Diocesan priest to FSSP

  • Thread starter Thread starter Damase
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Damase

Guest
I know that it’s possible for a priest with the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter to request incardination in a diocese as a diocesan priest, but does anyone know if the converse is possible? That is, is it possible for a diocesan priest to join the F.S.S.P.?

Thanks for your answers.
 
I know that it’s possible for a priest with the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter to request incardination in a diocese as a diocesan priest, but does anyone know if the converse is possible? That is, is it possible for a diocesan priest to join the F.S.S.P.?

Thanks for your answers.
I don’t see why that would not be possible; but the priest would have to be released by his bishop and accepted by the FSSP.

Not exactly the same thing, but at our local Trappist abbey, there is a Trappist who started out as a Jesuit. Absolutely awesome homilies when he is the main celebrant.
 
There are several FSSP priests who were previously diocesan priests, so it is possible. The FSSP itself says that it will review on a case-by-case basis. However, the FSSP also states its categorical preference as training its own priests, so a diocesan priest joining the FSSP is the exception, not the norm. As stated, it will also depend on the bishop’s willingness to recommend and release him.
 
Any secular priest may join a religious order/community but he would have to go through all the formation as any new member of that group.

So there is the possibility of having a priest who is a novice in the novitiate.
 
Is the FSSP actually religious priests? I didn’t think they were religious.
 
No, the FSSP is not a religious order; they are a society of apostolic life. And the FSP would not send a recently received priest back to the seminary, which is where the formation primarily occurs.
 
No, the FSSP is not a religious order; they are a society of apostolic life. And the FSP would not send a recently received priest back to the seminary, which is where the formation primarily occurs.
Just as with a religious order. Religious orders and communities can do formation of their own outside of the seminary which is why many use theologates rather than seminaries for their students.

If a priest were to join the Carmelties, he would spend some time in the pre-novitiate, go on to the canonical novitiate, and then they would work out some place for him to life within one of our ministries while completeing the foramtion requirements and the time spent in temporary vows.

As our constitutions state that all in temporary vows must live in our main student house for two years before making final vows he would most likely take the Carmelite certification classes at WTU during that period.
 
Yes, but as there are no houses of FSSP brothers, and there are no formation communities, to speak of, outside of seminary settings–just one or two priests living by themselves anywhere there is an FSSP parish or chapel, there is little opportunity for formation, certainly not in the way that the FSSP prefers.That is why they prefer to limit their receptions of priests from other formations to a handful.
 
Yes, but as there are no houses of FSSP brothers, and there are no formation communities, to speak of, outside of seminary settings–just one or two priests living by themselves anywhere there is an FSSP parish or chapel, there is little opportunity for formation, certainly not in the way that the FSSP prefers.That is why they prefer to limit their receptions of priests from other formations to a handful.
As the FSSP are a community of secular priests there would be no further formation required other than the formation about the community. They would need to make a unique formation program for each individual comming in.

It is important to note that once one goes through a canonical novitiate (for those religisous that must) there is no requirement that they go through another.

So say we have a Dominican who wants to change to the Carmelites. The formation committee along with the provincial counsel and the prior provincial may waive the novitiate for this man as he already did a canoncial novitiate but they could require him to do the Carmelite novitiate if they wished. But a secular priest coming in would have to do the novitiate.

It is not all that common. I would say secular priests wanting to join orders/communities is the most “common”, next most “common” would be religious wanting to go to a stricter order. I konw of a couple of Carmelites who went to the Trappists (one has returned) and one who went to a group of Hermits (but he has also returned).

There is a period of 3 years of probation at the end of which either the individual or the superior can say no and the man must return to where he was.
 
There are several FSSP priests who were previously diocesan priests, so it is possible. The FSSP itself says that it will review on a case-by-case basis. However, the FSSP also states its categorical preference as training its own priests, so a diocesan priest joining the FSSP is the exception, not the norm. As stated, it will also depend on the bishop’s willingness to recommend and release him.
One of the priests from my diocese spent two years with the FSSP’s parish in Scranton, Pennsylvania, but he is now back in his home diocese. He is very traditional, anyway-but I’m sure he would have been more ‘at home’ with like-minded priests and laity like the FSSPs and the congregations they served than with among the more liberal priests and laity of his original diocese. I think he was probably asked to return by the Bishop, since we are getting short priest numbers-wise.

When the FSSPs used to come up here twice a month to say the EF Mass, I remember that one of them had been a diocesan priest; which one he was from, I don’t know. But he was very nice, as were all of them who came. We miss them very much! Wish they could come back!
 
I konw of a couple of Carmelites who went to the Trappists (one has returned) and one who went to a group of Hermits (but he has also returned).
Hmm.

I am probably wandering a bit off topic, but I was under the recent impression that the Carmalites might be more strict than the Trappists. Although I am not sure of the exact ties to the Carmalites (they don’t use the abbreviation, apparently) there is a group who call themselves Carmalites forming in Wyoming, and their description of their life seems at least as, if not more strict than the Trappists I am familiar with.
 
