…that are routinely carried out by pretty much every other first-world country.Sanders entire platform is based on crazy, untenable promises…
The only response to your argument that I’ve ever seen that seemed serious is that the United States’ population is too ‘heterogeneous’ to make this work … which I’ve never quite understood.…that are routinely carried out by pretty much every other first-world country.
You know a “Medicare for All” system of some sort is how pretty much every other nation on the planet where people don’t live on dirt floors administers their healthcare, right?
The failicy of thinking we don’t already have a system that does a form of wealth transfer is ignoring that those with insurance are already paying higher healthcare prices for those who can’t afford insurance. Preventative healthcare reduces the overall cost to society, including future healthcare costs. It will probably also reduce the number of people on permanent disability, which is essentially welfare for life.Sanders entire platform is based on crazy, untenable promises given by people who will never be affected by them to those who will get what they “want” but suffer in other ways and be happy about it.
So he’s trying to appeal to Trump voters who base their vote on crazy, untenable promises.Sanders entire platform is based on crazy, untenable promises given by people who will never be affected by them to those who will get what they “want” but suffer in other ways and be happy about it.
I think that’s a game all politicians play. However, I was referring to some of his other ridiculous gestures of grandeur like “free” college.Xanthippe_Voorhees:![]()
So he’s trying to appeal to Trump voters who base their vote on crazy, untenable promises.Sanders entire platform is based on crazy, untenable promises given by people who will never be affected by them to those who will get what they “want” but suffer in other ways and be happy about it.
Oh I’ll make no claim that these systems are perfect. No complex system is.A deeper look “under the hood” reveals many issues with those types of systems. I mean that poor baby Charlie Gerard was just in the news. America might not have it perfect, but we have freedoms and options other “advanced” nations do not.
Just because “everyone” does it, by no means makes it good or tenable. The rich still have private coverage and the poor, while cared for, are on a mediocre system that has them waiting months for things.
No room for that kind of rhetoric here.Retard-
Only as a matter of scale.From the linked IBD article:
"But let’s start with this. There is no industrialized country in the world that has a government-run health care system as vast as the one Sanders proposes.
Not one."
I think ‘free’ college is doable, but it would require an overhaul in the educational system so that tuition isn’t a subsidy for a professors who barely work and administrators who make way, way too much money and are far too numerous.I think that’s a game all politicians play. However, I was referring to some of his other ridiculous gestures of grandeur like “free” college.
Not according to the article. Sanders wants everything covered, no exceptions. No other nation does that. Again, from the article:Only as a matter of scale.
We could probably cut back a little on military spending…if you want a prominent military bottomless pit, look up the F35 project. We spend 1 third of military expenditures world wide and many of the other top 10 spenders are NATO allies.tting a “bottomless pit” to pay for it would only do further damage.