H
HOPEFUL_IN_UK
Guest
Abbot, could you post links to some of these other threads? Is it really impossible to believe that Mitch is telling the truth?
true.I wouldn’t dismiss it that way at all. I think there’s a spectrum of issues and opinions within the SSPX.
I think that as we see the obstacles removed by the Pope, the people within SSPX will have to make a decision. Some will come back, and some will not. I think a lot of people have been brainwashed into thinking that anything the local bishop allows must be suspect.
It’s going to be interesting, that’s for sure.
Yes, i’m not sure whether illicit practices make a Mass invalid, however it looks like either way it is going to be invalid, maybe someone else here can answer your question.Hi…I know illicit practices don’t invalidate a Mass. However, if there are illicit practices built into the Mass, would the Mass be illicit (valid, but illicit)? If one can expect illicit practices, would one be excused? I am a little confused about “somewhat blasphemous” - how can one ever be a party to that? Granted, no-one is forcing one to blaspheme onsself, but to be regularly exposed to it…and also, surely one is justifying it by ones presence?
Regarding a different parish - what I described is standard everywhere. Wherever one goes, this is what one finds. I do not have the option of the “reverent NO” let along an authorised TLM.
Thanks for your comments!
Mitch
Perhaps do you have any other valid forms of Mass in your area besides the NO, perhaps the Byzantine Rite, maybe a Benedictine Rite?rpp,
I am sorry you think I lack humility - perhaps that is how I come across. I specifically approached the List for advice and guidance, specifically because I am confused - 10 years of the SSPX, married to a wife who grew up (since age 7 or 8) SSPX - and I get contradictory advice, even from official, “in good standing” priests in my diocese.
rpp, I am not being rude or condescending, but I do think some people are fortunate in that they have excellent priests and bishops, but my own experience, and that of many, is not so peachy at all. We turned in desperation to the SSPX and individual priests who were offering the TLM, teaching the traditional catechism, promoted the Rosary, etc, and, to tell the truth, were much more obedient to and respectful of the Pope than any of the local priests. The SSPX arguments about true and false obedience, the state of necessity, canon law’s primary end being the salvation of souls, the legitimacy of the TLM and its suppression by the hierarchy, all made perfect sense to us…then. Now I see the negative traits and pitfalls of their arguments, and am looking for an alternative - I am doing precisely what DIOCESAN priests have said I may: attend the SSPX when they have Mass, attend a NO Mass on the other Sundays. However, I am still trying to make sense of the different arguments.
If I came across as arrogant, I apologise. I am only looking for sensible guidance.
God bless
Mitch
Perhaps you should start a petition to show people the necessity of behaving during Mass. Perhaps when people see your pious behavior they will change.Hello Hopeful in the UK!
I am trying to discern God’s will slowly and carefully and think that my present situation is tolerable for the short to medium term.
Basically, I have “parish hopped” when I attend the NO - my local parish isn’t great and I’ve only been there once, and don’t feel able to go again. I attend normally either a fairly pretty, albeit modern, church in another parish, said by an old priest who is a late vocation, on Saturday evening when the hymns are quite traditional - it is fairly by the book, I must admit, though the altar girls (only girls) to tell you the truth give me the creeps (I’m sure they are good, decent girls, but I cannot stand the concept) and the EHMC’s are totally unnecessary if people could make do with communion under one kind, and prepared for an extra 10 minutes, tops, at Mass.
Sounds ok I guess.I also sometimes attend Mass at the chapel of the Poor Sisters of Nazareth (now that the diocese has taken their convent building and lovely chapel over, they have to make do with an improvised little chapel in a former dining room) - very early Sunday morning. There are no servers, male or female, the retired bishop who says Mass doesn’t wear full vestments, just a baggy beige alb and stole and pectoral cross, no sign of peace, communion under one kind, but with an (unnecessary) EHMC - one of the nuns - assisting, no music but always St Francis’s “Make Me a Channel of your Peace” at the end; fairly tolerable, but very minimalist - the shortest options always (Eucharistic Prayer II, abbreviated readings, Penitential Rite II I think).
No it’s not however I see it as more religious to take it by the tongue, however I don’t see anything blasphemous about taking it by the hands, as long as one takes it properly.Communion in the hand upsets me a lot - should it? I know it is permissible, and I don’t agree with the SSPX who say it is a sacrilege - at least not objectively, I just wish they’d stop it!
