Do protestants believe Catholics can't go to heaven?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Valley_Lily
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Choy,

My observation of the organizations you mentioned do come across that their basic foundation is anti-Catholicism. Same with American sects coming out in the 1800’s. Without us, they would have lost alot of steam.
yes, well, most sects and even cults seek out poorly catechized people and lure them into their “faith” by pointing out the wrong things they see about the Catholic Church. its pretty convincing to those who are under-educated about the faith they hold. sad that some people go through live believing in something they don’t quite understand. i always say, faith doesn’t have to be blind.
 
=Annabelle Marie;6609082]Maybe off topic–and maybe you can help me with this JonNC…
I’ll try.
In most of the Protestant churches I went to…we considered Lutheran’s to be different…not Catholic but not Protestant…is that correct? It seems like you have views very different then lets say Assembly of God, Church of Christ, Baptist…I only say that because those are a few that I went to before.
Probably so. We are a sacramental church, some other Protestants are, many are not. But that has an effect on how we view things, and how we are viewed. I think one will find that the closer a denomination is to the reformation, the more teachings and practices of the Catholic Church remain - liturgy, sacraments, creeds, etc. The way we worship, what we believe, teach, and profess, will seem very different to Baptists, or Nazarenes, etc.
I’ve read a few of your post where you seem insulted with people post about Protestant and I’ve never understood it because I’ve always thought of Lutherans as different.
.
Gosh, I’m not sure what you mean here. 😦
Remember that this is a Catholic forum, and Catholics view Lutherans as Protestant, so when the generalized “this is what Protestants believe - do - say…” comes up, I’m often quick to point out the problem with general statements, and I don’t want folks left with the notion that “Lutherans don’t Baptize infants”, for example.
Not that I know all that much about them but am catching up in a few good discussions with some friends that are Lutheran.
Hope that helps. As a start, one can read Luther’s Small Catechism, and the Augsburg Confession to see what Lutherans confess.
www.bookofconcord.org

Jon
 
Remember that this is a Catholic forum, and Catholics view Lutherans as Protestant, so when the generalized “this is what Protestants believe - do - say…” comes up, I’m often quick to point out the problem with general statements, and I don’t want folks left with the notion that “Lutherans don’t Baptize infants”, for example./QUOTE]

Well then I apoligize…when I talk about my experience in the Protestant churches…what I really mean then is Protestant churches minus Lutherans…because I’ve always considered them to be more closely aligned to the Catholic Church…with some key differences.

Thanks 👍
 
Something I always wondered. I know the catechism teaches that even those who wholeheartedly follow Christ in a non-Catholic church can be saved, but I was wondering what sort of opinion protestants held in the other direction.
Traditionally, both Protestants and Catholics were at best dubious about each other’s salvation, though Catholics were if anything more emphatic about the damnation of Protestants than vice versa (you could afford to be–for Protestants to say that Catholics couldn’t be saved raised the difficult question: “what about medieval Christians?”). For most folks on both sides that has changed dramatically in the past couple centuries. Official Catholic teaching still requires you to put more qualifications around your belief in Protestants’ salvation than Protestants need to do on their side. Many Protestants think it’s quite simple–Catholics are just another variety of Christian. However, because Protestants do not have a unified hierarchy, there is huge diversity among Protestants on this as on many other issues. Catholics who want to say that all Protestants are going to hell have the Magisterium to reckon with. Protestants who say that Catholics are going to hell typically think many other Protestants aren’t “true Christians” either, so are not going to be interested in what moderate Protestants have to say.

Thus, it’s true that you can certainly find significant sectors of the Protestant population, particularly in the southern United States (and of course Northern Ireland and some similar Protestant bastions), who still believe that Catholics have abandoned the essentials of the Faith and cannot be saved as long as they believe all the teachings of the Catholic Church.

Since these folks are not only clustered in particular regions, but very noisy wherever they are found, it is easy for Catholics living within shouting distance of them to think that they are representative of Protestants as a whole.

