M
maltmom
Guest
Thank you James. I pray God uses my experiences to bring others closer to Him.Maltmom,
Thank you for that beautiful testimony. I am sure that it will be an encouragement to others.
Peace
James
Thank you James. I pray God uses my experiences to bring others closer to Him.Maltmom,
Thank you for that beautiful testimony. I am sure that it will be an encouragement to others.
Peace
James
Please read the entire post. Don’t stop with the first sentence. You asked in your OP for help with discernment. The life of the saint is a reflection of the decision he/she made. There is no criticism.I’m so glad everyone on here knows more about what goes on for me than I do.
Seriously, I’m sick of no one believing me when I bring this up. I don’t take kindly to being called a liar. Every time I discuss this, it ends up with someone telling me exactly what you’re saying.
How would you like it if I said to you, “the ‘we don’t worship Mary, we venerate her’ thing doesn’t work for me?” It’s that offensive.
But somehow, it’s ok to offend those of us whose spiritual life is a little different from the norm.
I am sorry to the OP for not understanding his orginal post, but that being said what you are saying to me about my “zeal” which I do have, is actually just me posting teachings of St. Louis de Montfort! That’s all I’ve pretty much done here on CAF and all I get in return is “pushed” or “zeal” Now I have done my research, St. Louis de Montfort has been promoted by past Popes, indulgences have been given to those who do St. Louis de Montforts consecration. Blessed John Paul II statedZeal properly disciplined, channeled and applied is a good thing. Zeal not properly disciplined is dangerous. Again - I speak from many years experience as well as observation.
vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/letters/1997/documents/hf_jp-ii_let_19970621_montfort_en.htmlDear brothers and sisters of the great Montfortian Family, in this year of prayer and reflection on the precious heritage of St Louis-Marie, I encourage you: make this treasure bear fruit; it must not remain hidden. The teaching of your founder and master coincides with the themes that the whole Church meditates on at the approach of the Great Jubilee; it marks out for us the path of true wisdom that must be laid open to so many young people who search for meaning in their lives and for an art of living
Indeed Her Son is our only Goal, the final end of all men. I understand not all are on the same level, only the Holy Spirit can guide us. Mary is a gift to us from Jesus and devotion to Her is inspired by him, if thats the way he leads the soul. St. Louis de Montfort wrote if any of the faithful have Jesus in their heart it is thanks to Mary and without her they would not have him! He also said if we were to shed all our blood and travel the roughest roads to obtain Jesus it would be as nothing if not supported by the Blessed Virgin. So do we keep such things in a box in fear of offending someone? To me this is wisdom from a Holy Man a Saint, St. Louis lived amoung the poor, one sermon he gave was him looking at Christ crucified on the Cross and was moved to tears, it converted people.Amen - now lets work together to help her accomplish her desire and goal that you so often point out…Let’s work to lead others to her Son…
I find no anger in your post…I hope you find none in mine.I am sorry to the OP for not understanding his orginal post, but that being said what you are saying to me about my “zeal” which I do have, is actually just me posting teachings of St. Louis de Montfort! That’s all I’ve pretty much done here on CAF and all I get in return is “pushed” or “zeal” Now I have done my research, St. Louis de Montfort has been promoted by past Popes, indulgences have been given to those who do St. Louis de Montforts consecration. Blessed John Paul II stated
vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/letters/1997/documents/hf_jp-ii_let_19970621_montfort_en.html
Like I have said the history of the Church shows it has been promoted. On this website I feel the vibe of caution and I understand that, what you are saying about some are not ready to eat that fruit yet. Does that mean we should be silent? Is there anything wrong with me promoting St. Louis de Montforts teaching? Is not leading others to Mary leading them to Christ, a sure path.
Indeed Her Son is our only Goal, the final end of all men. I understand not all are on the same level, only the Holy Spirit can guide us. Mary is a gift to us from Jesus and devotion to Her is inspired by him, if thats the way he leads the soul. St. Louis de Montfort wrote if any of the faithful have Jesus in their heart it is thanks to Mary and without her they would not have him! He also said if we were to shed all our blood and travel the roughest roads to obtain Jesus it would be as nothing if not supported by the Blessed Virgin. So do we keep such things in a box in fear of offending someone? To me this is wisdom from a Holy Man a Saint, St. Louis lived amoung the poor, one sermon he gave was him looking at Christ crucified on the Cross and was moved to tears, it converted people.
Now on this website St. Louis de Montfort is obviously not understood. He wasn’t understood in his time either. Yet he was obedient to the end and only wished to spread the love of Jesus and Mary.
But with all charity, I do not see the need to live in a closet in fear of my devotion offending someone because I follow St. Louis de Montfort. I think some don’t understand it has to be practiced with faith. We are not supposed to want to see extraordinary things in prayer or of any kind, we have to live by faith, and history of the Church shows Mary keeps nothing for herself but gives it directly to God. It takes trust and faith.
