I was thinking in this direction as well, but my thought was that she remembered the events and told them to at least one of the Apostles. If she didn’t then we would never have known about them. There was nobody at the incarnation but Mary and the Holy Spirit (maybe Jesus could be considered as being there as well). There were no Apostles until 30 years later, and they were probably born about the same time as Jesus, so wouldn’t remember anyway.
Paar’s religion is solely based on the Quran and he thinks (wrongly) that Christianity is solely based on the Bible. He thinks that he could take away the divinity of Jesus by citing Mary’s silence on the issue in scripture. His question isn’t nonsense, but what is a little puzzling is why he’s putting so much weight in scripture. If scripture is full of errors, why cite it at all?pprim,
I’m trying to figure out why paar asked this question. Maybe it was to find out what we actually know about the Mother of God.
Ask him what he believes. Answer his question with a question When the question is nonsense to begin with.why waste your time.
God bless,
jean8
Nope, Paar also believes in things other than Quran such as the work of Mirzha Ghulam Ahmad (his ProphetMessenger), D. F. Strauss (because he supports the idea that Jesus did not die at the cross and escaped to India), Dan Brown (because he believes that Jesus should have married), and your own writing (if you said that Mirzha Ghulam Ahmad was Jesus who came again to this world).
steve,.