W
WanderAimlessly
Guest
As many of you know, I am not a fan of the Extraordinary Form of the Mass but I do recognize both its validity and necessity.
However, I has a discussion with a Deacon from the Archdiocese of Milwaukee today about how my parish celebrates the Mass (and why I switched to the parish):
However, I has a discussion with a Deacon from the Archdiocese of Milwaukee today about how my parish celebrates the Mass (and why I switched to the parish):
*]Both forms (Ordinary and Extra Ordinary is used)
*]All Masses are Ad Orientum
*]All Masses use the Altar Rail and Communion on the Tongue using intinction.
*]Chant
*]Extensive use of Latin (in the Ordinary Form it is priest specific on how much is used).
He is still under the impression:
*]Extraordinary Form of the Mass was abrogated (He even seems to be unaware of Summorum Pontificum which I mentioned. :bigyikes: )
*]Ad Orientum is not allowed.
*]Altar Rail and Communion on the tongue are not allowed.
*]Latin is not allowed.
Now I know the Archdiocese has had trouble with previous administration(s) in the Archdiocese, but is it so bad there that the ordained ministry is unaware of what Rome has said?
He has said prove my assertions but I am not sure he would accept anything I have to say.