Discerning SSPX affiliation

  • Thread starter Thread starter mitch2007
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Abbot, could you post links to some of these other threads? Is it really impossible to believe that Mitch is telling the truth?
 
I wouldn’t dismiss it that way at all. I think there’s a spectrum of issues and opinions within the SSPX.

I think that as we see the obstacles removed by the Pope, the people within SSPX will have to make a decision. Some will come back, and some will not. I think a lot of people have been brainwashed into thinking that anything the local bishop allows must be suspect.

It’s going to be interesting, that’s for sure.
true.
 
Hi…I know illicit practices don’t invalidate a Mass. However, if there are illicit practices built into the Mass, would the Mass be illicit (valid, but illicit)? If one can expect illicit practices, would one be excused? I am a little confused about “somewhat blasphemous” - how can one ever be a party to that? Granted, no-one is forcing one to blaspheme onsself, but to be regularly exposed to it…and also, surely one is justifying it by ones presence?

Regarding a different parish - what I described is standard everywhere. Wherever one goes, this is what one finds. I do not have the option of the “reverent NO” let along an authorised TLM.

Thanks for your comments!
Mitch
Yes, i’m not sure whether illicit practices make a Mass invalid, however it looks like either way it is going to be invalid, maybe someone else here can answer your question.
 
rpp,

I am sorry you think I lack humility - perhaps that is how I come across. I specifically approached the List for advice and guidance, specifically because I am confused - 10 years of the SSPX, married to a wife who grew up (since age 7 or 8) SSPX - and I get contradictory advice, even from official, “in good standing” priests in my diocese.

rpp, I am not being rude or condescending, but I do think some people are fortunate in that they have excellent priests and bishops, but my own experience, and that of many, is not so peachy at all. We turned in desperation to the SSPX and individual priests who were offering the TLM, teaching the traditional catechism, promoted the Rosary, etc, and, to tell the truth, were much more obedient to and respectful of the Pope than any of the local priests. The SSPX arguments about true and false obedience, the state of necessity, canon law’s primary end being the salvation of souls, the legitimacy of the TLM and its suppression by the hierarchy, all made perfect sense to us…then. Now I see the negative traits and pitfalls of their arguments, and am looking for an alternative - I am doing precisely what DIOCESAN priests have said I may: attend the SSPX when they have Mass, attend a NO Mass on the other Sundays. However, I am still trying to make sense of the different arguments.

If I came across as arrogant, I apologise. I am only looking for sensible guidance.

God bless
Mitch
Perhaps do you have any other valid forms of Mass in your area besides the NO, perhaps the Byzantine Rite, maybe a Benedictine Rite?
 
Hello Hopeful in the UK!

I am trying to discern God’s will slowly and carefully and think that my present situation is tolerable for the short to medium term.

Basically, I have “parish hopped” when I attend the NO - my local parish isn’t great and I’ve only been there once, and don’t feel able to go again. I attend normally either a fairly pretty, albeit modern, church in another parish, said by an old priest who is a late vocation, on Saturday evening when the hymns are quite traditional - it is fairly by the book, I must admit, though the altar girls (only girls) to tell you the truth give me the creeps (I’m sure they are good, decent girls, but I cannot stand the concept) and the EHMC’s are totally unnecessary if people could make do with communion under one kind, and prepared for an extra 10 minutes, tops, at Mass.
Perhaps you should start a petition to show people the necessity of behaving during Mass. Perhaps when people see your pious behavior they will change.
I also sometimes attend Mass at the chapel of the Poor Sisters of Nazareth (now that the diocese has taken their convent building and lovely chapel over, they have to make do with an improvised little chapel in a former dining room) - very early Sunday morning. There are no servers, male or female, the retired bishop who says Mass doesn’t wear full vestments, just a baggy beige alb and stole and pectoral cross, no sign of peace, communion under one kind, but with an (unnecessary) EHMC - one of the nuns - assisting, no music but always St Francis’s “Make Me a Channel of your Peace” at the end; fairly tolerable, but very minimalist - the shortest options always (Eucharistic Prayer II, abbreviated readings, Penitential Rite II I think).
Sounds ok I guess.
Communion in the hand upsets me a lot - should it? I know it is permissible, and I don’t agree with the SSPX who say it is a sacrilege - at least not objectively, I just wish they’d stop it!
No it’s not however I see it as more religious to take it by the tongue, however I don’t see anything blasphemous about taking it by the hands, as long as one takes it properly.
You are so right about being “catechised” on the evils of the NO. There is the usual list of abuses and pet peeves, not to mention ecumenical events (get any Trad started on Assisi prayer meeting) which we all know so well. Sad thing is there is some merit, I think, in some of the complaints. Surely one is permitted to not be enthusiastic about every change since 1965! Or that abuses and excesses happen and are tolerated too much. Even some cardinals, apparently, were less than happy about the Assisi Prayer Meeting!
I think that the NO is fine, yet sadly no one celebrates it with respect. Hopefully this will change.
 
