Did Adam wake up in Genesis 2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nablaise
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

nablaise

Guest
I am meditating on the first stories of Genesis for few weeks and I need to hear some comments about them.

One of the intrigue is when God said for the first time that something was not good. Here sin had not happened yet, well at least not according to the litteral meaning of the narrative. But it would seem that may be sin had just happened?! somehow.

Couldn’t it be possible that the third chapter is a kind of repetion of the second but under a different perspective just us the second chapter is to the first?

It seem that man is mentioned as being alone after being introduced to the tree of knowledge of good and evil. The first ‘not good’ thing is mentioned after the introduction of this mysterious tree. Here is my musing at the moment: man felt alone while he was not supposed to really. He was not alone. He was with God. In fact man must have been with his wife (before separation). But the tree could have caused separation and caused man to feel alone. All this is happening while man is made of ‘dust’. Flesh was not spoken of before Adam’s deep sleep. Plus why would God who is one but not alone create man alone? Or why would God proced to divise man into two parts as male and female while God only unite but does not divide?

So I think man did something to the tree of knowledge of good and evil which provoked the following stories in the rest of Genesis 2. God looks like he was responding to something he did not make himself. God is trying to save man from his loneliness. So he educate man and transforms him. It seems to me that man went from being ‘dust’ to having ‘flesh’. His deep sleep seem to go with the separation between Adam and his wife.

Genesis 3 seem to explain the last part of Genesis 2. The serpent seem to have been the one who divided the unity of man. He caused man to be lonely. Adam and Eve became lonely after sin; they were hiding and pointing accusating fingers at each other. They were in terrible condition. But God came to them. He put skin (flesh?) on them in order to cover their shameful nudity and send them away out of paradize. This could correspond to the deep sleep the lonely man crossed (or is supposed to cross) in order to (re)descover the unity: since man will leave his parent and join his wife to become one flesh. But even here we have division. Here man still have to ‘leave’ his parents…which is not really complete unity but we still have to deal with divisions…and this is incompatible with God who is love and who unites.

Overall, it seem that united man at the very beginning was in a different realm. But after sin which divided him, God incarnated him into flesh as He was closing the garden of Eden. It seem to me that it is this incarnation in flesh which is described as DEEP SLEEP. Because after this, man suddenly have flesh and is saying to his wife that she is flesh of his flesh.

The tree of good and evil must have caused the united man to idolatry of animal/‘flesh’ symbolized as the serpent. So Adam must have desired to be like animals instead of being like God. So while Adam went through all the animal kind trying to identify with it instead of trying to identify with God, he ended up by become LIKE animal kind. So this is why we look like animals and are part of the animal families even though we are different, very different.

This could also explain why Abel sacrificed animals. God himself had sacrificed animals in order to find skin for the fallen man. So what animals did God sacrifice? could it be some chimpanzee? :D? Are our bodies some mixture of ‘dust’ and some 'Dawkin’s chimpanzee skins?

Later Jesus sacrificed his own human body. And st. Paul teaches us to be at constant warfare with flesh. I am not saying that the human body is bad. As the Cathechism says, there is something good in it. That thing which God will resurrect on the last day.

I think the real body is different. I mean. May be what God meant by telling the serpent that “upon thy breast shalt thou go, and earth shalt thou eat all the days of thy life.” he was referring to our bodies being bound by gravity and depending on plants to survive.

So this mysterious DEEP SLEEP seem to me that it is cosmic. With it we entered into a cosmos which will be destroyed at the final judgment. Why would the universe be destroyed if it was ‘good’ as God want’s it? But God will destroy it and bring about a new heaven and a new earth. Could the final resurrection be the time when we will really wake up with our father Adam?

Does all this make any sens? Did any one hear more detailed explanation about Genesis. I am trying to read Theology of the Body, I try to consider what I read there in my understanding of Genesis, but I would like to hear more view or more explanation of Genesis.

I think understanding of Genesis is fundamental to understanding the meaning of life and making sens of who we are.

God bless
 
I am meditating on the first stories of Genesis for few weeks and I need to hear some comments about them.

One of the intrigue is when God said for the first time that something was not good. Here sin had not happened yet, well at least not according to the litteral meaning of the narrative. But it would seem that may be sin had just happened?! somehow.

Couldn’t it be possible that the third chapter is a kind of repetion of the second but under a different perspective just us the second chapter is to the first?

It seem that man is mentioned as being alone after being introduced to the tree of knowledge of good and evil. The first ‘not good’ thing is mentioned after the introduction of this mysterious tree. Here is my musing at the moment: man felt alone while he was not supposed to really. He was not alone. He was with God. In fact man must have been with his wife (before separation). But the tree could have caused separation and caused man to feel alone. All this is happening while man is made of ‘dust’. Flesh was not spoken of before Adam’s deep sleep. Plus why would God who is one but not alone create man alone? Or why would God proced to divise man into two parts as male and female while God only unite but does not divide?