Now am I understanding you right when you say my “zeal” is too much for other people because I post teaching of a Holy man, a Saint of the Catholic Church? Or that my path is wrong and I should go hide in a corner?
James don’t take this post as “anger” I am saying this in charity and trying to understand your point to me!
OP God bless you on your journey, I am here to say St. Louis de Montforts teachings are sound, if your not ready that is fine to, everything starts and ends with Jesus Christ. Eventually he will share his feelings of love and gratitude towards his Mother, and the more we go through her in things the more intense is our union with Christ!
Many spiritual paths have been approved and promoted by the Church, not just those you happen to think are best.I am sorry to the OP for not understanding his orginal post, but that being said what you are saying to me about my “zeal” which I do have, is actually just me posting teachings of St. Louis de Montfort! That’s all I’ve pretty much done here on CAF and all I get in return is “pushed” or “zeal” Now I have done my research, St. Louis de Montfort has been promoted by past Popes, indulgences have been given to those who do St. Louis de Montforts consecration. Blessed John Paul II stated
Like I have said the history of the Church shows it has been promoted. On this website I feel the vibe of caution and I understand that, what you are saying about some are not ready to eat that fruit yet. Does that mean we should be silent? Is there anything wrong with me promoting St. Louis de Montforts teaching? Is not leading others to Mary leading them to Christ, a sure path.
A very nice post…
I think the thing to remember is that it can take time for people to deepen in their understanding of the faith - and some of the ways that we talk.
When we read about and consider the choices made by various saints they can be of great encouragement to us on our own journey and choices for Christ and the Kingdom.
Of course if a person is “inspired” by one saint this year, they might be inspired by a different saint next year - depending on their life situations. But the constant must always be the same as the saints…Living for Christ.
Peace
James
I don’t know whether or not we have strayed from the original intent of this thread. However, I think these two posts combined bring related themes that need to be addressed.Many spiritual paths have been approved and promoted by the Church, not just those you happen to think are best.
Read the Early Church Fathers, particularly the spiritual masters, on prayer and you will see something very different than the approach that you continually advocate others to follow. Does that make them wrong? Did the Desert Fathers not know how to pray or to approach Christ? Was St. Basil somehow lacking in his approach to God; or St. John Cassian; or St. Augustine; or St. Gregory of Nyssa; or Pope St. Gregory the Great; or St. Benedict? Is their path not one that people today can still follow to achieve holiness and union with God? Were their prayers lives lacking because they did not follow the same teachings you do?
I’m glad that you have found a path that you believe works for you. All of us are. What would be nice however, is for you to recognize not everyone is called to walk that same path.
The prayer life of the Early Church Fathers was not based off of private revelation with promises of indulgences. Having said that, I love and venerate many of the medieval spiritual masters (St’s. Dominic and Francis, St. Bernard, the Hermits of Mt. Carmel, etc. are all wonderful, and their teachings can absolutely lead one to Christ).I don’t know whether or not we have strayed from the original intent of this thread. However, I think these two posts combined bring related themes that need to be addressed.
One of the beauties of our Faith is its both it richness and its simplicity. While the basic tenets can all be found in the the Nicene Creed, it can take a lifetime to plumb the depths, and we will never understand everything. It is a mystery to be embraced, not solved. Our devotional life is as individual as we are, and it will change throughout our life as our understanding and circumstances change. The rosary, as an example, developed out of the peasantry, who did not have the time to join in the Liturgy of the Hours with those who lived in the monasteries during the Middle Ages. We forget that for much of history, only the privileged were literate. It is only recently that I learned that the Angelus originated during the time of the Crusades as a prayer of peace and tranquility in France.
Many of the “traditional” prayers that individuals pray come from private revelations. Many do have promises attached to them. One of the warnings I remember from a Jesus Day Conference I attended many years ago is that “it is possible to become so full of the Spirit that a person can lose sight of the Spirit.” The writings of DeMontfort can be overwhelming to a person who is not ready to read them. Terms like “slave” can be off-putting. There are other spiritual writers who can lead individuals to a right devotion of our Mother.
Sometimes the slow, but steady approach to developing a devotional life is the best. That devotional life includes prayer, piety (or study), and action.
I agree with you that their are other paths to Christ. All the men you mention were holy and their example is worthy of being followed.Many spiritual paths have been approved and promoted by the Church, not just those you happen to think are best.
Read the Early Church Fathers, particularly the spiritual masters, on prayer and you will see something very different than the approach that you continually advocate others to follow. Does that make them wrong? Did the Desert Fathers not know how to pray or to approach Christ? Was St. Basil somehow lacking in his approach to God; or St. John Cassian; or St. Augustine; or St. Gregory of Nyssa; or Pope St. Gregory the Great; or St. Benedict? Is their path not one that people today can still follow to achieve holiness and union with God? Were their prayers lives lacking because they did not follow the same teachings you do?
