B
BrianH
Guest
Some. I’ve encountered folks who believe the Spirit has led them to all Truth.
And where is this corrected? If this is a Catholic i would answer “see CCC…” or “his bishop”. But where is this corrected in protestantism?Some. I’ve encountered folks who believe the Spirit has led them to all Truth.
Shocking!Some. I’ve encountered folks who believe the Spirit has led them to all Truth.
I guess I’m confused; are you saying protestants don’t change their mind? I can assure you I’ve met plenty who have, and I have as well on various things.Greetings Kliska,
Ive never met a protestant who, at a given time when there beliefs differ from another protestants belief and confusion to others was evident, would conclude their own beliefs were inferior to anothers nor have i heard of any protestant denomination teaching this paradigm.
Peace!!!
It usually wouldn’t be in the same sense that Catholics would use the word, however.Protestants I’ve spoken with see Scripture as infallible too.
I’ve gone 'round this bend before on the forum, I’ll just say I don’t think that applies to the OP’s question, and leave it at that.But either way, how do you know that the Letter to the Hebrews belongs in the bible?
We believe that men, even those who lead the church, can and have erred. While I’m sure it’s convenient for Catholics to think Protestants must believe themselves infallible since they deny that the Catholic Church is infallible, it’s not true.I’m reading (The Catholic doctrine of the Eucharist: demonstrably proved from scripture, from tradition, ) and on page 52 link it says –
In effect, every Protestant is placed in this dilemma: if he do not believe himself infallible, he has no certainty for his faith; if he believes himself infallible, each of his judgements must appear to him a ray of increased intelligence. He ought, according to the remark of Bossuet, to "deem all his thoughts to be emanations of the Deity; an intellectual pantheism which directly leads to the other.
Protestants and Catholics, whats your opinion?
I have an assurance of my own salvation. (I also believe that salvation can be forfeited,
I did not mean to imply that but please point to a preaching, sermon, or creed that states something to the effect of - “…and be aware that some of these beliefs we teach could be wrong, we are just not absolutely sure”.I guess I’m confused; are you saying protestants don’t change their mind? I can assure you I’ve met plenty who have, and I have as well on various things.
I’m pretty sure there wouldn’t be something like that in a creed, that would kinda defeat the purpose of a creed.I did not mean to imply that but please point to a preaching, sermon, or creed that states something to the effect of - “…and be aware that some of these beliefs we teach could be wrong, we are just not absolutely sure”.
Peace!!!
Very good point Kliska, perhaps that is one reason we bring Bibles to church, often the minister asks everyone to turn to a specific passage. For a moment, you can hear the pages rustle. By turning to the passage, one can mark the spot for future reference. Often the minister will invite feedback during the coming week if anyone has a question or wants elaboration on the message. There have been times when the next Sunday the minister will mention that someone pointed out something interesting in relation to his message that he had not thought of or that draws a parallel in another passage that is worth sharing![/It’s also common in Protestant circles to underscore the need to search scripture to test what someone is teaching; meaning, the preacher tells the congregation to double check his teaching with scripture.
Good point Kliska. I have heard often pastors reminding their congregations not to believe their teaching just because they’re speaking from a pulpit but to search the Scriptures for themselves. In effect, God will hold the preacher accountable for what he preaches, but the people themselves are still responsible for verifying the scriptural truth of any teacher’s claims.I’m pretty sure there wouldn’t be something like that in a creed, that would kinda defeat the purpose of a creed.However, I have witnessed several preachers in several sermons make changes if they feel they’ve erred, and point out those errors. It’s also common in Protestant circles to underscore the need to search scripture to test what someone is teaching; meaning, the preacher tells the congregation to double check his teaching with scripture.
Most protestants seem to view each person’s conscience as being infallible for that person. You are guided by the “inner witness of the spirit”, which basically means do whatever your conscience will justify.
You should always obey your conscience. This is affirmed by St. Thomas Aquinas. You do have a duty to inform your conscience. But if you really and truly believe something to be right you should do it. Likewise if you really and truly believe something to be wrong you shouldn’t do it. Only the individual and God truly know what his conscience is telling him.*"…to go against conscience is neither right nor safe. "
~Luther*
Protestant staple.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=GPg0wBP5k6MI’m pretty sure there wouldn’t be something like that in a creed,
Thanks for that.
That’s something I’ve always wondered about, why have a preacher when you can and should read and study scripture for yourself? The preacher is superfluous.Good point Kliska. I have heard often pastors reminding their congregations not to believe their teaching just because they’re speaking from a pulpit but to search the Scriptures for themselves. In effect, God will hold the preacher accountable for what he preaches, but the people themselves are still responsible for verifying the scriptural truth of any teacher’s claims.
I wouldn’t say superfluous because there’s a good chance he’s been to seminary and is at least somewhat familar with Koine Greek, etc. So he’s more learned than all or most of the congregation overall in the field.That’s something I’ve always wondered about, why have a preacher when you can and should read and study scripture for yourself? The preacher is superfluous.
Catholics can and should read and study scripture for yourselves as well, as both the modern CC and the ECF’s testify to.That’s something I’ve always wondered about, why have a preacher when you can and should read and study scripture for yourself? The preacher is superfluous.
So this means we therefore can defer our understanding of scripture to someone who we presume is better equipped (been to seminary, smarter, more likely to be right than we are, etc). In any event, it seems most Protestants in actual practice do defer to someone, a pastor or preacher, that they find especially convincing or gifted in eloquence.Catholics can and should read and study scripture for yourselves as well, as both the modern CC and the ECF’s testify to.But seriously, similar to the Catholic idea of a magisterium and the guidance of the Spirit, and the gifts of the Spirit, most protestants believe that certain pastors, preachers, teachers, apologists, etc… can be truly gifted by God in those areas. One of the ways to “test all things and hold to that which is true/good” is to hold up a teaching to the light of scripture and pray and seek the Spirit’s guidance. Also as Lenten Ashes has stated, many pastors have been to seminary, and can also read and speak Hebrew and Greek.