J
JRKH
Guest
I can see where that might cause one to have a bad attitude toward the OP…But I have to say that it does little credit to you, to St DeMontfort, or to Our Lady to make the same error by making such a blanket and inaccurate accusation as you did here.OP stated to me in another thread that I “worshipped” Mary and to just “admit it”
If the contents of this thread illustrate what you consider to be efforts to “denounce devotion to Mary”, I suggest you stop, calm down and then carefully and prayerfully reread each and every post here.There were numerous threads trying to denounce devotion to Mary. Trying to separate Christ from Mary which can’t be done.
Not one person here has tried to separate Mary from Christ. Not one person has “denounced” devotion to Mary - let alone encouraged anyone to reject her.
I agree that Mary is necessary…As I’m sure that all Catholics her would…the discussion is not about whether Mary is necessary to the “mystery of the incarnation”.I consider Mary necessary not an option the mystery of the Incarnation justifies my belief.
I am happy to forgive - I too take offense when Mary is attacked. However it is important to a) recognize what is an “attack” and what is legitimate discussion and b) choosing the proper methods to respond in each case.Forgive my zeal, I take offense at Mary being attacked as if she is a rival of Christ.
In response to your earlier post “Oneofthewomen” responded how such remaks can just make others “Dig in their heels”. I seem to recall making a somewhat similar remark to you on another thread.
I hope that you will give some consideration to the idea that - if you wish to draw people to Christ through Mary, that perhaps you should use methods that are more gentle and understanding…you know …like a Loving Mother would use.
No doubt…Maybe I should of worded it a little better, again forgive my zeal
Zeal is fine…but can be counterproductive.
And you my friend.God Bless You
Peace
james