I don’t see how saying that Photius was disputatious, to use another word, is anything other than repeating an accepted historical reality. He was notoriously so, as has been stated by many scholars, including Orthodox ones. My problem with the quotation I gave is not that he stood up for the truth, but that he was insulting while doing so, which is a point that the responses to my post have failed to understand. I was making fun of the impression I was getting that to dare criticize anything a saint said or did was to deny his sainthood and judge his holiness, which is obviously ridiculous. My original point, which I’d like to return to, is that both east and west share blame for the schism, a point that no one seems to have disagreed with. I also assure you that I have no particular problems with Photius other than his tendency toward uncharitable argumentation which I’ve already addressed.