No, you missd the point entirely (nor did I ever say the issue was authority).
Give the equation whatever answer you want. I gave it five because thats what it looks like from my position, you gave it four because thats what you think it equates to. Either way it has absolutely nothing to do with history.
Similarly the Immaculate Conception does not reflect on Christ and therefore doesn’t matter, no matter what the answer is. That is why I don’t care what others believe, but do take issue with people forcing the answer on others.
If you don’t believe I am saying I’m more intelligent than Christ, why did you write that?
If Christ had said it, and we are speaking in theoreticals, I would accept that it was true. I would accept it as doctrine. I just wouldn’t accept it as dogma - unless he actually said that one must believe it to have salvation.
Yes, the question of the Immaculate Conception is a small problem compared to the debate between Theotokos/Christotokos - but that debate is not dealing with a small problem at all, it is, at its core about accepting that Jesus was always God.
I’m glad to hear you prefer “Theotokos”, as I said, that is dogma of the Catholic Church - you wouldn’t be a very good Catholic if you rejected the term.
I should have had a dash in there. Win/win is a common idiom to denote that both sides get what they want. It was sarcasm, pure and simply.