Re: Can I go to an illicit Mass in order to experience a Tridentine Latin Mass?

No, you should not attend an SSPX chapel because you want to witness a Tridentine Latin Mass. As stated in a previous Q&A, the only reason that I can foresee that would justify going to an SSPX chapel would be to attend a funeral for an SSPX follower. Lesser reasons do not appear to suffice. I recommend calling your diocese to find out if an indult Tridentine Latin Mass is available in your diocese. If it is not, then you will have to wait to experience such a Mass until one is being licitly offered in your area or in an area in which you are visiting.

“If anyone comes to me, I want to lead them to Him.” --St. Edith Stein

Last edited by Michelle Arnold : Dec 16, '05 at 4:46 pm.
Whats a indult Tridentine Mass?
 
First you said:
married to a wife who grew up (since age 7 or 8) SSPX
Then you said
We turned in desperation to the SSPX
You were involved with SSPX all along. Your wife has never been separated from it. I do not believe you turned to them in “desperation”. I think you never actually left. Your wife certainly has not. I believe the “desperation” you feel is the paranoia that the SSPX promote.

Many aspects of the SSPX are cult like. They really do say, “We are the only ones who have it right. We are the only true Catholics.” To buy into this is to surrender your intellect. Do you really want to be in a cult? Even if that cult wears vestments, follows a liturgical calendar and hangs a picture of the Pope in the foyer of a chapel?

And the “abuses” you keep referring to, I think the problem here is your own attitude. That you are somehow more holy than a parish priest. THAT is not being humble. That is being arrogant.

Look at what it is doing to you. These delusional posts and outrageous rhetoric. You are calling priests who HAVE BEEN SUSPENDED as being obedient. If they really were obedient, they would not be saying Mass or hearing confessions.

You are on the verge of separating yourself from Holy Mother Church. You are doing EXACTLY what the good Cardinal warned people about. Extended influence to the SSPX in their current state can lead a lay person to become schismatic. We can all see that right here in what you post.

Stop listening to the paranoid ravings of the SSPX promoters. Start listening to your bishop. Stop trying to justify schism, start being humble and realize that Catholic Church has always had many forms of spirituality.

Go to you local parish priest, the one who is in communion with your bishop and Rome. Confess the sin of arrogance and pride. Then obediently sit in the pew and actively participate, without criticizing, in whatever Mass your parish priest celebrates.

And while you are doing this, know that the Mass is valid AND licit, and that Christ is truly present in the Holy Eucharist.

Let me close with this. I do not speak in anger or impatience. I feel neither emotion as I write. What I do feel is great empathy and fear for you and your family. While what I have said may be blunt, I am not quite certain how else to express it.

There is one thing you mentioned in an earlier post. You mentioned that you were worried that your daughter may start receiving the Holy Eucharist in her hand instead of on her tongue. I can only say that if, as a father, that is one of your greatest worries, then you are certainly a very fortunate man and must have a very fine daughter and family.
 
Good, post. I don’t know whether he is a lier or not, however you made some great (harsh) but great statements about the SSPX. Regardless of whether they are correct or not about the TLM doesn’t matter because they are suspended schismatic priests. A good Catholic should not attend their services. Is not just the same as attending an Anglican service?
 