So I think man did something to the tree of knowledge of good and evil which provoked the following stories in the rest of Genesis 2. God looks like he was responding to something he did not make himself. God is trying to save man from his loneliness. So he educate man and transforms him. It seems to me that man went from being ‘dust’ to having ‘flesh’. His deep sleep seem to go with the separation between Adam and his wife.

Genesis 3 seem to explain the last part of Genesis 2. The serpent seem to have been the one who divided the unity of man. He caused man to be lonely. Adam and Eve became lonely after sin; they were hiding and pointing accusating fingers at each other. They were in terrible condition. But God came to them. He put skin (flesh?) on them in order to cover their shameful nudity and send them away out of paradize. This could correspond to the deep sleep the lonely man crossed (or is supposed to cross) in order to (re)descover the unity: since man will leave his parent and join his wife to become one flesh. But even here we have division. Here man still have to ‘leave’ his parents…which is not really complete unity but we still have to deal with divisions…and this is incompatible with God who is love and who unites.

Overall, it seem that united man at the very beginning was in a different realm. But after sin which divided him, God incarnated him into flesh as He was closing the garden of Eden. It seem to me that it is this incarnation in flesh which is described as DEEP SLEEP. Because after this, man suddenly have flesh and is saying to his wife that she is flesh of his flesh.

The tree of good and evil must have caused the united man to idolatry of animal/‘flesh’ symbolized as the serpent. So Adam must have desired to be like animals instead of being like God. So while Adam went through all the animal kind trying to identify with it instead of trying to identify with God, he ended up by become LIKE animal kind. So this is why we look like animals and are part of the animal families even though we are different, very different.

This could also explain why Abel sacrificed animals. God himself had sacrificed animals in order to find skin for the fallen man. So what animals did God sacrifice? could it be some chimpanzee? :D? Are our bodies some mixture of ‘dust’ and some 'Dawkin’s chimpanzee skins?

Later Jesus sacrificed his own human body. And st. Paul teaches us to be at constant warfare with flesh. I am not saying that the human body is bad. As the Cathechism says, there is something good in it. That thing which God will resurrect on the last day.

I think the real body is different. I mean. May be what God meant by telling the serpent that “upon thy breast shalt thou go, and earth shalt thou eat all the days of thy life.” he was referring to our bodies being bound by gravity and depending on plants to survive.

So this mysterious DEEP SLEEP seem to me that it is cosmic. With it we entered into a cosmos which will be destroyed at the final judgment. Why would the universe be destroyed if it was ‘good’ as God want’s it? But God will destroy it and bring about a new heaven and a new earth. Could the final resurrection be the time when we will really wake up with our father Adam?

Does all this make any sens? Did any one hear more detailed explanation about Genesis. I am trying to read Theology of the Body, I try to consider what I read there in my understanding of Genesis, but I would like to hear more view or more explanation of Genesis.

I think understanding of Genesis is fundamental to understanding the meaning of life and making sens of who we are.

God bless
***Hi, nablaise!

…could it not simply be that man was Created in the image and likeness of God: male with no counterpart.

…I think that you are also taking the words out of context; it is not that God saw that something was bad or “evil;” rather, Yahweh God decided to give man a companion that was of his own corporeal composition. Hence, “it is not good that man be alone” with only nature for companionship, is not implying that evil somehow snuck into Creation, which as we all know was all good! 😛

Maran atha!

Angel***
 
*** evil somehow snuck into Creation, which as we all know was all good! 😛

Maran atha!

Angel***
Except that evil did somehow sneak into creation, and got Eve to eat a fruit, remember?

Also remember that the world was already partly fallen: the greatest of the angels fell when he was created.
 
Except that evil did somehow sneak into creation, and got Eve to eat a fruit, remember?
***Hi, Hastrman!

Please note that the point I am making is during Creation… Adam did not become part of something bad because he was Created…

Evil was introduced after Creation, and it originated with Satan not with Yahweh God.
Also remember that the world was already partly fallen: the greatest of the angels fell when he was created.

…this battle happened in the spiritual realm… though it brought dire consequences to the earth, it did so only as an after battle–Satan unwilling to capitulate continued his assault on Christ (the seed) and His brethren (which clearly Adam and Eve are, in a round-about-way, involved); still, Satan himself was Created good not evil–his choices lead him (stealing a line from the movie) to the dark-force! 😃

Maran atha!

Angel
 
***Hi, nablaise!

…could it not simply be that man was Created in the image and likeness of God: male with no counterpart.

