M
Merrick
Guest
Do Eastern Catholics obtain indulgences? How do they understand this practice? How does it fit into Eastern theology?
why do you think that they would not be able to? AFAIK they are available to all Catholics who meet the normal requirements, meaning confession, receiving the Eucharist and a prayer for the intentions of the pope. i have no idea about the practice of eastern orthodox peeps.
- Patriarchs can grant a partial indulgence in each place, even if exempt, of their respective patriarchies, in churches of their rite outside the territory of their patriarchates, and to the faithful of their rite everywhere. Major Archbishops have the same faculty.
I haven’t made my question clear enough. I know all Catholics can obtain indulgences. But do most Eastern Catholics seek to? How might such a person understand the practice within the context of their Eastern spirituality?They are Catholics so yes!
Both Eastern and Latin Catholics have the opportunity to utilize, if you will, indulgences as found in the Enchiridion.I haven’t made my question clear enough. I know all Catholics can obtain indulgences. But do most Eastern Catholics seek to? How might such a person understand the practice within the context of their Eastern spirituality?
Byzantine Bishop Andrew Pataki declared the Basilian Monastery Basilian Fathers Of Mariapoch in Matawan NJ and the Cathedral of Saint Michael the Archangel, Passaic NJ as the designated pilgrimage sites for reception of a plenary indulgence for the Holy Year (1999-2001).I’m not certain about Byzantine theology, but in Syriac theology an indulgence would be redundant because if someone has received the remission of sin (e.g. through absolution or the reception of communion) than the entirety of their sin is forgiven - there isn’t some lingering temporal punishment aspect. If there were, that would be to say God’s mercy is either limited or not as vast as Scripture and Tradition tells us it is, or that He does not have entire authority over Judgment. Indulgences are an exclusively Latin practice as such and if any Eastern Catholics seek them out it’s because they are adhering to a Latin practice and not an authentically Eastern practice.
I’m not looking to create contention, I’m simply responding to the question posed by the OP.
Yes! :clapping:I’m not certain about Byzantine theology, but in Syriac theology an indulgence would be redundant because if someone has received the remission of sin (e.g. through absolution or the reception of communion) than the entirety of their sin is forgiven - there isn’t some lingering temporal punishment aspect. If there were, that would be to say God’s mercy is either limited or not as vast as Scripture and Tradition tells us it is, or that He does not have entire authority over Judgment. Indulgences are an exclusively Latin practice as such and if any Eastern Catholics seek them out it’s because they are adhering to a Latin practice and not an authentically Eastern practice.
I’m not looking to create contention, I’m simply responding to the question posed by the OP.
His Grace Bishop Pataki is recognized among many Eastern Catholics as not being the most “Eastern-minded” of bishops. One would do better to discuss the issue with Bishops John Michael Botean, John Kudrick, and/or Nicholas Samra. Heck, you could always just go straight to the top and talk to Patriarch Gregorios III; I’m sure he’d have a good deal to say on the matter.Byzantine Bishop Andrew Pataki declared the Basilian Monastery Basilian Fathers Of Mariapoch in Matawan NJ and the Cathedral of Saint Michael the Archangel, Passaic NJ as the designated pilgrimage sites for reception of a plenary indulgence for the Holy Year (1999-2001).
The Catechism of the Catholic Church has that sin has a double consequence:
So for (2) temporal effect, the holy faithful who do the works necessary, can receive an indulgence for themselves, or assign it to the faithfully departed.
- eternal - loss of communion with God, and
- temporal - unhealthy attachment to creatures
CCC 1473 The forgiveness of sin and restoration of communion with God entail the remission of the eternal punishment of sin, but temporal punishment of sin remains.
What is the objective standard for eastern minded?His Grace Bishop Pataki is recognized among many Eastern Catholics as not being the most “Eastern-minded” of bishops. One would do better to discuss the issue with Bishops John Michael Botean, John Kudrick, and/or Nicholas Samra. Heck, you could always just go straight to the top and talk to Patriarch Gregorios III; I’m sure he’d have a good deal to say on the matter.
Excellent question.What is the objective standard for eastern minded?
Well for starters, one who possesses an eastern mind wouldn’t quote Latin canons and codes in place of theology.What is the objective standard for eastern minded?
Well it is an interesting topic, and especially so when considering the Antiochian influences in the various sui iuris Churches, especially the Melkites who came in time to the jurisdiction of Constantinople. Melkite Bishop John wrote: You ask whether or not Eastern Catholics are to believe in indulgences. Yes, I too have heard some folks remark that the doctrine is incompatible with Eastern theology, however, they are sadly mistaken.Well for starters, one who possesses an eastern mind wouldn’t quote Latin canons and codes in place of theology.
To speak of an objective “eastern” mind would be difficult because of the different traditions in the East. Again, I will deal with what I know. An “objectively” Syro-Maronite mentality would probably be something consistent with the organic theological development from Pentecost to the Synod of Mt. Lebanon [1736] when Latin theology was abruptly and inorganically imposed. As an example, the sudden anathematizing of infant communion shows a discontinuity with the practice of the Maronite Church for the two millennia prior. There’s something to be said about the legitimacy of organic tradition constituting the “objective” mentality of a group, especially since popes since Leo XIII have been exhorting us to return to our traditional patrimonies. The kind of rigid mechanical nature of indulgences is inconsistent with a Syro-Maronite mentality (to focus on what I know). I’m not saying indulgences are outside the Latin Church hierarchy’s oikonomia but it’s an example of inorganic imposition.
Indeed. And part of the problem is that the matter of indulgences is one of those things that so many “Eastern” apologists will try rationalize in order to justify an alien (and inorganic) imposition.Well for starters, one who possesses an eastern mind wouldn’t quote Latin canons and codes in place of theology. …
The kind of rigid mechanical nature of indulgences is inconsistent with a Syro-Maronite mentality (to focus on what I know). I’m not saying indulgences are outside the Latin Church hierarchy’s oikonomia but it’s an example of inorganic imposition.
Thank you!I belong to the syromalabar church, second largest eastern church, evangelised by st thomas the apostle, having no shortage of priests(my church has three, there are churches every few kilometres, we send priests to foreign nations).
We believe in indulgences, with beliefs similar to latin rite but differ on purgatory. We call it bes purkana, house of salvation in syriac.
According to wikipedia,
The prayers specifically mentioned in the Enchiridion Indulgentiarum are not of the Latin Rite tradition alone, but also from the traditions of the Eastern Catholic Churches, such as the Akathistos, Paraklesis, Evening Prayer, and Prayer for the Faithful Departed (Byzantine), Prayer of Thanksgiving (Armenian), Prayer of the Shrine and the Lakhu Mara (Chaldean), Prayer of Incense and Prayer to Glorify Mary the Mother of God (Coptic), Prayer for the Remission of Sins and Prayer to Follow Christ (Ethiopian), Prayer for the Church, and Prayer of Leave-taking from the Altar (Maronite), and Intercessions for the Faithful Departed (Syrian).
Miserissima,
Please note that 6 paters and aves has been waived to one, though the faithfull may pray more.