I think that the NO is fine, yet sadly no one celebrates it with respect. Hopefully this will change.You are so right about being “catechised” on the evils of the NO. There is the usual list of abuses and pet peeves, not to mention ecumenical events (get any Trad started on Assisi prayer meeting) which we all know so well. Sad thing is there is some merit, I think, in some of the complaints. Surely one is permitted to not be enthusiastic about every change since 1965! Or that abuses and excesses happen and are tolerated too much. Even some cardinals, apparently, were less than happy about the Assisi Prayer Meeting!
Rejoice, I trust Pope Benedict XVI you should as well, he will fix the errors of the past.Now that Pope Benedict has said the TLM was never abolished, how are we supposed to react
Whats a indult Tridentine Mass?Re: Can I go to an illicit Mass in order to experience a Tridentine Latin Mass?
No, you should not attend an SSPX chapel because you want to witness a Tridentine Latin Mass. As stated in a previous Q&A, the only reason that I can foresee that would justify going to an SSPX chapel would be to attend a funeral for an SSPX follower. Lesser reasons do not appear to suffice. I recommend calling your diocese to find out if an indult Tridentine Latin Mass is available in your diocese. If it is not, then you will have to wait to experience such a Mass until one is being licitly offered in your area or in an area in which you are visiting.
“If anyone comes to me, I want to lead them to Him.” --St. Edith Stein
Last edited by Michelle Arnold : Dec 16, '05 at 4:46 pm.
Then you saidmarried to a wife who grew up (since age 7 or 8) SSPX
You were involved with SSPX all along. Your wife has never been separated from it. I do not believe you turned to them in “desperation”. I think you never actually left. Your wife certainly has not. I believe the “desperation” you feel is the paranoia that the SSPX promote.We turned in desperation to the SSPX
I am going to mention that this letter was sent to a specific person in a specific circumstance and Msgr. Perl made the extra effort to make all know that. We do know that a person is not necessarily sinning by attending a chapel.What, then, of Mgr Perl of the PCED, who said, one can strictly speaking, fulfil ones Sunday obligation by attending an SSPX Mass, even though they don’t recommend it? They even said that it is appropriate to contribute modestly to the collection? Are we to ignore that?
Mitch
It isn’t quite the same; Anglicans lack a valid priesthood, and many teach heresy.Good, post. I don’t know whether he is a lier or not, however you made some great (harsh) but great statements about the SSPX. Regardless of whether they are correct or not about the TLM doesn’t matter because they are suspended schismatic priests. A good Catholic should not attend their services. Is not just the same as attending an Anglican service?
I was a bit harsh wasn’t I.Good, post. I don’t know whether he is a lier or not, however you made some great (harsh) but great statements about the SSPX. Regardless of whether they are correct or not about the TLM doesn’t matter because they are suspended schismatic priests. A good Catholic should not attend their services. Is not just the same as attending an Anglican service?
Oh, yes I know that however they seem to be moving in that direction.It isn’t quite the same; Anglicans lack a valid priesthood, and many teach heresy.
The SSPX are not (yet) as a group Heretics (tho’ some may be), and have valid priesthood.
It’s not a problem with me because I understand why this is a tense issue. The SSPX feel like the Church has alienated them, we fell like they are a schismatic group. I think that we both agree that we would like more TLM services, however the SSPX are wanting this so badly that they are willing to go to invalid services. I think really we all should learn from this. If any priests manage to see this thread and read it, I suggest they send it to any other clergy they know. I think that education is the root of the issue, and I pray that a conclusion will somehow come to this issue. I however follow the Bishop of Rome, and am going to start attending a valid TLM service, that I found in my area. I understand that I am lucky because many people do not have the luxury of attending a valid TLM service. I will pray this will change. However I want to make one more point. For everyone who hates the NO, don’t you think that it has served it’s purpose if it manages to bring more people into the Church, and Salvation? I think that it is better if it can do that. That being said, I am no NO fan, however that’s just my opinion.I was a bit harsh wasn’t it.Sorry about that.
Ouch.Yes, you are an embarassment to orthodox Catholicism.
Your Abbott
Why don’t you inform us of all his names so we’re aware.Every week or so, SSPX people here create a new person who have the same pathetic experiences. It’s all very boring, and anyone can see through it. How many other identities have you had here?
Your Abbott
I did not read everyone else’s responses, because I just want to respond to you with my experiences.There are several Catholic churches in my city, but no TLM’s, except for the local SSPX chapel, which has Mass twice per month. I fell in love with the TLM,…
Mitch
Yes, this is when the priest faces the same way as the people.Ad orientem?, you mean with their backs to the faithful?
OUCH, nice lol.Ouch.![]()
Seeing how you have nothing to say aside from a copycat retort, all I have to say is keep up the example of Vatican II’s love all, accept all mentality; you’re doing great.
![]()