W
WillPhillips
Guest
Do you want to reconsider that claim before you assert it so absolutely? It’s trivial to refute it. Ready?
From the catechism:
1033 To die in mortal sin without repenting and accepting God’s merciful love means remaining separated from him for ever by our own free choice. This state of definitive self-exclusion from communion with God and the blessed is called “hell.”
1035 The teaching of the Church affirms the existence of hell and its eternity. Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, "eternal fire."617 The chief punishment of hell is eternal separation from God, in whom alone man can possess the life and happiness for which he was created and for which he longs.
1036 The affirmations of Sacred Scripture and the teachings of the Church on the subject of hell are a call to the responsibility incumbent upon man to make use of his freedom in view of his eternal destiny.
V. THE LAST JUDGMENT
1038 The resurrection of all the dead, “of both the just and the unjust,” will precede the Last Judgment. This will be “the hour when all who are in the tombs will hear [the Son of man’s] voice and come forth, those who have done good, to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil, to the resurrection of judgment.” … And [those who have done evil] will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life."
Trivial to refute? Read it again. I’d say the catechism you quote here backs up my claim. There is no support from the Church for NON-REDEMPTIVE PUNISHMENT. If you can show me a quote or papal support for such an idea, I’m all ears. (Self-professed Catholics believe many non-theologically consistent things, as I’m sure you’re aware…this idea of hell/punishment is one of them)