B
Bahaitruth
Guest
Interesting… So it seems to be the same kind of explanation that Bahais uses to say Christianity transitioned to Islam to Bahai… (God’s progressively unfolding covenant)
But they are incorrect because Islam denies the central tenets of ChritianityInteresting… So it seems to be the same kind of explanation that Bahais uses to say Christianity transitioned to Islam to Bahai…
Isn’t one of the central tenets of Judaism that the Messiah will not be God Incarnate?But they are incorrect because Islam denies the central tenets of Chritianity
Christianity, however, does not deny the central tenets of Judaism, but rather affirms them.
Thankyou PR. I don’t see anything explicitly saying that Jesus did not atone for sins.“O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion, nor say of God aught but the truth. Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, was no more than a Messenger of God… for God is One God; glory be to Him: far exalted is He above having a son. To him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is God as a Disposer of Affairs.” (Quran 4:171)
See here also: truthnet.org/islam/Muslimchrist/introduction/
And here: "That they said (in their boast), “We killed the Messiah Isa (Jesus) son of Maryam (Mary), The Messenger of Allah”- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety They killed him not-Nay, Allah raised him up unto Himself; and Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise- Q 4:157-158.
Judaism have had many messiah’s come and go and those to come. It would appear from the midrash writings you speak from?Isn’t one of the central tenets of Judaism that the Messiah will not be God Incarnate?
.
Source for this, please?Isn’t one of the central tenets of Judaism that the Messiah will not be God Incarnate?
.
I suggest you watch this video about Islam and their rejection of the atonement.Thankyou PR. I don’t see anything explicitly saying that Jesus did not atone for sins.
I am assuming that the Sonship and eternal existence of Jesus is a critical element of His atoning of sins.
If He were not the Son of God and pre-existent, would He not have any atoning authority therefore? On what basis is that conclusion made?
With the second quote you provided, would you not conclude the possibility that the Quran is implying that Jesus OVERCAME death?
.
And, Servant, here is another thing to look at:I suggest you watch this video about Islam and their rejection of the atonement.
islamreligion.com/videos/2785/
And here is another source which documents Islam’s rejection of the atoning death of Christ:And, Servant, here is another thing to look at:
islamreligion.com/articles/630/viewall/
It’s called “The Historical Fallacy of Atonement”
Any Muslim sitting on a throne like that has got it all wrongI suggest you watch this video about Islam and their rejection of the atonement.
islamreligion.com/videos/2785/
Well can you show me one Jewish source that says that the Messiah WILL be God Incarnate?Source for this, please?
.Thankyou PR. I don’t see anything explicitly saying that Jesus did not atone for sins.
I am assuming that the Sonship and eternal existence of Jesus is a critical element of His atoning of sins.
If He were not the Son of God and pre-existent, would He not have any atoning authority therefore? On what basis is that conclusion made?
With the second quote you provided, would you not conclude the possibility that the Quran is implying that Jesus OVERCAME death?
.
Is this not your claim that one of the central tenets of Judaism is that God cannot become Incarnate?Well can you show me one Jewish source that says that the Messiah WILL be God Incarnate?
.
So, you need to provide your source.Isn’t one of the central tenets of Judaism that the Messiah will not be God Incarnate?
If Jesus didn’t really die, how is it that you believe Islam professes that Jesus paid for our sins?Thankyou PR. I don’t see anything explicitly saying that Jesus did not atone for sins.
I am assuming that the Sonship and eternal existence of Jesus is a critical element of His atoning of sins.
If He were not the Son of God and pre-existent, would He not have any atoning authority therefore? On what basis is that conclusion made?
With the second quote you provided, would you not conclude the possibility that the Quran is implying that Jesus OVERCAME death?
.
This is where the biggest differences arise between so many Faiths.If Jesus didn’t really die, how is it that you believe Islam professes that Jesus paid for our sins?
Hi PR, it is my understanding that Scripture, especially prophetic Scripture, talks about what the prophecy IS, not what it isn’t…Is this not your claim that one of the central tenets of Judaism is that God cannot become Incarnate?
Is this not your post right here:
So, you need to provide your source.
In the Book of Jeremiah, it states the Messiah will be a political leader and a judge who makes virtuous decisions. He will also be well-versed in and observant of Jewish Law according to Isaiah. There is no explicit mention of the Messiah, however, in the Torah portion of the Hebrew Bible. It is the Oral Law (Talmud), also believed to be given by G-d to Moses at Mount Sinai, that discusses the attributes of the Messiah and the Messianic age in more detail. The term as used in the Hebrew Bible means the anointed one as is applicable to a king, but it does not translate as savior.Hi PR, it is my understanding that Scripture, especially prophetic Scripture, talks about what the prophecy IS, not what it isn’t…
So the OT does not say that the Messiah will not have brown eyes, will not have blonde hair, will not be from the family line of Noah, will not be a boat maker, will not be God Incarnate.
My source was actually Meltzerboy, maybe he can chip in and clarify?
.
Absolutely BahaitruthDear Servant19,
I would just add that as we (Baha’is) believe in the truth of Judaism, we also believe in the truth of Christianity, with especial emphasis on the Catholic Church. Bahaullah addresses the Pope first among the Rulers in the Suriy-i-Haykal.
So although Metzelboy is correct about messiah, we embrace Jesus Christ as taught in the New Testament and through the Pope, because of God’s Covenant and Progressive Revelation…
(This is why it says Baha’is are to Islam, Judaism, and Christianity, what Christians are to Judaism. )