Hi Mary, I agree that first hand eye witness testimony of the events would be powerful evidence. However we personally have never seen God, Jesus, the devil, angels or demons, or witnessed miracles such as ascending by physical levitation into the sky. We have to rely on third hand reports by unknown people. This can make it difficult to believe the validity of the evidence.
I’m a biomedical scientist, so your post is germane to my life. Here are my thoughts, take them or leave them.
It’s important that when reading the Gospels, we not retroject our modern scientific (or scientistic) worldview. If you take modern medicine and science as the judge of their contents, you will quickly find the Gospels to be hopelessly antiquated. There’s plenty else that you can point to within the Gospels or the rest of the Bible to show that Jesus, Paul, Moses, Jeremiah, or any of the prophets didn’t know what they were talking about (e.g., that light inside you during the day – e.g., John 11:9-10). And very quickly, you can come to see that ancient people were stupid, superstitious, and not worth listening to.
The problem with that is that ancient people were not stupid. They knew that people didn’t rise from the dead. They knew that people with leprosy didn’t spontaneously heal. In first-century Roman Palestine, Jews grew up with a long history of rigorous legal and scriptural analysis (
halakha and
haggadah, respectively) of “the law and the prophets” (the Hebrew scriptures). They had exposure to Cynic, Stoic, and other pagan philosophies.
From a strict historical-critical perspective, we can say that independent sources (i.e., Synoptic parallels, material unique to Luke, John) attest that Jesus was able to heal people in an era prior to modern medicine. How, we don’t really know. But we do know that most critical historians say that Jesus was able to draw large crowds, and that people followed him. Many historians say that Jesus’ mysterious ability to heal, which Mark calls demonic exorcism, may have been one of the reasons for why Jesus gained such notoriety.
Was Jesus a lunatic? Well, as C.S. Lewis put it in his “trilemma,” was Jesus lunatic, liar, or lord? And you can ask – if Jesus was a lunatic or a liar, would he have drawn such crowds? Would his closest disciples have left home and family to follow him? Would the Roman governor of Judea have executed him in the fashion reserved for slave insurrectionists?
I encourage you to ask these kinds of questions. I think your posting here is a good start.