A further wrinkle to consider: evangelical Protestants tend to think of salvation in very individualistic terms, and to define a “Christian” as someone who is truly “saved”–who has a living faith in Christ, which evangelicals tend to think of as a more or less permanent state (some believe in “eternal security” and some do not, but even those who do not tend to assume that you won’t bob in and out of a state of grace on a regular basis). Evangelical Protestants believe strongly that no set of doctrines and no institutional affiliation can save you, so the more conservative ones often express strong concerns about whether “nominal Christians” are “real Christians” or not. Quite naturally, evangelical Protestants generally disagree quite strongly with many Catholic teachings, especially with regard to salvation, and for both theological and sociological reasons (in other words, Catholicism casts a “wide net” and doesn’t practice church discipline very strictly by conservative Protestant standards) they conclude that there are many “nominal Christians” in the Catholic Church. It’s important to realize that they think there are such people in *every *church. It’s just that a “gathered church” of people who have all made an adult profession of faith and who hold one another accountable is naturally less likely to have people whose faith is nominal or lukewarm, and furthermore that, in the view of most evangelical Protestants, Catholic teaching about salvation tends to be fuzzy at best.

Hence, many evangelicals will say things like “Catholics can be Christians,” sometimes in a rather hesitant tone. It’s important to understand that by “Christians” they mean (in Catholic language) “in a state of grace.” There is nothing offensive to Catholics in the claim that many Catholics are not in a state of grace. Obviously Catholics will disagree with the idea that Catholic doctrine regarding salvation is at fault, but many Catholics are quick to agree that Catholic evangelization of the baptized is often at serious fault.

The problem is that when Protestants say “of course Catholics *can *be Christians” they may mean either
  1. Catholicism, like every other church, has people within it who are not in a state of grace–probably a higher percentage on the whole than a vibrant evangelical church will have; or
  2. Catholicism’s doctrines lead to damnation, but there might be people who manage to ignore or downplay the false teaching and who truly believe in Jesus even though they remain within the Catholic Church.
Furthermore, in a climate saturated by centuries of hostility between Catholics and Protestants, it’s easy for these two views to slide into each other. I think it would be hard to say which of these two things my family believed as I was growing up. We certainly tended to disagree with our fundamentalist friends when they made sweeping claims about Catholics not being Christians. But we did tend to assume that “true Christians” in the Catholic Church were likely to be rather unorthodox by Catholic standards. That being said, my family believed that institutional churches in general tended to take people away from Jesus, so we didn’t just single out Catholics in this regard:o

Edwin
 
Nope, not baseless, just pay attention on Sunday, you’ll see it with your own eyes if you pay attention.
Why do you assume that Amateur Pianist goes to the same kind of church you went to?

Edwin
 
Traditionally, both Protestants and Catholics were at best dubious about each other’s salvation, though Catholics were if anything more emphatic about the damnation of Protestants than vice versa (you could afford to be–for Protestants to say that Catholics couldn’t be saved raised the difficult question: “what about medieval Christians?”). For most folks on both sides that has changed dramatically in the past couple centuries. Official Catholic teaching still requires you to put more qualifications around your belief in Protestants’ salvation than Protestants need to do on their side. Many Protestants think it’s quite simple–Catholics are just another variety of Christian. However, because Protestants do not have a unified hierarchy, there is huge diversity among Protestants on this as on many other issues. Catholics who want to say that all Protestants are going to hell have the Magisterium to reckon with. Protestants who say that Catholics are going to hell typically think many other Protestants aren’t “true Christians” either, so are not going to be interested in what moderate Protestants have to say.

Thus, it’s true that you can certainly find significant sectors of the Protestant population, particularly in the southern United States (and of course Northern Ireland and some similar Protestant bastions), who still believe that Catholics have abandoned the essentials of the Faith and cannot be saved as long as they believe all the teachings of the Catholic Church.

Since these folks are not only clustered in particular regions, but very noisy wherever they are found, it is easy for Catholics living within shouting distance of them to think that they are representative of Protestants as a whole.

