Did Peter practice the Jewish passover?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tacdon
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The last supper is the final Passover, all four cups are consumed by Jesus, Jesus IS the Passover Lamb. I mean it doesn’t get much clearer then when they place the wine soaked sponge on a hyssop branch, Jesus drinks from it and then says it is finished and He gave up His spirit. The Hyssop branch is what God prescribed to Moses in Exodus 12:22 regarding the blood of the Passover Lamb. Catholics re-present the sacrifice on Calvary at every mass.
 
The bible says the Jews should practice the passover FOREVER. Their passover was to remember what God did for them in Egypt.
At the risk of sounding trite, the bible says that the rock in the dessert was Christ.* He is the passover forever. Remember that the bible says that heaven and earth will pass away.* How does one then celebrate the passover forever?

Christ.

“Take, eat, this is my Body, which is given for you.”

“Take and drink. This is the cup of my Blood, the Blood of the NEW TESTAMENT.” (Side note: this is the only reason that the New Testament is called the New Testament - Christ’s Blood poured out from the chalice of salvation).

Simple.
  • citations if needed.
 
I am also unclear if you some how believe that after Jesus Ascended into Heaven, Peter went back to the Temple the following year at Passover to partake in sacrificing lambs with the High Priests because that is how the ancients would have celebrated Passover until the Temple fell.
 
If Peter celebrated all the Jewish holy days, why doesn’t the Catholic church do the same as Peter did.

The Catholic church does not celebrate the passover like Jews do or Peter did.
We did not say that Peter celebrated all of the Jewish Holidays, but I will say that Peter celebrated the Passover. We are shown in the Bible (my last post) that the Last Supper was a passover meal. Jesus, Peter, and all of the disciples celebrated the passover meal. However, you’re right the last supper was not an ordinary passover meal, it was a NEW passover meal, in that Christ instituted the Holy Eucharist. After Christ’s passion and death on the cross this is what Peter and the disciples celebrated, the New passover of the Holy Eucharist.

In the old passover:
—The Jews commemorate the passover of the Lord over the enslaved Jews of Egypt and remember him saving them from the bondage and slavery of the egyptians.

In the new passover:
—At the Eucharist (the new passover) we commemorate the passover of our messiah, Jesus, who freed us from being enslaved to sin and the bondage of death,

In the old Passover:
—An umblemished lamb was sacrificed, this lambs blood was spilled…and this lambs blood was spread all over the doorways of houses of the Jews, to save them from death.

In the New Passover:
—Jesus, the Lamb of God was sacrificed, and this lambs blood was spilled, to save us from death. In the new passover of the Holy Eucharist…this same sacrifice, Christ’s sacrifice is made present for us till the end of time.

In the Old passover:
They used unleavened bread

In the new passover:
We use unleavened bread

In the old passover:
They literally had to ate the unblemished sacrificial lamb.

In the New Passover:
We literally have eat the unblemished sacrificial Lamb of God.
 
I’ve looked at the passover that is celebrated at mass and it doesn’t seem to be the same passover that Jews observe.
Have you gone to a Seder Night for the Passover, taken note of everything that goes on, then gone to Mass and compared Notes, if you have tell me what you have observed, as a Convert to the Catholic Church from the Orthodox Jewish Religion you tell me what you think is different- ? Since you say you are a Protestant how would your Service tie in with either or is it neither.

Look forward to your comments
 
If Peter celebrated all the Jewish holy days, why doesn’t the Catholic church do the same as Peter did.

The Catholic church does not celebrate the passover like Jews do or Peter did.
As you know the Last Supper was the celebration of Passover (Seder Meal). During the Seder Meal four cups of wine are shared around. This is pretty much set in stone. There was and still is always four cups of wine shared around at the Passover meal. If you didn’t, it would be like Mass without the Eucharist. Unthinkable.

So why did Jesus only share 3 cups of wine?

