Discuss: Confession Face to Face: Bad Idea?

  • Thread starter Thread starter superamazingman
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Fr. Z in his blog talks about how priests can actually refuse to hear confessions face to face. If a priest ever did that, I would be very wary of him afterwards. (Is he afraid? What is he afraid of? Me? Does he suspect I will do something to him? Is he afraid of the situation? Is he not comfortable hearing confessions at all?).
Obviously, he’s not afraid of you. But it might not be best to go on a case by case basis. So… he would do that for everyone.
 
Fr. Z in his blog talks about how priests can actually refuse to hear confessions face to face. If a priest ever did that, I would be very wary of him afterwards. (Is he afraid? What is he afraid of? Me? Does he suspect I will do something to him? Is he afraid of the situation? Is he not comfortable hearing confessions at all?).
That’s a horrible set of assumptions. No priest can every be pressured into a face-to-face confession unless the penitent is on his death bed. My parish only has the option of behind the screen confessions. There are many reasons a priest may feel this is a better approach and he is completely within his rights to do so.

Now, on the other hand, if a priest** only **offers face-to-face confession, he is not within his rights and you would have every reason to be wary of him and to go elsewhere if possible.
 
There are many reasons a priest may feel this is a better approach
I cannot think of any - pls give some examples. Also “feeling it is a better approach” is still nowhere near refusing face-to-face confession.
if a priest** only **offers face-to-face confession (…) you would have every reason to be wary of him and to go elsewhere if possible.
I personally wouldn’t, provided I would go to him in the first place (unless it’s an emergency, I choose rather carefully where I go and I would never go to someone just because face-to-face is offered). But the point is that he should offer what people want, I don’t believe either method is essentially wrong. Many churches in my area only offer confession by appointment anyway and once you have to call or email anyway, you can also say how you want to do it. I have no problem with people who want to do it in the box (the way you confess also changes over time, as you, as a person and as a Christ-follower change) but I would be rather unhappy if the Church suddenly decided that was the only way. (Not that I think it could be enforced anyway.)
 
…but I would be rather unhappy if the Church suddenly decided that was the only way.
Actually, the church has already decided that. Anytime you receive face to face, it is purely because the priest has chosen to allow it in that instance, and nothing more. Canonically, the universal way is behind the screen.
 
An interesting article. The parish I currently attend doesn’t even have a confessional, and the priest simply sits in the church and hears confession there, and while giving absolution HE DOES put his hand on people, and authorities don’t come after him, and as far as I know he didn’t need a lawyer yet.

It all boils down to culture. I’m currently where I am for some months, and touching here is totally acceptable. Who knows how acceptable it will be in the next place I happen to be?

My opinion, it’s all culture.
wdtprs.com/blog/2012/10/quaeritur-face-to-face-confession-fr-z-rants/

Go read the article and let’s discuss it here. He takes a very interesting point with the problems of face to face confession:

Let’s have at it?
 
An interesting article. The parish I currently attend doesn’t even have a confessional, and the priest simply sits in the church and hears confession there, and while giving absolution HE DOES put his hand on people, and authorities don’t come after him, and as far as I know he didn’t need a lawyer yet.
yet.
 
An interesting article. The parish I currently attend doesn’t even have a confessional, and the priest simply sits in the church and hears confession there, and while giving absolution HE DOES put his hand on people, and authorities don’t come after him, and as far as I know he didn’t need a lawyer yet.

It all boils down to culture. I’m currently where I am for some months, and touching here is totally acceptable. Who knows how acceptable it will be in the next place I happen to be?

My opinion, it’s all culture.
maybe your parish should look at investing in a confessional…

Can. 964 §2. The conference of bishops is to establish norms regarding the confessional; it is to take care, however, that there are always confessionals with a fixed grate between the penitent and the confessor in an open place so that the faithful who wish to can use them freely.
 
Actually, the church has already decided that. Anytime you receive face to face, it is purely because the priest has chosen to allow it in that instance, and nothing more. Canonically, the universal way is behind the screen.
Please keep in mind the universal Church when stating that something is the universal way of doing things. Anonymous Confessions are not a part of the tradition of the Eastern lung of the Catholic (universal) church. I’m not arguing the merits of such in the Western Church, simply stating a fact. I know it must seem that we Easterners are always harping on this sort of thing, but the current or even historical and traditional practice of the Latin church does not make for a universal norm.
 
Please keep in mind the universal Church when stating that something is the universal way of doing things. Anonymous Confessions are not a part of the tradition of the Eastern lung of the Catholic (universal) church. I’m not arguing the merits of such in the Western Church, simply stating a fact. I know it must seem that we Easterners are always harping on this sort of thing, but the current or even historical and traditional practice of the Latin church does not make for a universal norm.
I’m not denying that, but don’t forget that this is a latin rite board, in the latin rite L&S forum… I shouldn’t really need to specify that I’m talking latin rite…
 