I’m glad that you have found a path that you believe works for you. All of us are. What would be nice however, is for you to recognize not everyone is called to walk that same path.
Any time you see Mary or St DeMontfort attacked - you let me know and I will help you defend them.I agree with you that their are other paths to Christ. All the men you mention were holy and their example is worthy of being followed.
I know you would never say these great men would ever be de canonized like I have be told would happen to the Saint I follow. My goal is not to offend anyone, I only wish to stand up for Mary and St. Louis de Montfort.
I don’t understand this question?My question to everyone is, is it the Spirit of Jesus to wish to be without the help of Mary?
What you see as attacks - many of us see as defense. In your very first post on this this thread you made the (unfounded) accusation that Mary was being attacked. I can’t speak for other threads as I have no inclination to go back and review them…I am sure the great men you mention had some sort of Marian devotion, and it makes me happy that you say you do too. I understand not all are on the same level, I just wish my path wasn’t attacked so much.
Fr. Nicholas Norman said about St. Louis de Montfort’s teachings that “One may imagine the fury of the Evil One as this book was being written. He does his utmost to cloud men’s minds to it’s glories and truths, as he clouded the minds of the Scribes and Pharisees. The Saint prophesied this attack and foretold that his work would be lost awhile, as indeed it was, being rediscovered only in 1842.”
I would love it if you could show me just the posts wherein people have said that your path is not sound (that being the path advocated by DeMontfort).I wish only others to realize my path is indeed sound.
The OP didn’t say this at all!Frequent praying of the Hail Mary hardly constitutes a lack of devotion to her! Anyone who says you are lacking anything in that regard is ridiculous.
The OP goes well beyond - I suspect he or she would be happier if none of us ever prayed a Hail Mary in our lives and banished all images of her from our homes and churches.
Thank you, I hope you will.Any time you see Mary or St DeMontfort attacked - you let me know and I will help you defend them.
Is it the spirit of Jesus do we actually possess his spirit if we wish to do without the help of Our Blessed Lady?I don’t understand this question?
I am sorry for jumping the gun on this thread. OP in another thread stated that St. Louis de Montfort worshipped Mary and that I do also (which both accounts are false). It was also stated that one day St. Louis de Montfort would be de-canonized. Now OP asked me to forgive him his zeal and I do. I am only mentioning these things to show why my zeal got the best of me.What you see as attacks - many of us see as defense. In your very first post on this this thread you made the (unfounded) accusation that Mary was being attacked. I can’t speak for other threads as I have no inclination to go back and review them…
I answered this question above. I don’t want to go back and quote everyone, that is not necessary since I am being honsest.I would love it if you could show me just the posts wherein people have said that your path is not sound (that being the path advocated by DeMontfort).
The Spirit of Christ is the Spirit of God which is Agape - Love (1 John 4:7-8) That Spirit of Love seeks only that which is best for us and we, in possessing that Love through grace seek only that which brings us closer to God.Is it the spirit of Jesus do we actually possess his spirit if we wish to do without the help of Our Blessed Lady?
Yes, I have been exposed to a lot of people like that, here on CA, in my reading, and in real life.OP, I think you are ok with just praying directly to God the Father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. I am assuming that you have been exposed to groups that are very focused on Marian apparitions, as these usually are the people who urge others to pray the rosary daily. Sometimes they are so desperate to have people follow the same devotion that have helped them in their own life, that their “urging” is more like pushing, insisting, and make those who do not follow the same devotion feel guilty.
This is an excellent question. I know the history of the development of the rosary. As mentioned in an earlier post, the rosary began in the Middle Ages when peasants wanted to share in the prayers of the monasteries but did not have the same time or literacy. They began by saying 150 Pater Nosters, Our Fathers, the same number of psalms in the Bible that the monks recited daily. To keep count, the peasants used stones which were later strung on a rope. Over time, the Our Fathers, were replaced, and divided into the decades of Hail Marys with which we are familiar.I think some people here are being a little rough on the OP. I have a question, that I guess I should know the answer to, but don’t. When did the actual prayer ( Hail Mary) start to be said by the faithful. I know part of it is scriptural, but when did it start to be recited? When is the earliest in recorded church history does it mention this prayer. Maybe if the OP knows the history behind this prayer, it will be easier to accept…
There is an article in the Catholic Encyclopedia on the prayer HERE that is quite interesting. It says, in part…I think some people here are being a little rough on the OP. I have a question, that I guess I should know the answer to, but don’t. When did the actual prayer ( Hail Mary) start to be said by the faithful. I know part of it is scriptural, but when did it start to be recited? When is the earliest in recorded church history does it mention this prayer. Maybe if the OP knows the history behind this prayer, it will be easier to accept.
(Snip)