Code:
***Matthew 26:24** The Son of Man indeed goes, as it is written of him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed. It would be better for that man if he had never been born." It would seem rather harsh of Jesus to say this of someone who was carrying out His orders.*
There was something about this scriptural quote that I couldn’t place my finger on. Then it occured to me. Jesus speaks of his roll in the prophecy making reference to it, but you will note he doesn’t state Judas’s reference …
Code:
.... but woe to the man by whom, **as it is written of him**, the Son of man is betrayed, It would be better....
The betrayer is also a planned member of the cast.
So then in entirety and in consideration of the prophecy we have…
The Son of Man indeed goes, as it is written of him, but woe to that man by whom,
as it is written of him, the Son of Man is betrayed. It would be better for that man if he had never been born."
YinYangMom:
That really does seem to spell things out, doesn’t it?
But the free will thing then creeps in…what if Judas had chosen not to betray Jesus???
It’s easier to press the view in the positive. Eliminate Judas from the picture by agreeing to everyone’s desire that Judas make the right choice, then continue with the redemption scene that must occur. We are faced with a paradoxial brick wall. The problem of a righteous Judas(or righteous anyone-potential-betrayer) becomes clearer this way.
YinYangMom:
Why warn him so harshly if it carried with it the possibility of changing Judas’ mind?
Indeed!. At the last supper telling someone to “do what you have to do” is a sign of resignation. However a plead for one’s life would include anywhere from the mild detached warning “I wouldn’t do that if I were you” to the extreme salvific “please don’t do it!!!”.
A review is required here. Judas planned this all along. Make no mistake about it, he did accept money for betraying his master. Judas should have requested clarity and approval, but his plan was to put Jesus on the spot so he would call his angels to save the Jews under oppression. The question is to the separate incidences and the role of a betrayer.
Yes, the rest of your post makes good points.
It almost seems an obligation to role play good guy, bad guy as Christians. But I have always had problems doing so. Perhaps I feel even that is unChristian. Even the negation of him as fanned the fuel of hatred to satans delight. The Nazis used this reason on many occasions to persecute the Jews, and even in my childhood the children were cruel at times…
We can pray for him like anyone else, and live in faith one day it will all come clear. But we must remember he did sacrificed because we are Judases in our own way.
Andy