…I think that you are also taking the words out of context; it is not that God saw that something was bad or “evil;” rather, Yahweh God decided to give man a companion that was of his own corporeal composition. Hence, “it is not good that man be alone” with only nature for companionship, is not implying that evil somehow snuck into Creation, which as we all know was all good! 😛

Maran atha!

Angel***
Thanks for the reply. But Genesis 1 says that God created man as male and female. This could mean that man = mankind. So both male and female where in man.

I see this as original unity like the unity of the Trinity. When God created us in his image he made us ‘many in one’. So I am thinking that the ‘man’ in Gen 2 is both male and female united as one man.

About the fall of Satan. He was at the highest level of creation and fall to the lowest level of creation, wouldn’t this mean ‘flesh’? may be animal. I am not saying that animals are Satan. But that just as those demons in the Bible asked Jesus to let them go into the nearby folk of porks, so the devils mush have taken possession of animal kind, which is the lowest form of life where they could fall. So this could coencide with the hidden meaning of the ‘serpent’. Because if everything was created good. The serpent must have been good too. But it was may be possessed by Satan?

Or if it is a symbology why would they Genesis say that the curse for it is to be bound on the earth. Could the serpent be a symbol of ‘flesh’? I mean, may be the united couple before sin was not in a flesh form. So they were not bound to gravity. Being bound to gravity seem to be a result of sin. Look at Jesus who did not sin. Or look at the saints who after becoming more and more perfect seem to be released from being bound on gravity. They can levitate, or move like angels. Padre Pio for example.

the first time ‘flesh’ is spoken of in Genesis, was exactly after Adam was put into the deep sleep. God put flesh on Adam to cover from where the rib was taken. So This could mean that first Man had no flesh. But when they separated, flesh was put in place of the removed rib in which God formed into a woman who turned out to be covered with flesh too. And the Adam exclamed, this is ‘flesh of my flesh’.

I am wondering if Man had desired to have flesh like the animals he was just looking at. But this could not be made possible without the separation so, male and female had to be separated in flesh.

But all this could be related to Sin, which would indicated the reason of offering ‘flesh’ for reparation of sins from the beginning.

And Jesus offered his ‘flesh’ to crash forever the head of the serpent. This flesh of man, God-man, couldn’t it be what was just needed to make full reparation for the first Sin?
 
Thanks for the reply. But Genesis 1 says that God created man as male and female. This could mean that man = mankind. So both male and female where in man.

I see this as original unity like the unity of the Trinity. When God created us in his image he made us ‘many in one’. So I am thinking that the ‘man’ in Gen 2 is both male and female united as one man.
***Hi, nablaise!

…there is a doble take on Genesis 1… on the first it says: “…let us make man in our image and likeness…” (v 26); then it expands on v 27 “…male and female…”

I cannot tell you to what extent this could a factor of “inclusive language,” but it seems to me that it is being inclusive. Though the later narrative seems to explain how both male and female were created; Yahweh God creates man from soil, breaths life into it (His Holy Spirit) and man becomes a living creature (Genesis 2:7). God proceeded to create a special place for man and once settled there He then gave him a female counterpart (vs 18-24).
About the fall of Satan. He was at the highest level of creation and fall to the lowest level of creation, wouldn’t this mean ‘flesh’? may be animal. I am not saying that animals are Satan. But that just as those demons in the Bible asked Jesus to let them go into the nearby folk of porks, so the devils mush have taken possession of animal kind, which is the lowest form of life where they could fall.

