I disagree. Reason must be suspended in order to believe as truth, that which cannot be proven.
Morality certainly exists outside of the Bible. Aboriginals lived
You can find meaning in friendships, children, family, education and experiences. Are you really suggesting that one can only find meaning in a God that may or may not be there?
Why ought anyone take your belief in a supernatural sky God seriously, if you cannot produce any tangible proof that your God exists?
You can find meaning in friendships, children, family, education and experiences. Are you really suggesting that one can only find meaning in a God that may or may not be there?
Human beings sure have the ability to invent subjective fantasies and values. But I thought that I made it clear that I was talking about “Objective” reality as in “truth”, as opposed to “subjective” imaginings. Not to mention that most of the values that we believe to be true, are not only rooted in religious traditions of the past, but are as such that they imply the existence of a “Universal Transcendent Moral-Reality”. But I doubt very much that you will understand such a concept, except after the burden of my teaching you very basic skills in logic. Such a feat cannot be achieved on this thread.
I think Contarini is right, that you have no basic understanding of what it means to reason let alone what we mean by a “God”. You certainly fail to grasp the difference between a “Transcendent Universal Good/Value” and mere opinions about how we want to be treated.
God, Meaning & Nihilism.
You say that we can have a society without God. But If concepts about human value helps our society to survive without invoking God as the source and foundation of those values, it is only because we believe those values to have the authority of "truth” as as much as we find value-systems to be a good survival aid. The problem, which you unfortunately fail to grasp, is that such values are not “true”, as in they do not exist objectively outside the existence of God and the fantasy of our minds and imagination; because nothing, under naturalism, can possibly exists out side of cause and effect, as in “physical-reality”. There can be no real meaning in it other then what we invent. So far as social language is concerned we are mostly laboring under a lie.
This is a fundamental flaw with atheists who use arguments which appeal to rationality and scientific empiricism. The flaw is in their reasons for disbelieving. The main reason why people are saying they don’t believe in God, is because they think that belief in God is an irrational “fantasy” as much as believing in, say, the tooth fairy. The problem with that line of thought is, so is all our values and most of our social-meanings. For example, in your mind, you think that your sons and daughters are your children and that you “ought” to love them, and that people “ought” to love their children. However, in Objective reality, without God, a child isn’t a Child; it is just a biological parasite that lives off your existence, and retains that position by fooling your nervous system into applying meaning and value to its existence. So convincing is this illusion, that you would think of “it”–the organism that is–as a child with intrinsic values. The brain then releases chemicals, telling you to love “it”; giving you a subjective moral sense of obligation. All of this happens by cause and effect and chance combined with determining environments; within a system called “Evolution”. It is this ongoing drama/fantasy which provides a vital breeding ground for nothing more then the replication of “Genes”. Hence the human fantasy that we call life, since nothing transcends the reality of cause and effect. In the real world, so far as naturalism is concerned, it gets no deeper then that.
We cannot honestly reject God under the pain of fantasy making, but then imploy fantasies just because they make us feel comfortable in a heartless purposeless world. That is quite simply hypocracy.
If we reject God, because we think he’s a fantasy, then we must, if we believe are selves to be honest rational creatures, reject all concepts of “Values” and “Humanity”, because they transcend physical truths, and therefore are just as much a fantasies as our belief in God. Unfortunately, this leads not to a fruitful future, but to absolute Nihilism.
Nobody in their right minds are going to accept Nihilism; and there is no need to. People who accept Atheism, and yet behave as if there were such things as “Objective” Values and Moral-Law, are not completely rational people. Either they’ve been deceived and have not truly thought through their position, or they have run into the darkness of denial and naturalism in the hope that it will provide them a safe haven from the obligation of prayer. But any reasonable person will realize that there is only one saving grace left for our society, and that is to accept our intuitive concept of Human Value and Moral law in so far as it points to the existence of a Transcendent, All-Powerful, Loving God. This is what I meant by the necessity of God, in so far as God is the safeguard of Objective Moral Values and Meaning.
Hence the philosophical importance of God and faith, and the Infinite-Abyss that lies in between God and fairies.
Cased closed.