I like Scott Hahn’s explanation below, he argues that the Passover meal by which Jesus initiated the new Covenant in his own blood did not end in the upper room, but at calvary and Catholics celebrate his sacrifice with an eternal feast present in every Mass with the Eucharist.

'In Mark 14:22 we read, “And as they were eating he took bread and blessed and broke it and gave it to them and said, 'Take; this is my body. And he took a cup and when he had given thanks [the Greek word for that is eucharisto] he gave it to them and they all drank of it, and he said to them, ‘This is my blood of the new covenant which is poured out for many.’” And then he adds a kind of unusual statement: “Truly I say to you, I shall not drink again of the fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new in the kingdom of God.” And then, when they had sung a hymn, they went out into the night to the Mount of Olives.

Now that might not seem very significant to you but to scholars who study the gospel accounts of the Passover in the upper room, there’s a big problem. Why? Because we know the way the Passover has been celebrated for centuries, for millenia; it’s a very ancient liturgy, it’s well known, it’s no secret. Jews still celebrate it according to the same structure. There are four cups that represent the structure of the Passover. The first cup is the blessing of the festival day, it’s the kiddush cup. The second cup of wine occurs really at the beginning of the Passover liturgy itself, and that involves the singing of psalm 113. And then there’s the third cup, the cup of blessing which involves the actual meal, the unleavened bread and so on. And then, before the fourth cup, you sing the great hil-el psalms: 114, 115, 116, 117 and 118. And having sung those psalms you proceed to the fourth cup which for all practical purposes is the climax of the Passover.

Now what’s the problem? The problem is that gospel account says something like this: after the third cup is drunk Jesus says, “I shall not drink again of the fruit of the vine until I am entering into the kingdom of God.” And it says, “Then they sang the psalms.” Every Jew who knows the liturgy would expect: and then they went ahead and said the grace and the blessing and had the fourth cup which climaxed and consummated the Passover. But no, the gospel account say they sang the psalms and went out into the night.

I’m sure this doesn’t seem like a big problem and for a long time it didn’t seem big to me, but it has led many scholars to question whether he was celebrating a Passover at all because you just don’t blow apart the liturgy that way. You don’t just sidestep the most important part. It would be like saying the Mass and skipping the Eucharist, forgetting the words of consecration. So why did Jesus do it?

(CONT)
 
If Peter celebrated all the Jewish holy days, why doesn’t the Catholic church do the same as Peter did.

The Catholic church does not celebrate the passover like Jews do or Peter did.
(Continued)

Other scholars say, well back them there must not have been a fourth cup. But ancient revered traditions like that don’t just spring up overnight and then cover the globe like the Passover liturgy has, with all four cups.Why did he skip the fourth cup? After all, he was raised a Jew, he’d been celebrating the Passover every year of his life since he was a little boy according to the strictest laws of Moses. Well, maybe there’s a psychological reason. Maybe he was so anxious, so uptight about what he knew he was going to do, he - for instance, we read in Mark 14:32, “They went out to a place called Gethsemane and he said to his disciples, ‘Sit here while I pray.’ He took with him Peter, James and John and began to be greatly distressed and troubled, and he said to them, ‘My soul is very sorrowful even unto death.’”

Well, we just read, they went to Gethsemane. Three times he fell down to the ground and said to his Father, he cried out. “Abba, Father!” He fell to the ground and three times said to the Father, “Abba, Father.” The most intimate of terms. “All things are possible to Thee. Remove this cup from me. Yet not what I will, but what Thou wilt.” Remove this cup. Take away this cup. What is this cup? I think, is a connection between an interrupted liturgy that had been followed strictly up until the very end and this heartfelt, earnest plea and prayer of our Savior. Remove this cup. He also said, though, “I shall not taste of the fruit of the vine again until I enter into the kingdom.”

