B
BobCatholic
Guest
The distortion of evidence always comes from those who believe that people are nothing but walking genitalia, and that people have no choice but to hump anything that moves. This is the result of the 1960’s “sexual liberation” - they dehumanize people by making them out to be nothing but hormonal actors, These “sexually liberated” types do not believe there is any ethics at all in the sexual sphere, and thus they see people in this dark twisted way.
It is they who think that abstinence education is not the answer, for if it were, they’d have to change their way of thinking of how they see people.
Every time someone brings up scientific evidence that condoms are not as safe as posited by the “sexually liberated” they must quickly shut down all discussion by impugning the character of the objector as “trying to impose religion on others” or “being sexually repressed” instead of dealing with the actual science.
Science separated from morality = Dr. Mengele. This has been proven time and time again thoughout history.
It is they who think that abstinence education is not the answer, for if it were, they’d have to change their way of thinking of how they see people.
Every time someone brings up scientific evidence that condoms are not as safe as posited by the “sexually liberated” they must quickly shut down all discussion by impugning the character of the objector as “trying to impose religion on others” or “being sexually repressed” instead of dealing with the actual science.
Science separated from morality = Dr. Mengele. This has been proven time and time again thoughout history.
