring this to a close quite easily. If someone commits what the church defines as a mortal sin and does not repent, does that person go to hell? Any answer other than ‘yes’ puts you in direct conflict with the catechism irrespective of your personal view.
**1033 **We cannot be united with God unless we **freely **choose to love him. But we cannot love God if we sin gravely against him, against our neighbor or against ourselves: "He who does not love remains in death. Anyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him."612 Our Lord warns us that we shall be separated from him if we fail to meet the serious needs of the poor and the little ones who are his brethren.613 To die in mortal sin **without repenting and accepting God’s merciful love **means remaining separated from him for ever by our own free choice. This state of definitive **self-exclusion **from communion with God and the blessed is called “hell.”

NB It would be unjust to compel those who reject the Creator’s love to go to heaven or annihilate them. God is not a Dictator or Destroyer! No one would choose hell unless it has its compensations. Absolute independence has its advantages as well as its drawbacks but eternal isolation and frustration are a formidable price to pay for having one’s own kingdom especially when it is shared with other egoists. In that sense Sartre was right when he observed “L’enfer, c’est les autres…”
 
We can bring this to a close quite easily. If someone commits what the church defines as a mortal sin and does not repent, does that person go to hell? Any answer other than ‘yes’ puts you in direct conflict with the catechism irrespective of your personal view.
From the Catechism:
1257 The Lord himself affirms that Baptism is necessary for salvation.60 He also commands his disciples to proclaim the Gospel to all nations and to baptize them.61 Baptism is necessary for salvation for those to whom the Gospel has been proclaimed and who have had the possibility of asking for this sacrament.62 The Church does not know of any means other than Baptism that assures entry into eternal beatitude; this is why she takes care not to neglect the mission she has received from the Lord to see that all who can be baptized are “reborn of water and the Spirit.” God has bound salvation to the sacrament of Baptism, but he himself is not bound by his sacraments.
emphasis mine
 
We can bring this to a close quite easily. If someone commits what the church defines as a mortal sin and does not repent, does that person go to hell? Any answer other than ‘yes’ puts you in direct conflict with the catechism irrespective of your personal view.
The fatal flaw in your objection to hell is that it is not inflicted by God:

1033 We cannot be united with God unless we freely choose to love him. But we cannot love God if we sin gravely against him, against our neighbor or against ourselves: "He who does not love remains in death. Anyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him."612 Our Lord warns us that we shall be separated from him if we fail to meet the serious needs of the poor and the little ones who are his brethren.613 To die in mortal sin without repenting and accepting God’s merciful love means remaining separated from him for ever by our own free choice. This state of definitive** self-exclusion** from communion with God and the blessed is called “hell.”

Hell has its compensations; otherwise no one would opt for it! To have one’s own kingdom and absolute independence is a highly attractive temptation but it has its drawbacks because it entails isolation and frustration. Even in this world we see the consequences of the insatiable lust for power which inevitably ends in disaster and misery. Egoism and pride lead to a fool’s paradise which is short-lived…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top