What, then, of Mgr Perl of the PCED, who said, one can strictly speaking, fulfil ones Sunday obligation by attending an SSPX Mass, even though they don’t recommend it? They even said that it is appropriate to contribute modestly to the collection? Are we to ignore that?

Mitch
I am going to mention that this letter was sent to a specific person in a specific circumstance and Msgr. Perl made the extra effort to make all know that. We do know that a person is not necessarily sinning by attending a chapel.
 
Good, post. I don’t know whether he is a lier or not, however you made some great (harsh) but great statements about the SSPX. Regardless of whether they are correct or not about the TLM doesn’t matter because they are suspended schismatic priests. A good Catholic should not attend their services. Is not just the same as attending an Anglican service?
It isn’t quite the same; Anglicans lack a valid priesthood, and many teach heresy.

The SSPX are not (yet) as a group Heretics (tho’ some may be), and have valid priesthood.
 
Good, post. I don’t know whether he is a lier or not, however you made some great (harsh) but great statements about the SSPX. Regardless of whether they are correct or not about the TLM doesn’t matter because they are suspended schismatic priests. A good Catholic should not attend their services. Is not just the same as attending an Anglican service?
I was a bit harsh wasn’t I. 😊 Sorry about that.
 
It isn’t quite the same; Anglicans lack a valid priesthood, and many teach heresy.

The SSPX are not (yet) as a group Heretics (tho’ some may be), and have valid priesthood.
Oh, yes I know that however they seem to be moving in that direction.
 
I was a bit harsh wasn’t it. 😊 Sorry about that.
It’s not a problem with me because I understand why this is a tense issue. The SSPX feel like the Church has alienated them, we fell like they are a schismatic group. I think that we both agree that we would like more TLM services, however the SSPX are wanting this so badly that they are willing to go to invalid services. I think really we all should learn from this. If any priests manage to see this thread and read it, I suggest they send it to any other clergy they know. I think that education is the root of the issue, and I pray that a conclusion will somehow come to this issue. I however follow the Bishop of Rome, and am going to start attending a valid TLM service, that I found in my area. I understand that I am lucky because many people do not have the luxury of attending a valid TLM service. I will pray this will change. However I want to make one more point. For everyone who hates the NO, don’t you think that it has served it’s purpose if it manages to bring more people into the Church, and Salvation? I think that it is better if it can do that. That being said, I am no NO fan, however that’s just my opinion.
 
Yes, you are an embarassment to orthodox Catholicism.

Your Abbott
Ouch.:rolleyes: 😃 Seeing how you have nothing to say aside from a copycat retort, all I have to say is keep up the example of Vatican II’s love all, accept all mentality; you’re doing great.:rolleyes:
 
Every week or so, SSPX people here create a new person who have the same pathetic experiences. It’s all very boring, and anyone can see through it. How many other identities have you had here?

Your Abbott
Why don’t you inform us of all his names so we’re aware.:rolleyes:
 
There are several Catholic churches in my city, but no TLM’s, except for the local SSPX chapel, which has Mass twice per month. I fell in love with the TLM,…
Mitch
I did not read everyone else’s responses, because I just want to respond to you with my experiences.

My parents were married in the SSPX a year before it was excommunicated. After the excommunication, my father’s father convinced my parents that they must stay with the Church, and not simply bow to their desire to be safe, and comfortable. They realized that he was right, and they started going to the churches that are in union with Rome and the pope. Now we have moved allot, we have lived in 6 states and 9 homes. We have also been to Great Britian, and Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Liechtenstein. During all those travels and moves, we have been to many different masses, and we have always tried to find masses that were in union with Rome.

