P
PJM
Guest
VERY GOOD:thumbsup:Tell you what; is there anyone in your life that you love? Parents? Siblings? Spouse? Children? Friends? Prove it through material evidence.
GBY!
Patrick [the OP]
VERY GOOD:thumbsup:Tell you what; is there anyone in your life that you love? Parents? Siblings? Spouse? Children? Friends? Prove it through material evidence.
OKSoul not physical.
Like my dog’s soul, if extant and heaven-bound, won’t be physical.
WHY is that?:banghead:
The Church has spoken on this.
This question brings out the WORST in posters.
Very good, thanksThey have a mortal soul which dies at death. Only humans have an immortal soul which is forever. The short answer is no they don’t go to heaven. (Look up St. Thomas Aquinas about animal and plants having souls)
amen!:dinstead of worrying about our pet being in heaven, we should make sure we are going to be there.![]()
Was Solomon referring to animals, or ungodly men?Scripture does not say, but does not deny animals will be in the resurrection. The Preacher in Ecclesiastes writes (chpt. 3)
For what happens to the children of man and what happens to the beasts is the same; as one dies, so dies the other. They all have the same breath, and man has no advantage over the beasts, for all is vanity. All go to one place. All are from the dust, and to dust all return. Who knows whether the spirit of man goes upward and the spirit of the beast goes down into the earth?
As for the content or type of an animal’s soul, Scripture also hints that there is more to the animal soul than we grant it credit for, since we cannot reason with them as with each other (although reason is used very little in this country and world today).
I am recalling Balaam’s donkey in the book of Numbers (20, I believe). This donkey manifested reason and moral thought after ‘I AM’ opened the donkey’s mouth. It does not say he was “inspired” with words and thoughts to speak, just his mouth was opened, and what was already within this donkey had a path of expression. He also used the personal pronouns to refer to himself and Balaam, indicating a relationship of persons.
“Just a ‘story’”, if just a story, what part is not real? The donkey reasoning part? The angel of ‘I AM’ blocking the way? ‘I AM’ telling Balaam what to say to the King multiple times? The whole book of Numbers?
Know the LORD who knew Balaam’s donkey when you speak with God about your pet, and remember the preacher.
Beasts means animals, lions, tigers, bears, dogs, cats, cows, goats.Was Solomon referring to animals, or ungodly men?
Yes, you are probably correct. But I’m not convinced this is an affirmation for possible animal resurrection. What is Solomon trying to say here? For sure, he is stating the obvious, that both beasts and man die, then they decompose back into the matter of dirt. He then “seems” to imply that the “spirit” (or life?) of man and beast might die or live on, right? So according to this logic, is he saying man may not live on in heaven?Beasts means animals, lions, tigers, bears, dogs, cats, cows, goats.
Solomon would have called an ungodly man by the term “the ungodly” or “the unrighteous” or “the evil man”, etc.
We need another and a wiser and perhaps a more mystical concept of animals. Remote from universal nature, and living by complicated artifice, man in civilization surveys the creature through the glass of his knowledge and sees thereby a feather magnified and the whole image in distortion.
We patronize them for their incompleteness, for their tragic fate of having taken form so far below ourselves. And therein we err, and greatly err.
For the animal shall not be measured by man. In a world older and more complete than ours they move finished and complete, gifted with extensions of the senses we have lost or never attained, living by voices we shall never hear.
They are not brethren, they are not underlings; they are other nations, caught with ourselves in the net of life and time, fellow prisoners of the splendour and travail of the earth. The Outermost House
My friend. WHAT bible version are you quoting? *Scripture does not say, but does not deny animals will be in the resurrection. The Preacher in Ecclesiastes writes (chpt. 3)
For what happens to the children of man and what happens to the beasts is the same; as one dies, so dies the other. They all have the same breath, and man has no advantage over the beasts, for all is vanity. All go to one place. All are from the dust, and to dust all return. Who knows whether the spirit of man goes upward and the spirit of the beast goes down into the earth?
As for the content or type of an animal’s soul, Scripture also hints that there is more to the animal soul than we grant it credit for, since we cannot reason with them as with each other (although reason is used very little in this country and world today).
I am recalling Balaam’s donkey in the book of Numbers (20, I believe). This donkey manifested reason and moral thought after ‘I AM’ opened the donkey’s mouth. It does not say he was “inspired” with words and thoughts to speak, just his mouth was opened, and what was already within this donkey had a path of expression. He also used the personal pronouns to refer to himself and Balaam, indicating a relationship of persons.
“Just a ‘story’”, if just a story, what part is not real? The donkey reasoning part? The angel of ‘I AM’ blocking the way? ‘I AM’ telling Balaam what to say to the King multiple times? The whole book of Numbers?
Know the LORD who knew Balaam’s donkey when you speak with God about your pet, and remember the preacher.
19Therefore the death of man, and of beasts is one, and the condition of them both is equal: as man dieth, so they also die: all things breathe alike, and man hath nothing more than beast: all things are subject to vanity. 20And all things go to one place: of earth they were made, and into earth they return together. 21Who knoweth if the spirit of the children of Adam ascend upward, and if the spirit of the beasts descend downward? 22And I have found that nothing is better than for a man to rejoice in his work, and that this is his portion. For who shall bring him to know the things that shall be after him?
Correct, he is saying we do not know; and correct, Solomon is not asserting animal resurrection.Yes, you are probably correct. But I’m not convinced this is an affirmation for possible animal resurrection. What is Solomon trying to say here? For sure, he is stating the obvious, that both beasts and man die, then they decompose back into the matter of dirt. He then “seems” to imply that the “spirit” (or life?) of man and beast might die or live on, right? So according to this logic, is he saying man may not live on in heaven?
I think he is saying that, according to our wisdom, we cannot know. But we do know, according to God’s revelation, that man is saved from death and offered eternal life with Him. So I find this a difficult passage to conclude that Solomon is promoting the belief in an animal resurrection.
Btw, I am not opposed to believing that the new heaven and Earth will have animals. I just don’t believe in a resurrection of animals.
My friend. WHAT bible version are you quoting? *
I did a bile search of the Douay & the RSV and could NOT locate it:shrug:
GBY
Patrick*
Hi Patrick,
Darknight is correct; I quoted ESV (from a quick search online for copy and paste, so I did not have to type it all myself).
It seems that around the mid 20th century that American English stopped liking the word “beast” and switched to “animal”
NIV: "21 Who knows if the human spirit rises upward and if the spirit of the animal goes down into the earth?”
THANK YOU!John Martin is quoting the English Standard Version.
Douay-Rheims uses this wording:
Ecclesiastes chpt 3: 19-22 for the spirit of man vs spirit of animal questionTHANK YOU!
Can you please supply the book, chapter and verses; I’d like to read more on this
God Bless you
Patrick
THANKS:thumbsup:Ecclesiastes chpt 3: 19-22 for the spirit of man vs spirit of animal question
Numbers chpt 22: 22-35 for the Balaam’s donkey narrative