I cannot think of any - pls give some examples. Also “feeling it is a better approach” is still nowhere near refusing face-to-face confession.
Well, here’s a few reasons:
  1. space - since anonymous must always be available, there isn’t always room for both an anonymous and face-to-face option in the same space.
  2. money - in older churches the confessionals are designed for anonymous confessions. It costs money to do a remodel, money that the priest might feel is better spent on something else.
  3. size of the parish. I belong to a very small parish. Sometimes, my kids and I are the only ones there at the beginning of Confession time. A priest might think that face-to-face with no one else within eyesight is not prudent.
  4. diocisan policy - not common in the US but in other countries, face-to-face is unheard of
  5. personal preference. You have expressed a strong preference for face-to-face. Why is it so hard to understand that a priest might have the opposite preference?
I personally wouldn’t, provided I would go to him in the first place (unless it’s an emergency, I choose rather carefully where I go and I would never go to someone just because face-to-face is offered). But the point is that he should offer what people want
Sure, but only within what the Church allows. The Church does not allow a priest to only offer face-to-face confessions. If a priest does that, it means he is operating outside the norms of the Church which is usually a bad sign.
I don’t believe either method is essentially wrong. Many churches in my area only offer confession by appointment anyway and once you have to call or email anyway, you can also say how you want to do it.
We don’t have much of that here. I don’t know of any parish that doesn’t have scheduled times.
I have no problem with people who want to do it in the box (the way you confess also changes over time, as you, as a person and as a Christ-follower change) but I would be rather unhappy if the Church suddenly decided that was the only way. (Not that I think it could be enforced anyway)
Well, it was that way for hundreds of years but I can understand why you might be unhappy. I was around when the Church suddenly allowed face-to-face and I don’t think the right to an anonymous confession was restored until the 1983 canon law. I tried it (face-to-face) twice and didn’t go back for over 20 years. 😦
 
Except when you say “universal”. 🙂
When the term universal is applied to canon law or to the rubrics, it doesn’t extend to the Eastern Churches by default. The Church for example says things like “the universal norm is to kneel during the consecration.” That doesn’t mean that it applies to the Eastern Churches since rubrics, by definintion are for one Church at a time. 😉
 
If it was up to me, and if I was the pastor of a church, I would probably have see-through grates installed with small velvetish curtains on the priest’s side in front of them. They would be closed for anonymous confession by default and if the penitent wanted to confess face-to-face, he could say so and the curtains would be pushed back. I would also require completely separate entrances for both priest and penitent leading into the confessional. This allows either style, while physically preventing accusations as much as possible in either case. This would also allow for the possibility of the priest being able to refuse face-to-face confessions, as is his right, if he judges it necessary or if he wants it.

This is a pretty simple solution that can be installed quite easily in most existing “box” style confessionals, but it might pose a problem for the silly “reconciliation room” set-up. Disregarding the psychological implications of anonymous vs. face-to-face confession, I think this is the best and most common-sense approach, which is of course why it probably doesn’t exist. (just kidding)

With box-style confessionals, a reasonably well-bodied priest can install this or can have a parishioner do it in less than an hour for very little money. Personally I view this from the perspective of protecting the priest and the penitent and I see it as quite imperative and such an easy thing to fix.
At the abbey I’m affiliated with, there’s an option for either face-to-face or behind a screen. The “confessional” is actually a reconciliation room at the back of the conventual chapel, but it’s very well set up. When you enter there’s a large screen with a prie-dieu in front of it. The priest by default sits behind the screen. Well beyond the screen there are two chairs, one for the priest and one for the penitent. If you want anonymous, you kneel when entering the room and the priest is behind the screen so you don’t get to see them (but since I know all the monks I can identify him anyway!). If you move further you sit in the chair and the priest will move from behind the screen to sit with you for face-to-face. Since I know all the monk-priests it doesn’t really matter for me! The regular confessor is a wonderful 80 y.o. priest who is also the abbey’s historian. But sometimes he’s away and there’s a substitute.

It’s a pretty good system that allows for both preferences. I prefer face-to-face because the regular confessor knows me, knows my issues, and gives very good advice.
 
Picky picky picky, as I see it. The quote might be true, but it is also anecdotal and antiquated. When the majority of Catholics may never partake of the Sacrament (or all too rarely), why this focus on the physical aspect rather than the spiritual aspect? How is criticism of the mechanics of the Sacrament intended to invite the sinful back into the confessional?
Too true, about 70% of professed Catholics make Reconciliation one a year or less (i.e. never), according to the Fordham U. study.
 
Too true, about 70% of professed Catholics make Reconciliation one a year or less (i.e. never), according to the Fordham U. study.
I wonder what the statistics are for those who attend Mass regularly? It is always so misleading when we see statistics like this because Mass attendance is so low. I would be interested to know the frequency of Confession for those who are actively practicing the faith.
 
If I could I would go every other day. My poor priest would have a coronary though. I guess its hard putting up with me once a week even. 😛
Me too. At this point in my life, a week is tops. Usually it’s every 5-10 days.
 
I wonder what the statistics are for those who attend Mass regularly? It is always so misleading when we see statistics like this because Mass attendance is so low. I would be interested to know the frequency of Confession for those who are actively practicing the faith.
How often, if ever, do you participate in the
Sacrament of Reconciliation or Confession?

By Mass Attendance

Weekly or more, Less than weekly but at least once a month, A few times a year or less

Once a month or more 6% 2% 0%
Several times a year 31 17 2
Once a year 25 18 4
Less than once a year 23 41 28
Never 15 22 66

Sorry, I tried to put in spaces, but the editor cut them all out. Find this sort of info here. It is a pdf file.

So this is saying that of those who go to mass at least weekly, 38% go to confession less than once a year or never. I get that by adding 23 and 15.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top