Detroit's pacifist bishop resigns-Pope to announce the move today

  • Thread starter Thread starter GloriaPatri4
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Final warning: If you folks can’t disagree without taking potshots at each other, I will be forced to close the thread and suspend a few posters. In other words, be nice…or else!!

Walt
 
From the EWTN NewsLink:

*2-February-2006 – Vatican Information Service *ewtn.com/images/printer.gif
PONTIFICAL ACTS

VATICAN CITY, FEB 2, 2006 (VIS) - The Holy Father:
  • Accepted the resignation from the office of auxiliary of the archdiocese of Detroit, U.S.A., presented by Thomas J. Gumbleton, upon having reached the age limit.
 
40.png
shs-aod:
Because it’s Lifesite News that’s reporting…
I can’t say I was impressed with them placing Detroit in Illinois
DETROIT, Illinois, January 26, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Auxiliary Bishop Thomas Gumbleton, who is known as an activist for homosexuality in the Church, has handed in his resignation to the Vatican. Pope Benedict XVI is expected to announce the resignation today.
%between%
 
Could this bishop have been that bad that he deserves all of the backbiting I read here? 😦

I have never had a bishop I wasn’t proud of, this whole thread comes as a shock.

+T+
Michael
 
40.png
grotto:
Consider yourself spared!
And I would disagree…anyone who hasn’t had a chance to be proud of a bishop like gumbleton, has not had a chance to see what the Catholic faith could be in its fullness.
 
40.png
frommi:
And I would disagree…anyone who hasn’t had a chance to be proud of a bishop like gumbleton, has not had a chance to see what the Catholic faith could be in its fullness.
“Fullness” is taking it a bit too far. I will agree that he has his good traits…but vehemently disagree that he embodies the Catholic ideal.
:ehh:
 
msproule said:
“Fullness” is taking it a bit too far. I will agree that he has his good traits…but vehemently disagree that he embodies the Catholic ideal.
:ehh:

If more bishops eschewed the trappings of power that seem to pervade their judgment…then yeah, I think we’d have an ideal church.
 
40.png
frommi:
If more bishops eschewed the trappings of power that seem to pervade their judgment…then yeah, I think we’d have an ideal church.
That would certainly bring us closer :yup: …but not all the way. :nope:
 
40.png
msproule:
That would certainly bring us closer :yup: …but not all the way. :nope:
Perhaps not…one gets the feeling that the church on Earth will never quite be a finished product.
 
40.png
felra:
Having been shown to be incorrect on this claim and guess, I am left wondering what other “facts” or “guesses” that you present will turn out to be baseless conjecture? …:hmmm:
Shown wrong where? The pope did not mention contraception either in the encyclical or at World Youth Day. The most you could come up with is that he rejects the use of condoms as a method of preventing the spread of Aids. The media also noted it was the first time he even mentioned contraception since becoming pope.

Show me where this pope has spoken as pope about contraception being inherently disordered even within marriage and then you can claim that the pope isn’t one of those flamming liberals like Bishop Gumbleton if you insist on the “entire gospel” as criteria.

I am glad Felra you are here to save the church from those heretical liberal bishops.
 
Bishop Gumbleton is associated with pax christi which is a disinting organization…that in itself is problematic.

I believe Pope Benedict xvi has only one encylical so far…no doubt more will follow.

All you need to know is in the catechism of the Catholic church…you might want to pick on up they are not that expensive.
 
Gee, all I need is the CCC? I guess all that post-grad work in philosophy and theology was useless. Maybe we should just get rid of the bishops and replace every Cathedral with a Catechism and every priest with a Bible…oh wait? that has happened before.

I wish I could still see the world in black and white like a kid again but my new television has so many beautiful colours.

I think it is in particular bad taste and displays an unchristian spirit when people go around celebrating the retirement of a bishop for negative reasons and to further an agenda. It reminds me of some of the fundamentalists who sang for joy over the death of the pope (to them the antichrist).

If people cannot see any good in that man than I think it is hard to even call them Christian. True Christians see good and praise what is good in all creation. I recall the past pope even kissing a Qu’ran in praise of the partial truth it contains yet people here would rather burn Bishop Gumbleton in effige.
 
40.png
EtienneGilson:
I think it is in particular bad taste and displays an unchristian spirit when people go around celebrating the retirement of a bishop for negative reasons and to further an agenda. It reminds me of some of the fundamentalists who sang for joy over the death of the pope (to them the antichrist).
You are equating my happiness at seeing Gumbleton retire to a fundamentalist cheering Pope JPII’s death? Now that’s a reach. :rolleyes:
If people cannot see any good in that man than I think it is hard to even call them Christian. True Christians see good and praise what is good in all creation. I recall the past pope even kissing a Qu’ran in praise of the partial truth it contains yet people here would rather burn Bishop Gumbleton in effige.
Rather sweeping portrayal, and hugely inaccurate.

Gumbleton Consecrated the Eucharist. That is always a good thing. There. I said something good about him. That, and the fact that he is retired. 😃
 
Detroit Sue:
You are equating my happiness at seeing Gumbleton retire to a fundamentalist cheering Pope JPII’s death? Now that’s a reach. :rolleyes:
I second that. You can not even compare the two issues.
Detroit Sue:
Rather sweeping portrayal, and hugely inaccurate.