But then we turn to John, chapter 19 which describes in unique detail the sacrifice of our Lord. There’s no mistaking the fact that St. John, the beloved disciple, understood our Lord’s sacrifice as the culmination, the fulfillment of the Old Testament Passover. For instance, why is that Jesus happened to be wearing a seamless linen garment at the cross, when just coincidently that’s what the priest was legislated to wear when he sacrificed the Passover? Here is the true priest, as well as the true victim.

And when he was crucified, unlike the two thieves whose legs had to be broken to expedite death, his bones were not broken. Why? To fulfill the scripture where it says, “None of his bones shall be broken.” What’s that talking about where it says, “None of his bones shall be broken”? One of the things is that if you took a lamb to sacrifice for the Passover and you discovered that it had a broken bone, you had to throw him out and get another one. The only fit sacrifice was a lamb without broken bones. John sees in this so much more than we can get into, but one thing in particular. Verse 28, “After this"at the very end of his cruel sufferings"Jesus, knowing that all was now finished said, in order to fulfill the scriptures, ‘I thirst.’” Now, he’s been on the cross for hours. Is this the first moment of thirst. No, he’d been wracked with pain and dying of thirst for hours. But he says, in order to fulfill the scripture, “I thirst.” Why? To fulfill the scripture.

"A bowl of sour wine stood there. They put a sponge full of the sour wine on a hyssop branch_the same kind of branch the Israelites had to use. He refused it: “I will not taste of the fruit of the vine I am coming into the kingdom.” He skipped the fourth cup and then he went to pray, ‘Remove this cup, not as I will will, but as thou wilt,’ And now he has gone and fulfilled that will to the uttermost, in perfect suffering obedience to the Father, in an act of unspeakable love.

"They put a sponge full of the sour wine on hyssop and held it to his mouth. When Jesus had received the sour wine he said the words that are spoken of in the fourth cup consummation, “It is finished.” What is the it referring to? An exegete, a trained interpreter of the word is supposed to find the contextual meaning, not just import a meaning from a theology textbook. What is Jesus speaking of when he says, “It is finished?” I mean, our redemption is not completed once he - he’s not yet raised. Paul says, “He was raised for our justification.”

So what is the it talking about? He said, ‘It is finished’, and he bowed his head and gave up his spirit, his breath. The it, of course you realize by now, is the Passover sacrifice. Because who is Jesus Christ? He is the sacrifice of Egypt, the firstborn son. Remember, the Egyptians involuntarily had to offer up their firstborn sons as atonement for their own sins and wickedness. Christ dies for Egypt and the world. Plus, he is the Passover lamb, the unblemished lamb, without broken bones who offers himself up for the life of the world.

The sacrifice begins in the upper room with the institution of the Eucharist and it ends at calvary. Calvary begins with the Eucharist. The Eucharist ends at Calvary. But in another way of thinking, it ain’t over yet! Cause it ain’t over till it’s over.

Paul tells us in 1 Corinthians 5:7-8, “Christ our Passover lamb has been sacrificed, therefore”_what?_we don’t need to have any more sacrifice? Therefore we don’t need to have any more ritual, therefore all we have to do is have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and invite him into our hearts and everything else is taken care of? No, he’s too knowledgeable about the Old Testament to say any of that. He says, “Christ our Passover lamb has been sacrificed; let us therefore celebrate the feast.” What feast? The whole Passover feast. It’s not complete yet. What do you mean? And the next five chapters in many ways St. Paul describes how the Eucharist is to be celebrated, because it’s the culmination of the Passover sacrifice.

It means the feast must be celebrated forever and that is what occurs at every Mass in the Eucharist.
 
If Peter celebrated all the Jewish holy days, why doesn’t the Catholic church do the same as Peter did.

The Catholic church does not celebrate the passover like Jews do or Peter did.
The old passover was a foreshadowing of Christ’s sacrifice, which Catholics celebrate at every Mass. In fact, all the Old Testament feasts and rituals were shadows.

