A
adamhovey1988
Guest
I am not an expert on this, but I would imagine that some early Lutherans at least did. Maybe some Anglicans and Methodists.
So then she is not like the woman travailing in Revelations?The priest who sermonized at one of the Masses I attended yesterday about how Mary didn’t die also claimed she didn’t feel any pain of childbirth
I think an early father wrote about Mary saying, " of her end no man knows".( Ambrose or Jerome?)Then in the evening I went to another Mass 11 miles away and heard a priest preach that Mary actually did die.
Because arguing from the standpoint of silence is a freshman mistake down at the local Seminary- hermeneutics class. It makes for a weak and unconvincing argument. But if you could give me the names of those 1st Century apostolic voices who supported it, I may want to pay more attention. When I say apostolic, I mean those who were eye-witness to the resurrection.Why, then, deny the constant oral tradition of the Church from the earliest times?
And I suppose add a human will governed by the prince of this world, and we be slaves to one side or the other?There is no contradiction in terms between a human will governed by God and a thinking human.
“Of it’s own accord” is strange to me, I mean to put humanity of it’s own accord reconciling with God…though indeed we are reconciled…only one human needed perfection, to serve as propitiation, not two.That she was spared from Original Sin meant that humanity, as represented by her, have an opportunity to reconcile with God of its own accord. Eve choose sin, Mary chose Christ.
Ok…she most certainly did…Of it’s own accord’ is probably a poor way of stating it, maybe ‘of humanity’s own choosing’ would be better. All I mean is that perhaps The Blessed Virgin had an active role in the promise of salvation.