As a child my family lived mostly in KS, where there were plently of PFSP masses to go to, so I hardly ever went to a NO until I was in third grade. Then we moved to Birmingham, AL and we could not find a TLM so we had to go to the NO. At first we were perfect little SSPX people (many people who go to the TLM only gain SSPX ways of thinking). We refused to shake hands, we would whisper the credo in Latin to ourselves, and we were not at all friendly to those fools who liked the NO. Well, my parents soon realized how ugly this attitude was in their children, and they also saw how friendly the NO people were. They saw that most of these people were not evil, just that they were going to mass and doing their best to be good Catholics. So our parents told us to shake hands and smile, “You are wishing these people well, don’t act like you are repulsed by them” they said. So we gave in, then our parents told us that if we were to consider mass to fullfil our Sunday obligation, we must participate, so we started saying the responces with the crowd. We hated, communion in the hand, the kiss of peace, holding hands during the Our Father, horrible songs, etc… but we were lucky, we were broken into the NO with EWTN masses, so we did not have the altar girls or any of the other …stuff…
Well, everywhere we go we try to find the TLM, usually it is unavailable. When we lived near Denver, there was a TLM, but the priest was such a grump (for lack of a better word) and his grumpiness came into the way he said the mass and it just wasn’t beautiful. Instead we found a parish with a pretty good NO. The church building was beautiful, and the 10:00am mass was like EWTN’s masses, it was mostly in English, but the parts that stayed the same each week, like the Credo, Sanctus, etc. were in Latin. The music during this mass was pretty. The other masses were also reverent, and there were only altar boys, but the music was horrible.
continued…
 
Part 2
This is what my parents have taught us through the many different masses that we have been to (I am the eldest of six children):
We only sing songs that have words that are in line with Church doctine.
We don’t hold hands during the Our Father.
My brothers are not altar boys with girls.
We know that the reason we do things differently is we have been taught better, and that those other people are not to be looked down upon because they simply don’t know.
After a mass were a priest preaches heracy, or the singer sings a heretical hymn, my father goes up and confronts them, or he writes a letter. Either way, he informs us of his arguments, and we can learn why they were wrong, according to the Church.
We always recieve Holy Communion on the tongue.
We participate in the mass, and try to ignore “bad” songs.

This training has left us strong. We are unafraid of standing up for our faith in front of anyone despite age. We are sure of ourselves, and we know our faith better than most people. We know what we believe, we know that the Church is having troubles, but we believe with all our hearts that we must stay with the Church and fight for right. We must not abandon the Church in her hour of need, but rather join the ranks of people who are fighting within the Church to help regain what was forgotten.

I am 18 years old, and I am going to a Catholic Liberal Arts college next year. My two sisters who are in high school are going to the best public school in Nevada, because the local Catholic high school is more evil than the public schools. We have met more than one priest who said that the reason he is Catholic is that his parents put him in a public high school rather than a “Catholic” one. My three younger siblings go to the most conservative Catholic school in Vegas. It is still a little liberal, so we are constantly discussing religion and my parents write letters to the teachers whenever they find something that is not consistent with Church teachings. It is a constant stuggle, but my parents say that it is worth it if they can raise us to be good Catholics.
I would suggest that you always explain why. Explain why you don’t hold hands, explain why you recieve on the tongue, explain why you don’t sing that song, explain why girls should not be altar servers, explain why the tabernacle should be in the middle, explain why the priest was wrong, but don’t say he is bad, just say that he was mistaken, and if he refuses to face the truth, say that he needs prayers. Remember that Christ started the Catholic Church and he did not say that leaving it for whatever reason was a good idea.

Here in Vegas, we have found an old priest who is trying to start a TLM, but instead of just throwing people into it, he is starting off with a half Latin, half English mass. Every week he teaches the congregation some new part in Latin. On Easter we are going to start singing the Credo. The priest stays after mass for 15min and teaches a new hymn or reviews an old one with the people who stay and those people help the people who could not stay during the next Sunday mass. There are only 50 people who come and only 15 stay after mass for choir practice, but it has grown considerably since it started a couple months ago.
So have hope for a TLM in union with Rome, and if there isn’t that “culture” maybe see if the priest would consider this plan, it helps people to feel less overwhelmed, and more open to the Latin.🤷

Sorry I was so long winded.
Yours Through Our Lady,
Margarite
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top