A further wrinkle to consider: evangelical Protestants tend to think of salvation in very individualistic terms, and to define a “Christian” as someone who is truly “saved”–who has a living faith in Christ, which evangelicals tend to think of as a more or less permanent state (some believe in “eternal security” and some do not, but even those who do not tend to assume that you won’t bob in and out of a state of grace on a regular basis). Evangelical Protestants believe strongly that no set of doctrines and no institutional affiliation can save you, so the more conservative ones often express strong concerns about whether “nominal Christians” are “real Christians” or not. Quite naturally, evangelical Protestants generally disagree quite strongly with many Catholic teachings, especially with regard to salvation, and for both theological and sociological reasons (in other words, Catholicism casts a “wide net” and doesn’t practice church discipline very strictly by conservative Protestant standards) they conclude that there are many “nominal Christians” in the Catholic Church. It’s important to realize that they think there are such people in *every *church. It’s just that a “gathered church” of people who have all made an adult profession of faith and who hold one another accountable is naturally less likely to have people whose faith is nominal or lukewarm, and furthermore that, in the view of most evangelical Protestants, Catholic teaching about salvation tends to be fuzzy at best.

Hence, many evangelicals will say things like “Catholics can be Christians,” sometimes in a rather hesitant tone. It’s important to understand that by “Christians” they mean (in Catholic language) “in a state of grace.” There is nothing offensive to Catholics in the claim that many Catholics are not in a state of grace. Obviously Catholics will disagree with the idea that Catholic doctrine regarding salvation is at fault, but many Catholics are quick to agree that Catholic evangelization of the baptized is often at serious fault.

The problem is that when Protestants say “of course Catholics *can *be Christians” they may mean either
  1. Catholicism, like every other church, has people within it who are not in a state of grace–probably a higher percentage on the whole than a vibrant evangelical church will have; or
  2. Catholicism’s doctrines lead to damnation, but there might be people who manage to ignore or downplay the false teaching and who truly believe in Jesus even though they remain within the Catholic Church.
Furthermore, in a climate saturated by centuries of hostility between Catholics and Protestants, it’s easy for these two views to slide into each other. I think it would be hard to say which of these two things my family believed as I was growing up. We certainly tended to disagree with our fundamentalist friends when they made sweeping claims about Catholics not being Christians. But we did tend to assume that “true Christians” in the Catholic Church were likely to be rather unorthodox by Catholic standards. That being said, my family believed that institutional churches in general tended to take people away from Jesus, so we didn’t just single out Catholics in this regard:o

Edwin
Friend Edwin,

I think you summed it up nicely. I liked your statement about “no set of doctrines and no institutional affiliation can save you” is almost a “Quaker statement”…only God through the mercy of Christ can save any one…whether some Friends would express themselves in quite the same way as you so eloquently did is not an issue with most Friends…a “Christian” is someone who lives as a Christian…to not live as a “Christian” is to be NOT a Christian as true salvation continues with sanctification and living a holy life…doctrine doesn’t make one holy…and for Friends neither do rituals…living a holy life makes one holy is how more “evanglical” Friends would state it…but God alone is Judge and Redeemer.
 
Friend Edwin,

I think you summed it up nicely. I liked your statement about “no set of doctrines and no institutional affiliation can save you” is almost a “Quaker statement”…only God through the mercy of Christ can save any one…whether some Friends would express themselves in quite the same way as you so eloquently did is not an issue with most Friends…a “Christian” is someone who lives as a Christian…to not live as a “Christian” is to be NOT a Christian as true salvation continues with sanctification and living a holy life…doctrine doesn’t make one holy…and for Friends neither do rituals…living a holy life makes one holy is how more “evanglical” Friends would state it…but God alone is Judge and Redeemer.
I think this is a statemtn that ANY Christian of any denomination can agree with. the end, it won’t matter what church you went to, what sacraments you took, if you believed in the authority of the Pope, or what songs you sang, if the way you worshiped was not done with the intention of selflessness and trusting in God for all things.
 
JonNC;6611949:
Remember that this is a Catholic forum, and Catholics view Lutherans as Protestant, so when the generalized “this is what Protestants believe - do - say…” comes up, I’m often quick to point out the problem with general statements, and I don’t want folks left with the notion that “Lutherans don’t Baptize infants”, for example./QUOTE]

Well then I apoligize…when I talk about my experience in the Protestant churches…what I really mean then is Protestant churches minus Lutherans…because I’ve always considered them to be more closely aligned to the Catholic Church…with some key differences.

