Did Jesus have a brother?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lost_Sheep
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, but n the culture, extended family (like cousins) were also referred to as brother.
Kind of like us Spanish folks who call everybody our “primo” or “comadre”.

As has been said, the fact that Jesus entrusted care of His mother to St. John perfectly illustrates that he had no immediate male relative. For that culture, a woman possessed or owned nothing. She would have been homeless and worse. John certainly was needed to ensure Mary had a life after Jesus’ death.
God bless you, good to see you!
 
  1. The Meaning of Brother
The first thing to understand is that the term brother (Gk. adelphos) has a broader meaning than uterine brothers. It can mean a biological brother, but it can also mean an extended relative, or even a spiritual brother.

Take Genesis 13:8 for example. Here the word brother is being used to describe the relationship between Abraham and Lot, who were not biological brothers but uncle and nephew:

“So Abram said to Lot, “Let’s not have any quarreling between you and me, or between your herdsmen and mine, for we are brothers” (Gen 13:8, NIV; see also 14:12).

Because of the Bible’s broad semantic range of “brother,” we can rest assured that although St. Paul writes, “[Jesus] appeared to more than five hundred…brothers at the same time” (1 Cor. 15:6), we need not infer from this verse that Mary gave birth to more than 500 children!
  1. Children of Mary?
These “brothers” are never once called the children of Mary, although Jesus himself is (John 2:1; Acts 1:14).
  1. Other Women Named Mary
James and Joseph (also called Joses), who are called Jesus’ “brothers” (Mark 6:3) are indeed the children of Mary—Just not Mary, the mother of Jesus.

After St. Matthew’s account of the crucifixion and death of Jesus, he writes:

“There were also many women there, looking on from afar, who had followed Jesus from Galilee, ministering to him; among who were Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James and Joseph, and the mother of the sons of Zebedee.” (Matt. 27:56; see also Mark 15:40).
  1. Consensus of the Early Church
The earliest explanation of the “brothers” of the Lord is found in a document known as the Protoevangelium of James, which was written around A.D. 150. It speaks of Mary as a consecrated virgin since her youth, and of St. Joseph as an elderly widower with children who was chosen to be Mary’s spouse for the purposes of guarding and protecting her while respecting her vow of virginity. Though this document is not on the level of Sacred Scripture, it was written very early, and it may contain accurate historical traditions.

Allow me to limit myself to three quotes from the early Church:

Athanasius of Alexandria

“Therefore let those who deny that the Son is from the Father by nature and proper to his essence deny also that he took true human flesh of Mary Ever-Virgin [Four Discourses Against the Arians 2:70 (c. A.D. 360)].

St. Jerome

“You say that Mary did not continue a virgin: I claim still more that Joseph himself, on account of Mary was a virgin, so that from a virgin wedlock a virgin son was born [Perpetual Virginity of Blessed Mary 21 (A.D. 383)].

Pope St. Leo I

“The origin is different but the nature alike: not by intercourse with man but by the power of God was it brought about: for a Virgin conceived, a Virgin bore, and a Virgin she remained [Sermons 22:2 (A.D. 450)].
 
Sooo… not worried or concerned with the liberal media news story you shared. .
 
The ossuary has the inscription “brother of Jesus,” not “Jesus of Nazareth” or “Jesus Christ.” It wasn’t necessarily him.
 
In November 2002, the world was captivated by the biggest archaeological discovery ever made relating to Jesus: a 2,000 year-old ossuary – or bone box – bearing the tantalizing inscription in Aramaic: “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus.”

cnn.com/2015/03/11/living/jesus-brother-james/index.html
This is an example of the media distorting facts to make things appear to be something which they are not.

The box itself was determined to be a forgery.

Besides that:

No 2,000 year old artifact could ever bear the Aramaic inscription “brother of Jesus.”

The name “Jesus” is (of course) the English version of the name. That name would not exist for centuries.

His actual name was Yeshua (in modern form, Joshua).

The name James in Aramaic is Ya-oob (or Jacob)

So there’s an ossuary box (a forged one) of someone named Jacob who had a brother named Joshua and a father named Joseph. Interesting coincidence. Nothing more. All 3 were very common Jewish male names.
 
Personally I get really tired of articles such as this promoting the idea that the Blessed Virgin Mary was not perpetually a virgin. She most definitely was a virgin her entire life and the only child she ever had was Jesus Christ. James was Jesus’ cousin, not his brother and not his step-brother. It was common practice at the time to refer to cousins and other extended family as brothers.
 
By the way, I’ve always wanted to ask this of people who claim that James was the actual brother of Jesus:

Which James do you mean?

James the son of Alphaeus and brother of Matthew? or James the son of Zebedee and brother of John?
 
By the way, I’ve always wanted to ask this of people who claim that James was the actual brother of Jesus:

Which James do you mean?

James the son of Alphaeus and brother of Matthew? or James the son of Zebedee and brother of John?
Snap! I was just thinking of this. We are studying Acts, and in Chap 12 or 13, there is a James of Jerusalem too!!
 
Snap! I was just thinking of this. We are studying Acts, and in Chap 12 or 13, there is a James of Jerusalem too!!
The same James son of Alphaeus. First bishop of Jerusalem.

Alphaues (Aramaic) = Cleophas (Greek)

His brothers were Joseph, Simon and Judas.

James the Just. James the Lesser. James the Younger. Etc. etc…
 
The same James son of Alphaeus. First bishop of Jerusalem.

Alphaues (Aramaic) = Cleophas (Greek)

His brothers were Joseph, Simon and Judas.

James the Just. James the Lesser. James the Younger. Etc. etc…
Thanks. I was wondering if it was one of those. My footnotes (NAB) did not say.

Do you have a blog or FB page where I could follow you?
 
Whether or not Jesus had a brother, the archaeological discovery was a hoax.
 
I believe they are speaking of neither, but of “James, the brother of Jesus” as referenced in Josephus’ The Antiquities of the Jews, written approx 93AD (which may be earlier than the writing date of the gospel called John).

.
I am not sure of your point here. Mark, whose Gospel was written about 66-70 BC, mentions James as the brother of Jesus too.
Mark 6:3
b Is he not the carpenter,* the son of Mary, and the brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon? And are not his sisters here with us?” And they took offense at him.
As FrDavid96 wrote, James was the son of Alpheus.
Originally Posted by FrDavid96 View Post
The same James son of Alphaeus. First bishop of Jerusalem.
Alphaues (Aramaic) = Cleophas (Greek)
His brothers were Joseph, Simon and Judas.
James the Just. James the Lesser. James the Younger. Etc. etc…
 
By the way, sources don’t exactly agree on the brothers of James (son of Alphaeus).
 
I believe they are speaking of neither, but of “James, the brother of Jesus” as referenced in Josephus’ The Antiquities of the Jews, written approx 93AD (which may be earlier than the writing date of the gospel called John).
.
None of the gospels reference the seminal event of the 1st Century, the destruction of the Temple. Therefore, all the Gospels were written before 70 AD. 🙂 Rob
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top