J
joe370
Guest
Wow fordhamstudent, awesome post!Most contemporary Protestant scholars today assert that the solas of the Reformation are oversimplifications of complex theological and biblical issues regarding soteriology. Sola Scriptura is indefensible today since it rejects the source of the Scriptures, namely the Catholic Church who compiled and canonized the texts, and it is not supportable by modern Protestant biblical scholarship who has clearly shown that the text of the New Testament with all of its variants and scribal and redactor errors, cannot be the foundation of Protestantism. Sola Christe is unsupportable since it rejects the Church Christ founded as the vehicle for salvation and is a denial of the promise of Christ that the gates of hades will not prevail against the Church. Sola fide and gratia are indefensible since they deny that the believer can become “perfect as the Father is perfect” as the Scriptures attest. Fundamentally, private judgment–a Protestant notion–has only created division instead of unity and confusion instead of clarity of truth.
Luther’s primary problem is he universalized Augustinian theology as being the primary theological paradigm of the Catholic Church, when he neglected to realize and differentiate between the Germanic and Augustinian Catholicism he experienced and the various expressions of Catholic faith in the other religious orders, other national expressions, and did not even consider that one could hold to Eastern Christian views in the Church united to Rome. The Reformers had tunnel vision and collapsed within their limited perspective on the Catholic Church and only judged the Church based on their experience of a localized and national Catholic expression. We however, are called to be in dialogue with the children of the Reformers since the Council and we should hold them with esteem, love, and respect. The children of error should not be punished because of their parents.