Thanks 👍
Hi Annabelle Marie-

Thanks for your setting us Lutherans to the side so to speak. Whenever my Roman friends, I never refer to them as catholic since in my view we all belong to the catholic church, call me a Protestant, I like to tell them, “I am not a Protestant, I’m a Reformer.” After all, no matter who you talk to, everyone, ever the Orthodox, refer to it as the Reformation and not the big Protest.

This sort of reminds me a funny story of how people classify themselves. When I was growing up in a Lutheran grade school, we had a couple of kids from the Roman Church, a couple of Jews, and a smattering of other denominations. Now at some point, like first grade, we all seem to have the epiphany that there were different religions. So the question went around the playground, “What religion are you?” Most of us, including the other “protestants”, answered Christian, the Jewish kids said they were Jewish, but when you asked the Roman kids, “What religion are you?”, they always said Catholic. And we asked again, not really getting what they were saying, they again answered Catholic. We would ask, if they were Christians and they would say no, they were Catholic. We would ask if that meant they were Jewish and they answered again that they were Catholic.

Finally, a few of us on Sunday went up to Pastor and told him what we were hearing and trying to figure out what they were talking about about, because if they weren’t Christians and they weren’t Jews what exactly was this Catholic. That is when Pastor told us that there were lots of religions, but sometimes there were differences between groups in religions. We didn’t quite get it. He then told us, Christianity is like a banana split. In Christianity you have different groups, Lutherans, Roman Catholics, Episcopalians, but in the end it’s all a part of Christianity. A banana split has vanilla, chocolate and strawberry ice cream, but in the end it’s just one banana split.
 
Sorry guys, but this brings up another story.

My grandmother grew up in rural western Pennsylvania. The small town she was from had two churches, a Methodist church and Roman Catholic church. Well, there was a bad wind storm and it took the steeple right off of the Methodist church sending the bell right through the church roof. The parishioners of the Roman church pointed to this as divine retribution for their sinful nature and of course their being separated from salvation and the one true Church. Now mind you this was very rural and very small and everyone knew everyone’s business. Everyone new that the priest at the parish church had a “special relationship” with one of his parishioners. A couple of years later during one winter, the priest had gone out to meet his “friend”. Unfortunately, he left the heater on and it ended up burning the church down. This time the finger pointing went the other direction as to divine retribution for the Roman churches lack of charity.

My own personal answer to the question posed by this thread is: it doesn’t matter what I think or what protestants think or what Roman Catholics think about who gets into heaven. When it comes down to it, it’s not my decision. I believe it was Fr. Richard Rohr who said something along the lines of, it’s not my responsibility to figure out who and who isn’t worthy to get into heaven or who is and who isn’t saved, what is my responsibility is how do I answer Christ’s call in the Gospel and how do I live out His message of love and peace.
 
Sorry guys, but this brings up another story.

My grandmother grew up in rural western Pennsylvania. The small town she was from had two churches, a Methodist church and Roman Catholic church. Well, there was a bad wind storm and it took the steeple right off of the Methodist church sending the bell right through the church roof. The parishioners of the Roman church pointed to this as divine retribution for their sinful nature and of course their being separated from salvation and the one true Church. Now mind you this was very rural and very small and everyone knew everyone’s business. Everyone new that the priest at the parish church had a “special relationship” with one of his parishioners. A couple of years later during one winter, the priest had gone out to meet his “friend”. Unfortunately, he left the heater on and it ended up burning the church down. This time the finger pointing went the other direction as to divine retribution for the Roman churches lack of charity.

My own personal answer to the question posed by this thread is: it doesn’t matter what I think or what protestants think or what Roman Catholics think about who gets into heaven. When it comes down to it, it’s not my decision. I believe it was Fr. Richard Rohr who said something along the lines of, it’s not my responsibility to figure out who and who isn’t worthy to get into heaven or who is and who isn’t saved, what is my responsibility is how do I answer Christ’s call in the Gospel and how do I live out His message of love and peace.
take care of one’s own house, eh?
 
