F
fbl9
Guest
You hypocrit,you condenm catholics for beleiving what we beleive,yet say we teach against the word of God when we “according to you condemn others” or say that they can be saved.At any rate, questions aside for now, there are additional problems with believing that Jesus was speaking of the Eucharist when He said, “…unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man…”
First are the problems I have already stated – If Jesus is speaking literally than He is contradicting Himself and others such as the Apostle Paul.
But there are other problems with this interpretation as well for the CC refers to protestants as “separated brethren” indicating that even though they are “separated”, they remain “brethren”. However, Jesus said, “Amen, amen…” indicating that His word is unchangeable and irreversible.
Therefore even the CC does not take Jesus’ words literally for if the church truly believed Jesus’ word they would not call those whom Jesus has clearly excluded from His kingdom, “brethren”.
Not only does the CC refer to protestants as “brethren”, but the CC also teaches that even some Muslims and Jews and even pagans are part of the CC even though Jesus clearly excludes them from His kingdom when He loudly proclaims, “Amen, amen…”
But there is another problem with this theology. This theology is opposed to the love and grace of God.
Why would God allow His Son to suffer humiliation and rejection and crucifixion and shame – all for the purpose of saving whoever calls upon His name – only to reject them from His kingdom because they failed to be part of a religious ritual? God desires all men to be saved and is not willing that any perish.
Certainly God desires His church to celebrate communion and to remember Him in the breaking of bread but God has redeemed us from the law. Why would God redeem us from one law only to condemn us with a new law? This is an argument against the love and mercy and grace of God.
Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us (for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree”)… [Gal 3:13]
For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved. [John 3:17]
- If Jesus is speaking literally in John 6:53 He is clearly contradicting both Himself and the teachings of the Apostles whom He inspired to write the NT.
- Even the CC does not take Jesus’ words literally for the CC clearly teaches that protestants and others are part of the universal church. The CC includes in the universal church those whom Jesus clearly excluded from His kingdom when He said, “Amen, amen…”
- This interpretation opposes the love and mercy of God. It declares that God is more concerned with ritual then with humility and brokenness and faith for it teaches that God does indeed exclude some, even those who have called upon the name of Jesus, from eternal life for failing to receive the Eucharist in the CC.
Where is there any condridiction between a littral belief and what the apostle’s taught? There is none ,give it up and admit that you are fighting the truth.
where does any teaching of the church go against God’s love and mercy? oh yeah when it says that other can be saved without the church?