Hadn’t worked how?JonNC:
I think that’s an easy out for not wanting to explain why it hasn’t workedSola scriptura is not a theology. It is a hermeneutical principle.
Hadn’t worked how?JonNC:
I think that’s an easy out for not wanting to explain why it hasn’t workedSola scriptura is not a theology. It is a hermeneutical principle.
No, Judaism doesn’t and didn’t work that way. It’s a Christian problem not a Jewish problem.I’ve been wondering, though - did the Jews themselves follow this kind of Sola Scriptura theology?
Rampant division?AYKM?
Rampant division!
That “principle” destroys the credibility of Christianity as it can no longer be defined.
Everyone of them an offshoot of Rome, far more so than Lutheranism.Look outside the window. There are indisoutably - indisputably - hundreds** if not multiple thousands of other ‘bible alone’ denominations out there. Calvinism. Zwingliites. Mennonites. Wesleyans. A new one every week in the US.
One, by which we believe one becomes a member via baptism.224 minimum per the (Protestant) “Handbook of Christian Denominations.”
How many did our Lord found again???
Are you familiar with that quote?But in subsequent centuries much more serious dissensions appeared and large communities became separated from full communion with the Catholic Church - for which, often enough, men of both sides were to blame."
What does anything you’ve said had to do with it?What does any of this have to do with the manner in which Christ founded His Church and directed that it should be perpetuated?
No, of course he didn’t. Sola Scriptura doesn’t say that all oral tradition or whatever other term you want to use is not to be used. It says that the scriptures are the norm by which these are judged because it is the word of God preserved and handed down. What we do see however, is this is the normative means by which Jesus judged these other sources of authority. Delegated authority is always provided with inherent limits. When Joseph managed his master’s house, he knew that didn’t mean he gets to sleep with his master’s wife. He was to run the household in accord with his master’s will. The same goes for the teaching authority of the Church. The Church has the authority and responsibility to proclaim and teach what God handed down. It doesn’t have the authority to change that teaching or add to it in a way that contradicts what God had handed down. And as Christ showed us, the fact that one is given the authority to teach, doesn’t mean that the authority to teach means it is impervious to reproof and correction through the proclamation of God’s word.He didn’t disprove of all oral tradition and extra-scriptural teaching authority, though, right? He rebuked the abuse of korban, and said that they did “many other such things” but I think he was just rebuking man-made doctrines being taught that nullified the Word of God. He seemed to tolerate the teaching authority of the Pharisees, when He said that they sat on the “chair of Moses” and for the people to do what they taught (but not as they do).
I know this has been hashed out plenty but can you guys tell me what scripture explicitly teaches the Trinity? I know of many that teach it implicitly but im asking for explicit teaching.
Peace!!!
By teachings do you mean doctrine? If so, I see the point. Scripture is the final norm for doctrine.Whatever you want to call it, my church teaches that anything not explicitly found in Scripture cannot form the basis of any teachings.
Whatever you want to call it, my church teaches that anything not explicitly found in Scripture cannot form the basis of any teachings. Like
Scripture also doesn’t exclude or deny these. Properly understood, none of these distract the from the Gospel, in my view, and can be reasonable pious beliefs, though the conscience of the believer is not bound to them.Like praying for the dead, praying to saints, purgatory, Assumption of Mary, or her sinlessness and perpetual virginity, etc. These aren’t explicitly explained or elaborated on, so it rules them out.
Whatever you want to call it, my church teaches that anything not explicitly found in Scripture cannot form the basis of any teachings.
I know this has been hashed out plenty but can you guys tell me what scripture explicitly teaches the Trinity? I know of many that teach it implicitly but im asking for explicit teaching.By teachings do you mean doctrine? If so, I see the point. Scripture is the final norm for doctrine.
This is an interesting question.
Thanks for posting it.
Even if you need to defend the belief as the church did at Nicaea in 325?There’s not an urge to explicitly define everything or get into much theology.
There is no single scripture since the Trinity is a compilation of observations about the nature of God that we see in Scripture. Honestly, a great resource (you will hate the source) that does what are you asking in a pretty concise book is The Forgotten Trinity. It breaks down the doctrine into its component parts and provides scriptural support for those parts. The doctrine of the Trinity has been defended for millenia using scripture, so there are volumes and volumes of books on the subject.I know this has been hashed out plenty but can you guys tell me what scripture explicitly teaches the Trinity? I know of many that teach it implicitly but im asking for explicit teaching.
No not really. If it had there would be no need for the early councils.There are entire books on this subject. Not sure why this is a mystery since the Trinity has been a doctrine that has been defended using Scripture for millenia.