S
Sam_777
Guest
Isa Almisry please free up some PM space, I want to PM you something.
Wow, thanks Sam_777, that was a very good website. I appreciate you posting it.Sorry to post such things, but you have to know the pre-Islamic history on why this stone became black:
“In the book of “the legendary in quran” , page 16,17 it said:{ that nudeness was for a reason, as there were sexual worshiping rituals taking place inside that Makkahin godly house in the ancient epochs }
In the book of" the father of prophets Ibrahim", by Muhammad hosny abdul-hammid, published in Cairo, page 92, he said:{ there was a pagan ritual performed by women, as they were touching the black stone by their menstrual blood, as the menstrual blood for the ancient pagan was the secret of birth, as they believed that, woman gives the blood and man gives the semen and the spirit is given by god They were assimilating the first act done by the moon god (Alh) when he slept with the sun god (Alat) So they were celebrating that occasion as the gods (the moon and the sun) did before, they were doing the same thing again (See also" the legendary and the heritage" by Sayed Al-Kemny, page 160,162.”
English Source:
fatherzakaria.net/books/qaf/pdf/58-Episode.pdf
RIGHT ومن تلك الطقوس ما يثير الاندهاش، ففي (كتاب أبو الأنبياء إبراهيم الخليل. تأليف محمد حسني عبد الحميد نشر دار السعادة القاهرة ص 92) يقول: إن الحجر الأسود كان أبيضَ، لكنه اسود من مس الحيض في الجاهلية"!
(5) وجاء تعلقيا على هذه الرواية الإسلامية في (كتاب الأسطورة في القرآن ص 17و19) "أي أنه كان هناك طقس لدى الجاهليين تؤديه النساء في الحَجَر، وهو مس الحجر الأسود بدماء الحيض، ودماء الحيض بالذات!!! وقد كان دم الحيض عند المرأة في اعتقاد الأقدمين هو سر الميلاد، فمن المرأة الدم، ومن الرجل المَنِيُّ، ومن الإله الروح … إنهم يماثلون الفعل الأول الذي قام به … إله القمر عندما جامع الشمس الإلهة إلات].
7ـ وجاء في (كتاب الملل والنحل لأبي القاسم الشهرستاني ص 247) طقس كان يمارس وهو الاحتكاك بالحجر الأسود.
8ـ وقد قلنا في حلقة سابقة أن كلمة حج] مأخوذة أصلا من فعل الاحتكاك، فهي في أصلها من ح ك] مع الأخذ في الاعتبار هيئة الحجر الأسود وشكله. (في كتاب الأسطورة في القرآن ص 17و19)
[/RIGHT]
Arabic Source:
islamexplained.com/Default.aspx?tabid=256
I hope we get answer for this Youtube video from my fellow Muslims.
youtube.com/watch?v=xDQreJp9iFY
I think you meant the Papal Bulls Sublimus Dei (May 2, 1537) and the Romanus Pontifex (January 8, 1455).
Yes indeed I did!
Romanus Pontifex was written in January 8, 1455 by Pope Nicholas V to King Afonso V of Portugal. As a follow-up to the Dum Diversas (June 18, 1452), it extended to the Catholic nations of Europe dominion over discovered lands during the Age of Discovery. Along with sanctifying the seizure of non-Christian lands, it encouraged the enslavement of native, non-Christian peoples in Africa and the New World.
Yes, indeed it did.
However, Paul III in Sublimus Dei unequivocally declares the indigenous peoples of the Americas to be rational beings with souls, denouncing any idea to the contrary as directly inspired by the “enemy of the human race”. He goes on to condemn their reduction to slavery in the strongest terms, declaring it null and void for as well as for any people known or that could be discovered in the future, entitles their right to liberty and property, and concludes with a call for their evangelization.
How very nice for the Church to FINALLY do such a humane thing as this, and put an end to their ways before this document came about. You do realize the connection in TIME when this occured, since you followed my OLG thread…
The bull had a strong impact on the Valladolid debate, and its principles eventually became the official position of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor and King of Spain, although it was often ignored by the colonists and conquistadores themselves.
