Having said that, I can find nothing in the official or “urban dictionary” definitions of a “date” that imply it is not a date when there is no sex. No one I know who is actually young thinks that asking someone on a “date” implies that there has to be sex. Maybe that one might fairly expect to be asked, but on the other hand they tell me one might expect to be asked at any time the opportunity seems to present itself. Total strangers in bars will make “social advances” that imply an immediate interest in sex, so no “date” is necessary for that! Letting someone “take you on a date” when you have zero interest in anything but a platonic friendship, however, is apparently rude. If you have no interest, you’re supposed to say “let’s just be friends” right up front.
If someone says they went on a date with a member of the opposite sex, it only implies that they had a social outing in which exploration of the possibility of a romance was on the table. Sex is not implied, but true openness to a romantic relationship is apparently implied. Dates never used to be so serious as that! In the old days, a first date is what some would now call a “pre-date.” (Life has gotten so complicated, oy vey.)
Even in secular circles, as it turns out, it has become very important for people to officially hold to the position that sex is never “implied” and that there is never a time in which anyone is entitled to a “yes” to sex.
Even the pagans and the atheists believe this now! Good grief, anyone these days who acts as if he or she is entitled to demand sex is practically branded as a sex offender. A belief to the contrary is very much out of vogue. Well, the world hasn’t gone entirely to h#$l in a handbasket, at least there is that.