Gumbleton Consecrated the Eucharist. That is always a good thing. There. I said something good about him. That, and the fact that he is retired. 😃
Two good things you are right Sue.
 
Detroit Sue:
You are equating my happiness at seeing Gumbleton retire to a fundamentalist cheering Pope JPII’s death? Now that’s a reach. :rolleyes:

… come on Sue… ya gotta have a degree to make those comments. ;)😉

Rather sweeping portrayal, and hugely inaccurate.

Gumbleton Consecrated the Eucharist. That is always a good thing. There. I said something good about him. That, and the fact that he is retired. 😃
I think what good he can do is the question.

Now that he is retired, and in the winter of his discontent, perhaps he will start recanting some of the weirdness (is that a word?) he professed. Or, now that he is not restricted to be a vocal local pastor, he may become more visible (ouch!)

I think I know the answer… but we can always pray.
 
40.png
EtienneGilson:
I guess all that post-grad work in philosophy and theology was useless.
Ooooh…impressive!
:bowdown:
I know of some dissenting priests and theologians with such credentials. Modernist philosophy and theology are useless to faithful Catholics! In contrast, submission to the Magisterium and the Deposit of Faith are of great use.

Even a poorly-educated fool like myself can see that Pope Benedict XVI is giving us not-so-subtle hints about exercising our true freedom: “Know the Bible”, paraphrasing, of course, “Learn to pray in Latin”, “God is Love”, and here is his (indirect) condemnation of contraception: “There are only absolute, not relative, truths”.
:hmmm:
 
40.png
msproule:
Ooooh…impressive!
:bowdown:
I know of some dissenting priests and theologians with such credentials. Modernist philosophy and theology are useless to faithful Catholics! In contrast, submission to the Magisterium and the Deposit of Faith are of great use.

Even a poorly-educated fool like myself can see that Pope Benedict XVI is giving us not-so-subtle hints about exercising our true freedom: “Know the Bible”, paraphrasing, of course, “Learn to pray in Latin”, “God is Love”, and here is his (indirect) condemnation of contraception: “There are only absolute, not relative, truths”.
:hmmm:
Thanks, msproule, well said! 😃 and so very true.
 
40.png
msproule:
Ooooh…impressive!
:bowdown:
I know of some dissenting priests and theologians with such credentials. Modernist philosophy and theology are useless to faithful Catholics! In contrast, submission to the Magisterium and the Deposit of Faith are of great use.

Even a poorly-educated fool like myself can see that Pope Benedict XVI is giving us not-so-subtle hints about exercising our true freedom: “Know the Bible”, paraphrasing, of course, “Learn to pray in Latin”, “God is Love”, and here is his (indirect) condemnation of contraception: “There are only absolute, not relative, truths”.
:hmmm:
Modernist philosophy is not USELESS to Catholics, and once again your use of “faithful” concerns me, at no point did I see anyone in this thread say they weren’t “faithful”.

It cracks me up that people with no theological credentials can blast someone who has those credentials without even knowing what the credentials are.

And to paraphrase from someone I respect…

A lot of humility and a lot of caution are necessary for us who believe in absolute truth. To say that we know that something is absolutely true is not to say that we have a complete and exhaustive understanding of that truth. It is crucial to hearing and spreading the gospel that we do not fall into absolutism: thinking that we’ve exhausted and “tamed” truth and stashed it safely in our back pocket. Such an attitude easily leads to a kind of intellectual fascism where we equate our particular perspective on a truth with the truth itself and try to force others to believe in our supposedly correct under-standing. Those who are absolutists run a great risk of denying themselves the deepening understanding of truth necessary for faithfulness in life’s ever-changing situations
 
40.png
frommi:
And to paraphrase from someone I respect…

A lot of humility and a lot of caution are necessary for us who believe in absolute truth. To say that we know that something is absolutely true is not to say that we have a complete and exhaustive understanding of that truth. It is crucial to hearing and spreading the gospel that we do not fall into absolutism: thinking that we’ve exhausted and “tamed” truth and stashed it safely in our back pocket. Such an attitude easily leads to a kind of intellectual fascism where we equate our particular perspective on a truth with the truth itself and try to force others to believe in our supposedly correct under-standing. Those who are absolutists run a great risk of denying themselves the deepening understanding of truth necessary for faithfulness in life’s ever-changing situations
Probably the most beautiful thing I have seen written on this website (other than the occasional Chesterton quote).

I wish I had my copy of Copleston’s History of Medeival Philosophy with me (or Dom David Knowles’ Evolution of Medieval Thought) because those two scholars (both clergy as well) recount at length the opposition of the conservative theologians to the innovations of the scholastics. But those books are in Canada and I am currently in France (which explains part of my problem…the other part being this daarn Belgian keyboard with the letters miraculously all in different places from what I am used to).

Even my signature is a quote from Copleston’s section on Aquinas…that modernist innovator.

I will pray for Bishop Gumbleton that he will be a force of peace and a missionary for Christ as he enters this exciting time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top