S
Servant19
Guest
Hi Gary,Is creation ex nihilo?
Vouthon did kindly put forward some quotes which require context.
If I may provide an extract from a wonderful book called “The Eternal Quest for God” by Julio Savi which gives a pretty comprehensive overview of creation from a Baha’i perspective, and also of God, His attributes, the nature of these attributes and how they emanate into a creative reality, the nature of the “Eternal Logos” or “Promal Will” and how it is pre-existent with God but does not share “Absolute Pre-existence” with God’s Essence, etc etc.
My apologies it is lengthy, but it is important because it builds upon certain foundations which are a necessity to rationalize the theology, but feel free to scroll down to the parts that interest you.
God is the Creator: if we want to find His traces in the universe, the first issue we should try to clarify is the creational relation between Him and the universe.
A full understanding of the great mystery of creation is undoubtedly beyond the reach of any creature: it is a question which will for ever disappoint all human effort. And yet the Bahá’í texts set forth many explanations on this issue: we will try to summarize some of them. Undoubtedly others will peruse these texts with greater skill, the more so in the future when those numerous texts will become available which cannot be studied today by most Western readers because they are as yet unpublished in Western languages or even in the original text.
The world of God
God in His Essence is unknowable, inaccessible to man: we can only say that He exists, but we cannot know anything else about Him, not even what `to exist’ means for Him.
And yet, we are used to ascribe to Him names and attributes: Creator, All-Knowing, Provider, or Word, Will, Love, and so on. The meaning of this ascription of names and attributes is explained in the Bahá’í texts in two ways:
Code:The names and attributes we ascribe to God refer to what we understand of them in the world of creation. `Abdu'l-Bahá says: `Their [the attribute's] existence is proved and necessitated by the appearance of phenomena':[7] we see that the universe follows a harmonious and ordered way, and we say that God is its Ordainer; we see creatures, and we say that God is their Creator. But our understanding of these attributes is only what we have under-stood, in the plane of the world of creation, of these spiritual truths, which are far beyond our minds. This is what Western philosophers call via eminentiae.
Code:The names and attributes we ascribe to God `are only in order to deny imperfections, rather than to assert the perfections that the human mind can conceive'.[8] For example, we say that He is the Almighty, meaning that He is not powerless, as His creatures are. This is what Western philosophy calls via negationis or remotionis.
From both these explanations, we understand that man comprehends the attributes of God in his own degree of existence – the world of creation – and not in God’s degree of existence – the world of God. Bahá’u’lláh writes:...the highest praise which human tongue or pen can render are all the product of man's finite mind and are conditioned by its limitations'9 andAbdu’l-Bahá declares: `However far mind may progress, though it may reach to the final degree of comprehension, the limit of under-standing, it beholds the divine signs and attributes in the world of creation and not in the world of God.’[10]
The attributes we ascribe to God fall in the Bahá’í texts (as well as in the Islamic tradition) into two categories: essential and active attributes.[11] But, whereas in the Islamic tradition, the two categories of attributes are clearly distinguished from each other, i.e. a Divine attribute is either essential or active, in the Bahá’í texts the same attribute can be viewed as essential (i.e. in its own reality) or as active (i.e. as ex-pressed in action), depending on the plane in which it is seen.[12]
The Bahá’í texts state moreover that we understand but a faint reflection of God’s active attributes in the world, and that we cannot understand anything at all of His essential at-tributes. In fact,Abdu'l-Bahá says thatthe essential names and attributes of God are identical with His Essence…’ and sets forth a concise, rational explanation of His statement:
Code:God is absolutely preexistent, i.e. He `is not preceded by a Cause', and therefore His is `essential pre-existence'; moreover He `is without beginning', and therefore He has also `preexistence of time'..13
Code:`If the attributes are not identical with the Essence, there must also be a multiplicity of preexistences';[13]
Code:`...as Preexistence is necessary (essential), therefore the sequence of preexistence would become infinite. This is an evident error.'
Inasmuch as Divine Essence and divine essential names and attributes are one and the same thing, it follows that:
Code:God's essential names and attributes are incomprehensible as well as His Essence.[14]
Code:`As the divine entity is eternal, the divine attributes are coexistent, coeternal'[15] and `co-equal'[16] with and to Him.
Code:`...His attributes are infinite.'
Code:`...the names of God are actually and forever existent and not potential',[17] otherwise God would be imperfect.
It is therefore possible to conceive a station where only God, Who is essentially preexistent and preexistent of time, exists, with His incomprehensible,coexistent, coeternal',co-equal’,infinite',actually… existing’ essential Names and Attributes.
(cont…)Bahá’u’lláh alludes thus to such station: `He was a hidden treasure… This is a station that can never be described, not even alluded to’.[18]