Mikeoffaith;6612613 said:
“I am not a Protestant, I’m a Reformer.”

After all, no matter who you talk to, everyone, ever the Orthodox, refer to it as the Reformation and not the big Protest.

I often say I’m a reformationist, not a Protestant. It seems to me the difference is that, for a reformationist, the reformation is neither over nor successful until there is reconciliation with, primarily, the Bishop of Rome. A reformationist should never be comfortable with the current schism.

Jon
 
I often say I’m a reformationist, not a Protestant. It seems to me the difference is that, for a reformationist, the reformation is neither over nor successful until there is reconciliation with, primarily, the Bishop of Rome. A reformationist should never be comfortable with the current schism.

Jon
this got me curious

so you mean to say you want the Catholic Church to accept the changes proposed by Luther, and then unite the Lutheran and Catholic Churches? thats the aim or desire of a Reformationist?
 
this got me curious

so you mean to say you want the Catholic Church to accept the changes proposed by Luther, and then unite the Lutheran and Catholic Churches? thats the aim or desire of a Reformationist?
Not necessarily. I think the Holy Spirit can lead us to a common understanding of Truth. I think the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification is an example of this (there are others). Its not complete, but its a start. Reconciliation is not going to come as a capitulation by one side to another.

Jon
 
It’s obvious that there are many on both the protestant and catholic side that lack the full knowledge of the teachings of their sects, besides, there are so many different protestant denominations that have different believes. It’s hard to believe that G-d will punish us with eternal damnation because we were confused about exactly what he meant in every verse of the bible.

I have to assume that when you ask a question like “Do Protestants believe Catholics can’t go to heaven?” you are only doing so to cause debate and not to really find the answer. I can make the answer easy. Some protestants believe that all catholic will go to hell and the catholic church is the whore of Babylon, some believe that some Catholics will get lucky and only believe in the important teachings and reject the faults, thus obtaining salvation, and yet some more believe that the importance lies in loving Jesus and keeping G-d’s commandments and therefore being catholic would not alone keep you from heaven. Unfortunately even though the catechesis is clear on how the church teaches, many Catholics hold similarly differing opinions.

I am not a relativist; however, these verses seem to be hard to be taken out of context.

Mark 3:14-25

Romans 2:13-16
 
Though, as an Assemblies of God member, I am within the conservative evangelical category, I definitely expect to see substantial numbers of Catholics and Orthodox in heaven. If you’re a true follower of Christ, regardless of what earthly church you belong to, you’ll be there. Of course, that also means that some Protestants we might expect to see there, won’t make it!
 
What I am is a true believer in Jesus Christ. I worship God in whatever Church I am in. The name on the door isn’t going to mean a thing if you do not have Jesus in your heart. We are going to be judged on how we have lived our life, not what church we attended.
 
I would agree with the statements in the Catechism that the destiny of hell awaits those who freely choose to reject God right through until final impentience. I personally don’t think your denominational badge will condemn or save you, but God gives all people (regardless of time and place) the grace necessary for salvation. Whether you choose to accept or reject that, rather than your denominational badge, plus what you have done with your life (I don’t believe the murderer will get a free ticket to heaven just because they have faith in Jesus) will be what counts.
 
take care of one’s own house, eh?
Yes sort of. A wise man said to me, why should I worry about cleaning another man’s house when my own house is a wreck. I think it goes along the lines of the splinter/log deal.
 
Yes sort of. A wise man said to me, why should I worry about cleaning another man’s house when my own house is a wreck. I think it goes along the lines of the splinter/log deal.
Or, in the case of Lutherans. Don’t be criticizin’ Olga’s hotdish unless your own is complimented by the pastor, jah, you betcha.
 
Evangelical Protestants believe strongly that no set of doctrines and no institutional affiliation can save you, so the more conservative ones often express strong concerns about whether “nominal Christians” are “real Christians” or not.
Edwin-

Are you meaning evangelical in the sense of fundamentalist? I think the two have become intertwined and in my book are two very different animals.

Mike
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top