Let me try to clarify what I was thinking. I agree with the two previous posts. My thought was that the mystical writings of John and Teresa are not the way of life or the rule of Carmel. They are the goal of Carmel or the product when the life of Carmel is lived in such a heroic manner. They protray the goal of the Carmelite by showing, in a veyr concrete way, the fruit of the Rule of Carmel or one may say that goal of the rule of Carmel.
Just a the writings of Francis, Bonaventure and Francis of Osuna are not the rule of the Franciscan life, but they are the end result of Franciscan life lived in a heroic manner, and they reflect the goal of the Franciscan.
I’m not sure if I’m saying it correctly. I know what I’m thinking, but putting it in writing is more difficullt. Nonetheless, I do see the connection between the mystical writings and the Rule of Carmel. I guess that’s the best way that I can explain it.
Having studied both, it is very clear that there is an intimate connection. However,one remains the rule and the other is the “climax” (for lack of a better word) of living the rule.
Does that help clarify what I’m trying to say? I hope it does. If not, please ask me again. I’ll try again. But I do agree with Sister and Augustine. The Rule, Teresa and John of the Cross are inseparable.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF