Did Jesus help people at the wedding of Cana get drunk?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SacredHeartBassist
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Even at the Wedding at Cana, people had free will.

Let’s say there is a giant Mass for thousands of people, so, much wine is consecrated. After Mass, there are hundreds of partially full chalices which must be consumed. If one person tries to consume all of that wine, even though it is transubstantiated, they could likely get alcohol poisoning!
 
I think it was while they poured it because the filled to the brim.
You can have your own opinion:grinning:.
 
If you want to look into the event a little deeper, look at how Jesus softly rebuked His mother Mary yet did so obediently and with love…because He is sinless…He had to obey the Law and obey His parents, yet it was not time for Him to reveal who He really was…so he had to do as Mary asked without interfering with the Divine plan.

A sticky wicket Jesus handled with aplomb.
 
Last edited:
God’s plan was perfect.

What Jesus was saying to his mother was more likely “Mom, you realize that this is the beginning of the end of my earthly life, don’t you? Just remember this, because now everything changes.”
 
John 2:3-4 New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (NRSVCE)

3 When the wine gave out, the mother of Jesus said to him, “They have no wine.” 4 And Jesus said to her, “Woman, what concern is that to you and to me? My hour has not yet come.”

Sure…if you think that is what He is saying…sure…
 
Last edited:
I imagine He helped them drink responsibly… and yes, intoxicated some! 🤣
 
Last edited:
Noah got drunk, he was known as the first vineyard farmer.

Remember all that fuss with his sons ?
 
The sin there was the disrespect exhibited by one son.
 
Last edited:
Bottle fermented.
More likely bottle-conditioned, I would think (which gives you that yeast ring that gets rolled back in before serving).

Bottle fermented beer would be truly disgusting . . . but would sure keep you regular 😜🤣

However, when desperately short on time in grad school, I did ferment in the serving keg. All grain, whole hops in a bag, and a wort chiller (quickly drops the temp after boiling). I put a blowoff tube on the gas line for two or three days, then removed it. It ended up carbonated about right (and I coulda just that from the tank as needed). We blew off the first pint, then a couple more ounces, and then it was clear.

hawk
 
Unfortunately, I don’t have much to add to what has already been said. Getting drunk on such a festive and prolonged occasion is hardly considered sinful.
 
Bottle fermented beer is yummy! Try some of the Belgian brews. It’s a secondary fermentation.

Bottle fermented wine can be nice too, but you can get a very unstable cellar situation.
 
Last edited:
Yes, however it exhibits that humankind was getting inebriated since very early times.
We must also remember some people can become inebriated on one glass, others much more
 
I’ve always thought of it as somewhat of an “I’m sorry” present. Only Christ was invited to the wedding but his twelve apostles tagged along and kind of gatecrashed. I wouldn’t be surprised if the couple getting married had enough wine originally, but didn’t account for twelve somewhat unrefined individuals (lets face it, many of them were gruff fishermen) showing up and drinking all the wine. The couple showed charity and welcomed the extra guests. Christ seemed to be simply fulfilling the need which the good deed of the couple created. It somewhat makes more sense as to why Mary went to Jesus for more wine. I wouldn’t be surprised if there is a silent ‘mother glare’ saying “Your friends got the poor couple into this mess. Fix it!” which is not recorded in the Gospels.
 
Last edited:
It was top class wine and there was loads of it.
Jesus never made anybody drunk since as you possibly know, only you can do that to yourself.
 
Last edited:
Bottle fermented beer is yummy! Try some of the Belgian brews. It’s a secondary fermentation.
I think you’re crossing “bottle fermented” with “bottle conditioned”.

Bottle conditioned beer ferments the last bit to produce the carbonation in the bottle. This has the added benefit of consuming the oxygen in the air at the top of the bottle, which would otherwise start spoiling the beer. Once it has nothing left to ferment, the yeast falls out and forms the yeast ring (which we try not to pour with the beer, except for hefeweissen, for which we attempt to dislodge it first so that it does get in the poured beer). While this is technically a secondary–or more likely tertiary–fermentation, it is not what we generally mean by the term.

Bottled home-brew is almost always bottle conditioned.

The primary fermentation of a beer lasts about three to seven days, in which many things fall out of solution. The beer is then drained from this to another fermenter for the secondary fermentation, largely to get it off of that crud. It is fully fermented before bottling. More crud falls out in the secondary.

For a bottle conditioned beer, either a bit of fresh unfermented beer from another batch, a bit of reserved wort (unfermented beer), or sugar is added to give the yeast something to ferment for carbonation.

If you actually tried the secondary fermentation in the bottle, rather than conditioning, there would be a serious risk of the bottle blowing from the released CO2. You would also have a bunch of red, rather than just yeast, at the bottom.

hawk
 
…sorry, I apologize for not recognizing that you were blue blood and/or majestic. Mea, culpa (I miss the old emos).

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top