B
Book_Worm
Guest
I’ve read this forum from time to time in the past, but never joined until I felt the need to seek advice on this subject. I know that this doesn’t really pertain to family relations, but one of the subsets in the heading is “advice,” so I’m posting it here.
Background: Our diocese recently completed the first phase of a capital campaign. From everything I’ve heard discussed among my Catholic friends in the diocese, the amount requested from each family was in the range of $10,000-25,000, over a four-year period. This is in addition to our parish support and the Bishop’s Annual Appeal. (I know our donation was solicited in that range; I don’t know if the upper limit was higher.) Each church will receive approximately 20% of the total donated by its parishioners if the parish meets its goal. End B/G
Last weekend we had the joy of seeing our DGS baptized. It was excruciatingly hot here, as it was across most of the country. At Mass on Saturday night, the priest announced that the air conditioning system was not functioning and that repairing it was one of the things that was on the to-do list with the funds from the capital campaign. We emailed most of the friends and relatives who had been invited to the Baptism and warned them to dress lightly.
The church was very uncomfortable during the Baptism. The overhead fans were not turned on until my DH asked to do so. Our pastor performed the Baptism, and used part of the the sermon to stress the fact that there would be another phase to the capital campaign in the fall and that anyone who had not contributed so far should do so then because the A/C system could not be repaired otherwise.
The problem? Out of the 30+ attendees at the Baptism, six were parishioners (four of whom I KNOW had already pledged). About ten were parishioners at other parishes in our diocese, there were another six from other states, several were non-Catholics, and there were also about six or eight who had left the Church, mostly with very bad feelings.
At the reception following the Baptism, I overheard several very negative comments about his remarks. There is a lot of resentment over the amount of money that has been requested; for most of my friends an amount like this would be a great sacrifice and there are still bad feelings over the amount of money our diocese has spent to compensate victims of pedophile priests. I also heard a few comments from some of the former Catholics about the Church still harping about money and how their new churches don’t do this, which led to further criticisms of church policies. The non-Catholics were polite, at least to my knowledge, and didn’t say anything.
I don’t know why Father said what he did. A simple apology for the temperature in the church with a comment that this is one of the things he for which hopes to use the funds from the capital campaign would have been fine. However, he accomplished nothing by prodding the attendees since they were not, for the most part, involved at all in his parish’s portion of the campaign.
I am not inclined to stir the pot, but I am wondering if there is a tactful way to discuss his comments with him to let him know that they had the opposite effect of what he intended. He has only been at this parish a little over two years. Yesterday’s bulletin had the results of the campaign; our parish missed its goal by more than 20%. It is the first time in my memory that it didn’t surpass the goal by 25-50%.
Speak up or keep my comments to myself?
Background: Our diocese recently completed the first phase of a capital campaign. From everything I’ve heard discussed among my Catholic friends in the diocese, the amount requested from each family was in the range of $10,000-25,000, over a four-year period. This is in addition to our parish support and the Bishop’s Annual Appeal. (I know our donation was solicited in that range; I don’t know if the upper limit was higher.) Each church will receive approximately 20% of the total donated by its parishioners if the parish meets its goal. End B/G
Last weekend we had the joy of seeing our DGS baptized. It was excruciatingly hot here, as it was across most of the country. At Mass on Saturday night, the priest announced that the air conditioning system was not functioning and that repairing it was one of the things that was on the to-do list with the funds from the capital campaign. We emailed most of the friends and relatives who had been invited to the Baptism and warned them to dress lightly.
The church was very uncomfortable during the Baptism. The overhead fans were not turned on until my DH asked to do so. Our pastor performed the Baptism, and used part of the the sermon to stress the fact that there would be another phase to the capital campaign in the fall and that anyone who had not contributed so far should do so then because the A/C system could not be repaired otherwise.
The problem? Out of the 30+ attendees at the Baptism, six were parishioners (four of whom I KNOW had already pledged). About ten were parishioners at other parishes in our diocese, there were another six from other states, several were non-Catholics, and there were also about six or eight who had left the Church, mostly with very bad feelings.
At the reception following the Baptism, I overheard several very negative comments about his remarks. There is a lot of resentment over the amount of money that has been requested; for most of my friends an amount like this would be a great sacrifice and there are still bad feelings over the amount of money our diocese has spent to compensate victims of pedophile priests. I also heard a few comments from some of the former Catholics about the Church still harping about money and how their new churches don’t do this, which led to further criticisms of church policies. The non-Catholics were polite, at least to my knowledge, and didn’t say anything.
I don’t know why Father said what he did. A simple apology for the temperature in the church with a comment that this is one of the things he for which hopes to use the funds from the capital campaign would have been fine. However, he accomplished nothing by prodding the attendees since they were not, for the most part, involved at all in his parish’s portion of the campaign.
I am not inclined to stir the pot, but I am wondering if there is a tactful way to discuss his comments with him to let him know that they had the opposite effect of what he intended. He has only been at this parish a little over two years. Yesterday’s bulletin had the results of the campaign; our parish missed its goal by more than 20%. It is the first time in my memory that it didn’t surpass the goal by 25-50%.
Speak up or keep my comments to myself?