…this relationship is not shown in Scriptures… God created the angels as spiritual beings… Lucifer and his fallen angels did not cease being spiritual beings… it is how they were able to know Jesus as He walk among humans; and it is their greatest advantage in their battle against Christ as they are able to move beyond the corporeal realm and entise man into surrendering to the flesh (ego, lust, envy, greed…); know also that demons do not only take possession of animals but also of humans which they persuade or deceive into allegiance.
…So this could coencide with the hidden meaning of the ‘serpent’. Because if everything was created good. The serpent must have been good too. But it was may be possessed by Satan?
Or if it is a symbology why would they Genesis say that the curse for it is to be bound on the earth. Could the serpent be a symbol of ‘flesh’?
This too is not clear… though the serpent’s abilities (stealth, tenacity, single-mindedness) could be explained why Satan would choose to possess it; the curse not only falls on Satan but also on the vessel which he used to attempt to undo Creation.
I mean, may be the united couple before sin was not in a flesh form. So they were not bound to gravity. Being bound to gravity seem to be a result of sin. Look at Jesus who did not sin. Or look at the saints who after becoming more and more perfect seem to be released from being bound on gravity. They can levitate, or move like angels. Padre Pio for example.
…here too the Bible is not really forthcoming… we are given to understand that sin only enter the world through Satan’s intervention… but whether Adam and Eve could levitate or go through things (Jesus after the resurrection) it is not even hinted upon… what they did have was infant-like understanding of their sexual nature.
the first time ‘flesh’ is spoken of in Genesis, was exactly after Adam was put into the deep sleep. God put flesh on Adam to cover from where the rib was taken. So This could mean that first Man had no flesh. But when they separated, flesh was put in place of the removed rib in which God formed into a woman who turned out to be covered with flesh too. And the Adam exclamed, this is ‘flesh of my flesh’.
I am wondering if Man had desired to have flesh like the animals he was just looking at. But this could not be made possible without the separation so, male and female had to be separated in flesh.
But all this could be related to Sin, which would indicated the reason of offering ‘flesh’ for reparation of sins from the beginning.
…I know what you mean… but you have to note that in this particular reference “flesh” is not equated with sin nor as sin-offering… it is an addendum to Creation… noticed Adam’s exortation as Eve is presented? He was in a deep sleep so he could not have known what was transpiring and Yahweh God did not give him an explanation before or after the Creation of Eve… but Adam knew exactly what had happened… this, I suspect, is due to their pre-fall existence: their spirit was able to communicate better with God’s own Spirit–if only they would have been better listeners! 😛
And Jesus offered his ‘flesh’ to crash forever the head of the serpent. This flesh of man, God-man, couldn’t it be what was just needed to make full reparation for the first Sin?
Exactly!.. but not just for that original condition but for all sin, once and for all! …that’s why Scriptures says “…death, where is your victory?”

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Technically I think the word for “man” as in “mankind” and “man” as in “male human” are wholly different words in Hebrew–although I think both are masculine nouns.

In most languages, they’re not the same word. In Japanese, for instance, “man” as in “person” is hito, while man as in “male” is otoko. Actually to be polite you say otoko no hito: a male person.

I think Man as in person is “Adamah” in Hebrew; I don’t think I know what it is as in “male”.
 
Dear Nablaise,

You’ve got some interesting questions and I think you are right on the money in questioning the one version of the creation of mankind, in which the creation of Eve is delayed.

The Bible says that God’s ways are so different from our ways, as the heavens are above the earth. I don’t like to speculate on things like gravity, which isn’t discussed in Genesis.

The Catholic Church says there are several ‘senses’ of scripture. There’s the literal and the spiritual sense. And, the spiritual sense is divided into the allegorical, moral, and anagogical. These are discussed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

You may come to some equilibrium with your own questions, if you start describing what the text of Genesis actually says. Adam is created from the earth and God breathes life into him. And, of course, a big difference, is that Eve is created from the flesh of Adam.

Why would God say that it was not “good” for man to be alone? It was not “good” because God knew He wasn’t done with creation. And, after the creation of Eve and such, Genesis says that God looked at everything and declared that it was “very” good. So, we have to keep with God’s standard here, not our own. In the literal sense, we’re talking about Adam and why it was not good for HIM to be alone. In the spiritual sense, we may be talking about why it is not good for ANY man to be alone. After all, the scripture was written to teach us and inspire us and guide us.

So, whatever else happens, we see that Genesis uses this path of creation to explain how God brought man and woman together, and that in a special way, to be united in body, for sure.

Scripture says that Adam was created outside of the garden and God took him there. I think Eve is shown as being created specially IN the garden of Eden. Everything in Eden was not sufficient for man until Eve had been created.

The deep sleep you talk about is a whole special topic. If you look into a Strong’s concordance (I don’t know the Catholic equivalent of Strong’s, if there is one, i.e. an exhaustive concordance), you will see that this deep sleep is something special that was a sleep that was close to death itself – surely not ordinary sleep.

Recall, too, that this was the sixth day of creation. Now, picture that Christ underwent a deep sleep, death in fact, on a Friday, which was the sixth day of the week. What came from Adam was the flesh from which Eve was made. What came from Christ was the substance, his body and blood, from which the Church is formed.

Certainly, there are parallels between Adam and Christ discussed in the New Testament. While I would like to take credit for discovering this parallel, apparently it was a parallel that was noted by the early Church fathers, as well, long ago.

We should approach the study of scripture first with the prayer to the Holy Spirit Who is the inspiration for the writing. As Pope Benedict XVI says in his book Jesus of Nazareth, our best understanding comes when we approach scripture with faith.

Faith is different than imagination, but imagination is useful to drive us to ask questions and stay “tuned” to search for the answer that the Spirit has for us. We must always be open to the guidance of the Church, which is the Teacher that Christ appointed for us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top