B
Bookcat
Guest
Huh?Frankly, whether this is intended or not, your posts most always come across as very anti-Eastern. They purposely emphasize universality of thought, theology, and obligation, whereas the Catholic Church herself embraces unity in diversity (see below, as an example).
Never anti- Eastern. Only anti-misuderstanding of what has been proposed as “Eastern Catholic” where as it is simply not. I have quoted left and right not only documents of the Magisterium of the Catholic Church but also from Eastern Catholic Sites and Patriarchs.
Look if someone came here and said “Eastern Catholics do not accept the Pope”. Well I am going to say yes they most certainly do.
Or if they a Protestant came and said “Eastern Catholics are not allowed to read the Bible” I am going to say most certainly are and are very encouraged to do so.
Likewise if someone says “Eastern Catholics do not believe in mortal sin and venial sin” I am going to say --yes they most certainly do.
Why? Because all Catholics accept the Pope as the Successor of Peter, and all Catholics can of course read the Bible and are very encouraged to do so and all Catholics are to believe that there is such a thing as mortal and venial sin --even if terms or spiritualitieson how to work on them etc can yes vary.