W
why_me
Guest
What does this mean?well there you have it…
why me tells you you can’t believe anyone…so the BoM is true.![]()
What does this mean?well there you have it…
why me tells you you can’t believe anyone…so the BoM is true.![]()
Everything is irrelevant in this postmodern secular world. For such a philosophy the relevance is only found in today. And for the secular postmodernist the catholic church is irrelevant unless of course it takes regressive stances on abortion, gay rights and other idenity causes.my point is even simpler: mormonism is irrelevant.
who you preaching to whyme? I spent decades as an atheist. my relativism was fine tuned.Everything is irrelevant in this postmodern secular world. For such a philosophy the relevance is only found in today. And for the secular postmodernist the catholic church is irrelevant unless of course it takes regressive stances on abortion, gay rights and other idenity causes.
Never get too comfortable with feeling relevant. You may find that actually most people in this world just may think that the catholic church is irrelevant too.![]()
And yours a brilliant mix of logical fallacies.Mormonism is God’s only true Church in the world today. Historical Christianity is apostate. Mormonism is a restoration of the original Church of Christ. It is apostates form Mormonism who are truly irrelevant. They carry no clout and no credibility in the world; and they are “despised by those who have flattered them” (D&C 121:20).
zerinus
Thank YouAnd yours a brilliant mix of logical fallacies.
This is why people tell mormons that you don’t answer the question.
Learn how to present an argument, or stop wasting our time.
You made a statement: Mormonism is irrelevant. I tried to point out that for many so called catholics and other people not catholics, catholicism is also irrelevant. What we should be doing is making faith relevant and not beating each other help with judgemental posts.who you preaching to whyme? I spent decades as an atheist. my relativism was fine tuned.
when i decided to “find God”, that relativism was still in tact. But whyme, the more I learn about Christ and His teaching, the more I am not a relativist.
So yeah, I agree with you. Religion is becoming more irrelevant for more and more people. Personally, I’m headed the other direction.
But that wasn’t my point. This is called a red herring.
Thank you. This will help me better apprehend, and perhaps even comprehend, from where you are coming. I should amend the statement of the premises you hold thus:…I would express some of them differently:
I would say that is true.
I would rather express it differently: A person who knows the truth by the power of the Spirit of God, knows that he knows the truth, and is not deceived.
See my previous answer.
I would express that differently too: A person can only know that the writers of the NT are credible witnesses by the testimony of the Holy Ghost.
Yes, I suppose I could go along with that—except to add that the knowledge of the reality of both can only come to one by the testimony of the Holy Ghost. Those who are not experienced in spiritual things may not always know that what they know comes by the witness of the Spirit of God. But that testimony can only come from that source, whether the person realizes it or not.
zerinus
Yes, Holden, but the question is how do you know gravity exists?That makes no sense. It’s just a play on words. I may know in my heart that gravity doesn’t exist. But guess what gravity does exist. No matter how much you want something to change or want to believe something wrong you can’t change the truth. That’s the nature of truth.
Then it would be good for me to learn all i can from you, my friend Zer, for if what i believe is a lie, then i might become better off for having met you.Mormonism is God’s only true Church in the world today. Historical Christianity is apostate. Mormonism is a restoration of the original Church of Christ. It is apostates form Mormonism who are truly irrelevant. They carry no clout and no credibility in the world; and they are “despised by those who have flattered them” (D&C 121:20).
zerinus
Catholicism and the Catholic Church are inextricably entwined with the social and political history of much of the world for the past 2,000 years or so. Catholicism has had an effect on everyone living right now, either directly or indirectly. We are who we are now largely because of the efforts of the Catholic Church. To say that Catholicism is irrelevant is to state a position of ignorance, to put it bluntly.You made a statement: Mormonism is irrelevant. I tried to point out that for many so called catholics and other people not catholics, catholicism is also irrelevant.
…
Relevancy is in the eye of the beholder.
Great - so when are you going to start?What we should be doing is making faith relevant and not beating each other help with judgemental posts.
I have started already but perhaps not enough on this forum. Most of my posts counter the anitmormonism on this section of the forum. My message: start from commonality and not difference.Great - so when are you going to start?
Not really. To say that catholicm is irrelevant to many cradle catholics is very relevant since that it is true. It is also true that catholicm has been around for a very long time. And yes, it has done good work in this world of ours. No, problem from me on that one. But as the pope knows all too well, secularism is very popular in Europe. The battle is not with mormons and the lds church but with a philosophy that delegates life to its natural desires: eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow you die! type of approach.Catholicism and the Catholic Church are inextricably entwined with the social and political history of much of the world for the past 2,000 years or so. Catholicism has had an effect on everyone living right now, either directly or indirectly. We are who we are now largely because of the efforts of the Catholic Church. To say that Catholicism is irrelevant is to state a position of ignorance, to put it bluntly.
