B
Bookcat
Guest
Who cares what TIME said. They are simply some secular popular periodical.What about what TIME said?
Who cares what TIME said. They are simply some secular popular periodical.What about what TIME said?
Can you link me to any secular sources that say he existed?
You can contact Catholic Answers apologists for such - I do not have such for it is not a matter of concern - there is no question that he existed and exists.Can you link me to any secular sources that say he existed?
I wrote Ask an Apologist but doubt I’ll hear back from them.You can contact Catholic Answers apologists for such - I do not have such for it is not a matter of concern - there is no question that he existed and exists.
What is important is not what some popular periodical says but what the Sacred Scriptures and the Church says. Popular magazines are written often to sell stories and if something is attention grabbing popular magazines will publish them. Such theories are simply non-reality based. And so often secular sources get so much wrong in the area of the Church - if news persons writing religion stories would write sports stories they would be fired long ago for lack of good research etc.
Though I can understand your wish to have the other sources for apologetical reasons if you run across someone who as read that popular magazine -the staff there can some sources for you- give them a call.
But it quoted experts in the field of archaeology etc.You can contact Catholic Answers apologists for such - I do not have such for it is not a matter of concern - there is no question that he existed and exists.
What is important is not what some popular periodical says but what the Sacred Scriptures and the Church says. Popular magazines are written often to sell stories and if something is attention grabbing popular magazines will publish them. Such theories are simply non-reality based. And so often secular sources get so much wrong in the area of the Church - if news persons writing religion stories would write sports stories they would be fired long ago for lack of good research etc.
Some are not worth the sand they walk on…But it quoted experts in the field of archaeology etc.
I’m a little offended, as I am one of the people that edits Wikipedia to make sure it has accurate informationI wouldn’t believe anything in this wikipedia article about as far as I can throw an elephant. The Bible is the inspired word of God and historical divine revelation given principally to the Israelites, God’s chosen people, to prepare for the coming of Jesus; this wikipedia article is uninspired imagination. Textual or higher criticism is a theory, not a fact. What the Bible says is what the Bible says. Moses appeared with Jesus along with the prophet Elijah in the transfiguration vision when Jesus took Peter, James, and John up the mountain. Jesus also mentions Moses a number of times in the gosples and about what he, Moses, wrote, i.e, part of the Holy Scriptures such as the Law which refers to the Pentateuch. Yes, Moses existed and the Exodus is a fact of history and divine revelation concerning God’s chosen people.We ought not be suprised that unbelievers say otherwise. These same unbelievers will question whether Jesus actually existed and if he did the miracles he performed and his resurrection are myth. The only myth we have here is the myth of this wikipedia article.
Is the first one from the Discovery Channel?It’s a Discovery Channel documentary. On youtube I noticed they have some from National Geographic and also History Channel as well. I haven’t watched them so I don’t know what they say though. I did watch this one several years ago. I personally liked it
m.youtube.com/watch?v=nQevxiAs1BA
m.youtube.com/watch?v=XIvDLOcLuGo
m.youtube.com/watch?v=qB-2VRdGBFM
A lot of people are against anything Wiki says. I’m on the fence about it. When I want a quick answer, I’ll sometimes turn to Wiki.I’m a little offended, as I am one of the people that edits Wikipedia to make sure it has accurate information
It just says New Episode D (with a picture of a spinning Earth on it). I now see that all three are from the same video. Are all of them from the Discovery Channel?Is the first one from the Discovery Channel?
If I linked them correctly (I’m not good at this stuff) then yes. It is one documentary in three parts about 10-15 mins each.It just says New Episode D (with a picture of a spinning Earth on it). I now see that all three are from the same video. Are all of them from the Discovery Channel?
Dumb question but is this the same discovery channel from tv?They should be called biblical mysteries explained. Discovery channel has several biblical mysteries explained dicumentaries. This one is about Exodus. I could only find it in parts so I linked to all three parts. The full DVD is for sale on their site
store.discovery.com/biblical-mysteries-explained-dvd/detail.php?p=98330
YesDumb question but is this the same discovery channel from tv?
How can we trust the video when this is the same channel that aired The Lost Tomb of Jesus, then a bunch of archaeologists said the Tomb didn’t belong to Jesus, after all?
?How can we trust the video when this is the same channel that aired The Lost Tomb of Jesus, then a bunch of archaeologists said the Tomb didn’t belong to Jesus, after all?
Of course, it’s produced by someone entirely different, with different information by different people.
Is that how?