I’m not aware that they are considered to be part of “People of the Book”, according to our Islamic teaching, the People of the Book are only Jews & Christians, as explained in these links:Sam_777, why did the Qur’an refer the Sabians as part of the group in the “People of the Book”? Aren’t People of the Book group supposedly monotheists?
Many Muslims give me different answers. Since you can think outside of the box (unlike some here), i’d like to read your perspective on this.
Yes they are:I’m not aware that they are considered to be part of “People of the Book”, according to our Islamic teaching, the People of the Book are only Jews & Christians, as explained in these links:
(E) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_of_the_Book
(A) islamtoday.net/pen/show_question_content.cfm?id=7674
5:69Sabians**Pooya/Ali Commentary **5:69](http://www.al-islam.org/quran/defau...bic=on&tshakir=on&talicommentary=on&wrapat=70)**Shakir **
"I saw the prophet when I was a pagan. He was saying to the people, ‘if you want to save yourselves, accept that there is no God but Allah’ At this moment I noticed a man behind him saying ‘he is a sabi.’ When I asked somebody who he was he told me he was ‘Abu Lahab, his uncle." ****(96)****Both ‘Ibn Jurayi (d. 767) and ‘Ata ‘ibn Abi Rabah (d.732) wrote:**"I saw the prophet when I was a pagan. He was saying to the people, ‘if you want to save yourselves, accept that there is no God but Allah’ At this moment I noticed a man behind him saying ‘he is a sabi.’ When I asked somebody who he was he told me he was ‘Abu Lahab, his uncle’ Of the relationship between the Sabians who lived in Sawad (in Iraq ) and Mohammed it is mention that the polytheists of Mecca were heard to say of Mohammed “he has become a Sabian.” **(97)Rabi’ah ‘ibn ‘Ubbad (who lived at the same time as Mohammed) wrote:
Being mentioned in Quran doesn’t mean that they are considered to be with the People of the Book! even if they worship one God or are good people, get back to my Arabic reference for more details, its more accurate.Yes they are:
But they are, my friend. Originally, People of the Book also included the Sabians, alongside Jews and Christians. Some Muslims nowadays also include the Sikhs as part of that group.Being mentioned in Quran doesn’t mean that they are considered to be with the People of the Book! even if they worship one God or are good people, get back to my Arabic reference for more details, its more accurate.
You should get your information from Arabic Muslim cleric, not from ordinary Muslims, the Arabic link I provided mention clearly that the Sabians are not included in the people of the book, even though they are good people and have many good deeds, but when it comes to the Islamic dogma its diffrent, for example when a Muslim man wants to marry from the people of the book, he can marry only from either the Jews or the Christians exclusively.But they are, my friend. Originally, People of the Book also included the Sabians, alongside Jews and Christians. Some Muslims nowadays also include the Sikhs as part of that group.
I totally agree with you. In fact, it was a Muslim cleric who told me about the Sabians (as part of the People of the Book). The subject came about when he asked me why i wanted to learn more about Islam and told him about my Brahminical roots. This was several years ago. In 1995 i believe, as i was still doing my National Service back then.You should get your information from Arabic Muslim cleric, not from ordinary Muslims, the Arabic link I provided mention clearly that the Sabians are not included in the people of the book, even though they are good people and have many good deeds, but when it comes to the Islamic dogma its diffrent, for example when a Muslim man wants to marry from the people of the book, he can marry only from either the Jews or the Christians exclusively.
Sam_777, I almost came to tears over your words. And especially this, ‘WHY I SHED TEARS WHEN I HEAR JESUS WORDS, WHAT MAKES MY SOUL SO ATTRACTED TO THOSE WORDS!. WHY WHY WHY !!!’I’m not aware that they are considered to be part of “People of the Book”, according to our Islamic teaching, the People of the Book are only Jews & Christians, as explained in these links:
(E) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_of_the_Book
(A) islamtoday.net/pen/show_question_content.cfm?id=7674