One of the priests from my diocese spent two years with the FSSP’s parish in Scranton, Pennsylvania, but he is now back in his home diocese. He is very traditional, anyway-but I’m sure he would have been more ‘at home’ with like-minded priests and laity like the FSSPs and the congregations they served than with among the more liberal priests and laity of his original diocese. I think he was probably asked to return by the Bishop, since we are getting short priest numbers-wise.

When the FSSPs used to come up here twice a month to say the EF Mass, I remember that one of them had been a diocesan priest; which one he was from, I don’t know. But he was very nice, as were all of them who came. We miss them very much! Wish they could come back!
There is a very good and traditional diocesan priest in our diocese. He has been supportive of the FSSP here and in fact the FSSP used to go to another part of the diocese once a week for Sunday Mass but has since stopped in favor of that priest who know is a parish pastor in the same area. The diocesan priest now celebrates the EF on Sundays on top of the two OF Masses he celebrates

Didn’t the diocesan priest you speak of do the same thing when he returned to the diocese?
 
Hmm.

I am probably wandering a bit off topic, but I was under the recent impression that the Carmalites might be more strict than the Trappists. Although I am not sure of the exact ties to the Carmalites (they don’t use the abbreviation, apparently) there is a group who call themselves Carmalites forming in Wyoming, and their description of their life seems at least as, if not more strict than the Trappists I am familiar with.
We have Carmelite Hermits that are more strict than the average Carmelite.

The group in Wyoming have no afflilation with either the Order of Carmel or the Discalced Carmelites. They are a public association of the faithful under the local bishop.
 
We have Carmelite Hermits that are more strict than the average Carmelite.

The group in Wyoming have no afflilation with either the Order of Carmel or the Discalced Carmelites. They are a public association of the faithful under the local bishop.
Hmm. They seem to consider themselves to be following the Carmelite charism. Anyway, their coffee is good.
 
Hmm. They seem to consider themselves to be following the Carmelite charism. Anyway, their coffee is good.
Anyone can follow a Charism without being a part of the actual Order.

They are not a religious order, they are a religious community, they are under the local bishop, they are not of pontifical right as the O.Carm. and O.C.D. are. That being said they are a bit more monastic than the Carmelite Tradition is.

There is a group of Hermits in Lake Elmo, MN, who are affiliated with the O.Carm., they seem to follow the Hermit idea of the Rule of St Albert by meeting for Mass and Meals as the Rule spells out.

Hermits of the Blessed Virgin Mary
 
Anyone can follow a Charism without being a part of the actual Order.

They are not a religious order, they are a religious community, they are under the local bishop, they are not of pontifical right as the O.Carm. and O.C.D. are. That being said they are a bit more monastic than the Carmelite Tradition is.

There is a group of Hermits in Lake Elmo, MN, who are affiliated with the O.Carm., they seem to follow the Hermit idea of the Rule of St Albert by meeting for Mass and Meals as the Rule spells out.

Hermits of the Blessed Virgin Mary
Thanks. There is always more to learn about the Church!
 
As the FSSP are a community of secular priests there would be no further formation required other than the formation about the community. They would need to make a unique formation program for each individual comming in.
There would indeed be further formation, as the nature of the traditional rituals, spirituality, practice and approach of the FSSP and ICRSS are significantly different from what is found in other communities. That is why the FSSP prefers to form their own from the outset. Not sure why you wish to argue this, as that is their practice and stated reasoning.
 
There is a very good and traditional diocesan priest in our diocese. He has been supportive of the FSSP here and in fact the FSSP used to go to another part of the diocese once a week for Sunday Mass but has since stopped in favor of that priest who know is a parish pastor in the same area. The diocesan priest now celebrates the EF on Sundays on top of the two OF Masses he celebrates

Didn’t the diocesan priest you speak of do the same thing when he returned to the diocese?
Yes, in fact he did even before he went to Pennsylvania. Once or twice a month, after his Sunday Masses at his previous parish, he would come and say the EF Mass for a small group that met in a former convent chapel.

I have only seen him once since he came back this summer, though not to talk to. I wouldn’t be surprised if he has tried to persuade the woman who organizes the EF Mass to come and have it at his new parish-it’s a little bigger than the convent chapel. But some members of the congregation come from great distances, and I don’t know if they would want to do that when the winter weather hits.
 
There would indeed be further formation, as the nature of the traditional rituals, spirituality, practice and approach of the FSSP and ICRSS are significantly different from what is found in other communities. That is why the FSSP prefers to form their own from the outset. Not sure why you wish to argue this, as that is their practice and stated reasoning.
Spirituality, practice and approach are covered under my statement of “the formation about the community”.

Traditional rituals are not part of formation, that would fall under education.

I may no argument though you seem to have read one. I apologize for that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top