16 Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a sabbath. 17 These are only a shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ. (Col 2:16-17)

Peter may or may not have continued to celebrate Jewish feasts. But it wouldn’t have been out of obligation but out of custom. (the same way Jewish converts to Christianity today will still celebrate Hanukkah) That doesn’t mean all Christian’s are required to do the same, in fact, St. Paul explicitly says they aren’t. Because Christ has fulfilled the law.
 
Have you gone to a Seder Night for the Passover, taken note of everything that goes on, then gone to Mass and compared Notes, if you have tell me what you have observed, as a Convert to the Catholic Church from the Orthodox Jewish Religion you tell me what you think is different- ? Since you say you are a Protestant how would your Service tie in with either or is it neither.

Look forward to your comments
👍
 
At the risk of sounding trite, the bible says that the rock in the dessert was Christ.* He is the passover forever. Remember that the bible says that heaven and earth will pass away.* How does one then celebrate the passover forever?

Christ.

“Take, eat, this is my Body, which is given for you.”

“Take and drink. This is the cup of my Blood, the Blood of the NEW TESTAMENT.” (Side note: this is the only reason that the New Testament is called the New Testament - Christ’s Blood poured out from the chalice of salvation).

Simple.
  • citations if needed.
They could celebrate it in heaven.
 
They could celebrate it in heaven.
Why don’t you respond to Celtic Maiden’s excellent post 25
Have you gone to a Seder Night for the Passover, taken note of everything that goes on, then gone to Mass and compared Notes, if you have tell me what you have observed, as a Convert to the Catholic Church from the Orthodox Jewish Religion you tell me what you think is different- ? Since you say you are a Protestant how would your Service tie in with either or is it neither.
Look forward to your comments
 
Have you gone to a Seder Night for the Passover, taken note of everything that goes on, then gone to Mass and compared Notes, if you have tell me what you have observed, as a Convert to the Catholic Church from the Orthodox Jewish Religion you tell me what you think is different- ? Since you say you are a Protestant how would your Service tie in with either or is it neither.

Look forward to your comments
I can just look online to compare the differences between the two.
 
No it’s not. You are asking why the church does not celebrate Passover and yet you don’t. So why not?
The point is that there should of been a church with christian Jews and a church with gentile christians and they would have different practices.

The Jewish church would still follow the Jewish holidays, but the gentile church would not.

My church does not celebrate passover like the Jews do, because I am a gentile not a Jew.

There are churches that are messianic Jewish that do though.
 
The point is that there should of been a church with christian Jews and a church with gentile christians and they would have different practices.

The Jewish church would still follow the Jewish holidays, but the gentile church would not.

My church does not celebrate passover like the Jews do, because I am a gentile not a Jew.

There are churches that are messianic Jewish that do though.
Where do you get that in the Bible? 2 churches? How is that one body?

The messianic Jews are not historical. They are a new group that retains Jewish cultural practices, but it does not have theological or salvific reason, just cultural reasons.

Christianity is the fulfillment of Judaism, just as practices changed when God made the first covenant with Abraham and again with the law of Moses, so too did it change with Jesus. It changed to the Catholic Church.
 
Where do you get that in the Bible? 2 churches? How is that one body?

The messianic Jews are not historical. They are a new group that retains Jewish cultural practices, but it does not have theological or salvific reason, just cultural reasons.

Christianity is the fulfillment of Judaism, just as practices changed when God made the first covenant with Abraham and again with the law of Moses, so too did it change with Jesus. It changed to the Catholic Church.
I heard that the Catholics allow hebrews to still celebrate all the Jewish holidays and feasts of the Jews.

Aren’t they still apart of the Catholic church even though they have some different practices.
 
They could celebrate it in heaven.
In any case, Jesus is the Jewish Messiah, and to follow Him is to practice a Jewish faith in which Gentiles have been grafted onto the Hebrew vine. The Jewish people will be more easily grafted back onto the vine than we Gentiles were. Romans 11.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top