L
Lily_Bernans
Guest
Yes, we are. Here you go:Good question. Are we to believe that the dead will literally physically rise up and literally resume their physical lives on Earth?
catholic.com/tracts/resurrection-of-the-body
Yes, we are. Here you go:Good question. Are we to believe that the dead will literally physically rise up and literally resume their physical lives on Earth?
The thing I wonder is where everyone is going to fit on this planet if all those billions living in end times and all those who had died and will be raised from the dead will all be here at the same time.Good question. Are we to believe that the dead will literally physically rise up and literally resume their physical lives on Earth?
What about people who were cremated?
Some elements of the faith seem to be expressed in words that on the surface are plain, but in fact are not meaningful within the limits of our understanding.What about people who were cremated?
If I’m up in Heaven, I’m not sure I’d want to come back in a physical sense.
Our resurrected bodies (except for those who die very shortly before the resurrection, are not the same set of molecules as our earthly bodies. If your body has been cremated, or if it has decayed so that all the molecules are long gone, God does not have to gather those same molecules together. He simply gives each of us substantially the same body we had in life, and yet this body is renewed and glorified. It is no longer subject to harm or suffering or corruption.What about people who were cremated?
If I’m up in Heaven, I’m not sure I’d want to come back in a physical sense.
Not too many when you consider the size of the universe.The thing I wonder is where everyone is going to fit on this planet if all those billions living in end times and all those who had died and will be raised from the dead will all be here at the same time.
But all these people are going to be in one place…the earth, Ive wondered about this too, if every single person that has ever lived, is suddenly back on the planet, in some type of glorified body, that is alot of people, and Im assuming they will return to the areas where they lived or died.Not too many when you consider the size of the universe.
When you’ve got eternity, a lot is possible.
Like a 2 year-old trying to imagine the world of adults, I can’t really say what it will be like.
Why do you think the people in hell will be back on earth? We don’t know if anyone is in hell, or will go to hell, but once in hell, it is for eternity.But all these people are going to be in one place…the earth, Ive wondered about this too, if every single person that has ever lived, is suddenly back on the planet, in some type of glorified body, that is alot of people, and Im assuming they will return to the areas where they lived or died.
Plus, the people in hell will also be back on the earth, makes me wonder how that will work out?
Yes, that seems consistent with the following understanding of what would have been the case without sin:… So it seems the Fall didn’t introduce anything – only in the sense of allowing mankind to be affected by the natural, limited world around them.
I don’t perceive a need to view the body as changed by the Fall. But there is also no point in seeking to analyse, by scientific method, the manner in which the soul exercised influence over the body (biology). If it makes sense to ask about “how our biology was changed”, it makes sense to ask scientific questions about our pre-fall condition. I think those questions are all beyond science.Animals have a biological framework that allows for mutations, imperfections, susceptibility to sickness, etc. Why should we think that the Fall changed our biology?
Yes we do know.Do we know if animals at the time of Adam and Eve died or not(before the fall)? I know its said animals were much different too, the lion lay with the lamb, suggesting there was no killing or violence.
As noted in another thread, I think you and I are close on all of this. But it bothers me a lot when I hear some people talk about this issue. Many posts seem really… unscientific. I don’t mean to offend. And it’s okay if some people hold certain views about the Fall that are different from mine. What scares me is more about how people in the church (magisterium and theologians in particular) explain all of this.I don’t perceive a need to view the body as changed by the Fall. But there is also no point in seeking to analyse, by scientific method, the manner in which the soul exercised influence over the body (biology). If it makes sense to ask about “how our biology was changed”, it makes sense to ask scientific questions about our pre-fall condition. I think those questions are all beyond science.
I find the topic quite “academic” or “theologically technical”. Is there ANY conclusions or implications for life, the faith or reaching heaven that one can draw pursuant to this discussion - or is it just a matter of curiosity?As noted in another thread, I think you and I are close on all of this. But it bothers me a lot when I hear some people talk about this issue. Many posts seem really… unscientific. I don’t mean to offend. And it’s okay if some people hold certain views about the Fall that are different from mine. What scares me is more about how people in the church (magisterium and theologians in particular) explain all of this.
I’m fine with the view that God gave our first parents gifts (impassibility, integrity, etc) to uplift humanity in a state that is more harmonious with the gift of grace they had been placed in with God. I’m fine with the idea that this means the finite, limited world would not have hurt Adam - because he had special gifts. I am not fine with the idea that the sin of Adam had some sort of reverberating effect of knocking the entire Universe out of whack, which includes (as some on here have said), diseases, animal death and suffering, and various other physical evils.
It seems with what we know from science that the Fall did not bring about all these physical evils. Disease is an effect of various living organisms that have evolved naturally, for example. I don’t even think we can say that bodily deformities and handicaps came from the Fall; they are a result of how genetics work.
For me, I feel like this issue is akin to the “God of the Gaps” arguments, but in a different way. The God of the Gaps argument finds a gap of understanding in science and says “God must have done it!” when really, all we need is a little more information to understand the gap. In this case, it’s more of a “Original Sin of the Gaps,” whereby any evil must be traced back to the Fall – and that just seems unscientific and so ultimately makes a shakey theological statement. Which is not a good thing, since the Fall is a foundational teaching of Christianity.I find the topic quite “academic” or “theologically technical”. Is there ANY conclusions or implications for life, the faith or reaching heaven that one can draw pursuant to this discussion - or is it just a matter of curiosity?
…/QUOTE]
The gift of bodily immortality, the gift of integrity (equivalent to exemption from concupiscence), and the gift of infused knowledge, were given to Adam and Eve. That was lost along with the state of sanctifying grace.
I am not familiar with persons who seek to fill every scientific gap with “God must have done it”.For me, I feel like this issue is akin to the “God of the Gaps” arguments, but in a different way. The God of the Gaps argument finds a gap of understanding in science and says “God must have done it!” when really, all we need is a little more information to understand the gap. In this case, it’s more of a “Original Sin of the Gaps,” whereby any evil must be traced back to the Fall – and that just seems unscientific and so ultimately makes a shakey theological statement. Which is not a good thing, since the Fall is a foundational teaching of Christianity.
And all of that relates to my thread on homosexuality and the Fall.
My opinion is that the fall of some of the angels, very early after the creation of the universe, caused the universe to be in a fallen state. Angels have the role of overseeing God’s creation, and so it was fitting, when many angels fell and became devils, for God to permit a corresponding effect in Creation, that it be subject to decay and that the animals (when they later evolved) would be subject to injury and death.I’m fine with the view that God gave our first parents gifts (impassibility, integrity, etc) to uplift humanity in a state that is more harmonious with the gift of grace they had been placed in with God. I’m fine with the idea that this means the finite, limited world would not have hurt Adam - because he had special gifts. I am not fine with the idea that the sin of Adam had some sort of reverberating effect of knocking the entire Universe out of whack, which includes (as some on here have said), diseases, animal death and suffering, and various other physical evils.
It seems with what we know from science that the Fall did not bring about all these physical evils. Disease is an effect of various living organisms that have evolved naturally, for example. I don’t even think we can say that bodily deformities and handicaps came from the Fall; they are a result of how genetics work.