Methinks, my good friend Soc, that you are too much obsessed with the Platonic dialog, and you are trying to win a “Socratic” argument against me! I regret to have to inform you, my dear friend Soc, that I am not interested in that at all! The only thing that I would “agree with” is that I have the testimony of the Holy Ghost, beyond the possibility of doubt or deception, that the Book of Mormon is true, is a volume of sacred scripture, and is the word of God; and that you may know the same if you would seek it in sincerity, and in the prayer of faith. Beyond that I have nothing further to say to you.Do you agree, Zer, that since (A2), (B2), (D2) and (E2) are always true, then (A3), (B3), (D3) and (E3) must always be false? This appears to me to be the truth that is gleaned from what you are saying to me. Does this sound reasonable to you, Zer?
I sincerely hope that you have been better off for having met me. I think I have been better off for having met you.Then it would be good for me to learn all i can from you, my friend Zer, for if what i believe is a lie, then i might become better off for having met you.
![]()
My statements weren’t regarding what the world thinks of either mormonism or catholicism. It is the relationship between the two faiths. You chose to address something I never brought up.You made a statement: Mormonism is irrelevant. I tried to point out that for many so called catholics and other people not catholics, catholicism is also irrelevant. What we should be doing is making faith relevant and not beating each other help with judgemental posts.
Relevancy is in the eye of the beholder.
Not really whyme. Mormonism is just as much a threat to Christianity as secularism. If not more so.Not really. To say that catholicm is irrelevant to many cradle catholics is very relevant since that it is true. It is also true that catholicm has been around for a very long time. And yes, it has done good work in this world of ours. No, problem from me on that one. But as the pope knows all too well, secularism is very popular in Europe. The battle is not with mormons and the lds church but with a philosophy that delegates life to its natural desires: eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow you die! type of approach.
And so, yes, in Scandinavia, catholicism is irrelevant as it is in many parts of germany, estonia, russia, greece and a host of other non-catholic european countries. And in many catholic countries such as Ireland, the church is becoming more irrelevant. Now that should be a concern for catholics. But it seems that we do have catholics on this forum that persistantly seem occupied with the lds church while ‘rome’ (not the vatican) burns.
You are completely missing my point. The number of active Catholics in the world right now does not change the fact that the Catholic Church was and remains one of the most important forces in the ongoing history of the world, especially in Europe. The Catholic Church is not “irrelevant.” To argue otherwise is to argue a position of ignorance, to repeat myself.Not really. To say that catholicm is irrelevant to many cradle catholics is very relevant since that it is true. It is also true that catholicm has been around for a very long time. And yes, it has done good work in this world of ours. No, problem from me on that one. But as the pope knows all too well, secularism is very popular in Europe. The battle is not with mormons and the lds church but with a philosophy that delegates life to its natural desires: eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow you die! type of approach.
And so, yes, in Scandinavia, catholicism is irrelevant as it is in many parts of germany, estonia, russia, greece and a host of other non-catholic european countries. And in many catholic countries such as Ireland, the church is becoming more irrelevant. Now that should be a concern for catholics. But it seems that we do have catholics on this forum that persistantly seem occupied with the lds church while ‘rome’ (not the vatican) burns.
And what is the BASIC commonality, whyme?I have started already but perhaps not enough on this forum. Most of my posts counter the anitmormonism on this section of the forum. My message: start from commonality and not difference.![]()
And yours a brilliant mix of logical fallacies.
Amen, Rebecca!This is why people tell mormons that you don’t answer the question.
Robert
Me thinks, dear Zer, that i am saddened to find that you have slandered me, and the one i admire, without just cause. For Socrates’ goal i life was never to win arguments but to win (or acquire) wisdom and truth about himself and the God he sought to know. It was Socrates who said:Methinks, my good friend Soc, that you are too much obsessed with the Platonic dialog, and you are trying to win a “Socratic” argument against me! I regret to have to inform you, my dear friend Soc, that I am not interested in that at all! The only thing that I would “agree with” is that I have the testimony of the Holy Ghost, beyond the possibility of doubt or deception, that the Book of Mormon is true, is a volume of sacred scripture, and is the word of God; and that you may know the same if you would seek it in sincerity, and in the prayer of faith. Beyond that I have nothing further to say to you. …