Do women need access to contraceptives?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jasonmccarley
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m guessing you missed where I said:

“I get it that this is not why Mrs. Gates was pleging the money to help” (referring to the medical benefits that can be provided by the pill. In my case I’m greatful for the pill because it has actually given me the chance to get pregnant again. If I hadn’t had the pill, they would have had to have done a hysterectomy years ago. Even with tens of thousands of dollars of tests and surgeries, they still couldn’t figure out why ever since I began having a period I would bleed so hard or so long - to thepoint of needing to get transfusions - so we’re not just talking some ‘extra cramps’ (which I roll my eyes about when I see a male comment on - saying - oh she’s just taking it because she’s got a little heavy bleeding or has an extra cramp or two…I honestly believe that if most men could experience two hours of any woman having a bad period, they’d be crying and begging God to make them not have to endure the pain - won’t even go into when I hear or read about their comments regarding natural child birth!)
My one big point was this, there are women out there for whom the Church o.k.s the use of birth control - and there are those of us who need it for other reasons than to keep from getting pregnant. Honestly, I wish I had never needed to take it, but it has been the best way to keep me with all the parts necessary to be able to have a child. Please pray that in the next year or so, I’ll get the o.k. to try to carry again and be successful. Just please, even though I agree the majority of women use it as a form of birth control, please remember there are quite a few of us out here who respect ourselves, our bodies and yet do still use the pill. Yes there are risks - I know of no medications that don’t come with at lest a page or two of risks and possible side effects. Please don’t assume that because a woman (married or not) takes the pill or another form of ABC that she automatically sins - so to me the question of do women need access to contraceptives is a big YES!
God Bless
Rye
My wife and daughters actually use the pill for regulation and such. And this is prescribed by a VERY PRO-LIFE DOCTOR. Very big in the PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT. If this doctor decides it is OK for my wife and daughters to use this then I believe this doctor. Very active in the Catholic Church too.

AP
 
My wife and daughters actually use the pill for regulation and such. And this is prescribed by a VERY PRO-LIFE DOCTOR. Very big in the PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT. If this doctor decides it is OK for my wife and daughters to use this then I believe this doctor. Very active in the Catholic Church too.

AP
👍
 
I have a lot of admiration for Melinda Gates. With all of her money, she could spend it on the latest fashions, luxury yachts, etc. Instead, she chooses to help the poor in Africa. I’m sure that none of us are qualified to declare that we know the state of her soul. She seems more saintly to me than a lot of people.

I would like to point out that encyclicals such as Humane Vitae are addressed to married couples.

It is my understanding that a lot of twelve-year-old girls in Africa get pregnant because of rape. Their bodies are not ready to support a pregnancy, and some of them end up with their internal organs damaged to the point that they leak blood all of the time. Even though these girls are raped through no fault of their own, they can get shunned by their families if they get pregnant. They can get pregnant again and again.

I read somewhere years ago that a group of nuns were on the pill because of a grave danger of being raped. If that was morally okay, why wouldn’t it be okay to give pills or shots to these girls? Unmarried women have no obligation at all to rapists, and the medical risks from pills or shots might be less than the dangers from the atrocious lives these girls will lead if they keep getting pregnant.

I also think it would be very good if these women had lessons on how to use Natural Family Planning. However, it won’t do them any good at all if the men won’t leave them alone.

I also agree with Ryecroft about medical use of the pill. If men had to endure these terrible cramps for five minutes, these problems would have been solved years ago.
Finding it very hard to disagree with anything in this post. I think pregnancy, childbirth, infant mortality and everything associated with it in some of these areas is almost beyond our understanding here in the west. Just as an example, think about the safe birth kits that some countries put together to send to developing countries - they cost a few dollars and contain a plastic sheet, some soap, a pair of gloves, string or cord to use to tie the umbilical cord, and a clean blade to cut the cord. How many of us could fathom having a child year after year under the conditions that must exist for those kits to be needed?
 
  1. Her pledge does take her out of communion with the Church and she will go to hell if she doesn’t change and go to confession.
  2. I’m afraid she will take a bunch of people to hell with her.
  3. Women need to live according to the laws of the Church which excludes contraceptives.
Your comment about her going to hell is despicable and you are in no position to judge her.
 
What you find offensive does not matter at all. What matters is that the use and promotion of contraceptives are an offense against God. It is clear beyond any doubts that by promotion of contraceptives Gate is going against the dogmatic teachings of the Catholic Church. Doing so is a mortal sin. The teachings of the Catholic Church on moral sin is very clear - those who knowingly engage in mortal sin and who do not seek forgiveness are going to go to Hell. We do not judge Gates ourselves. However, according to the most basic teachings of the Catholic Church through her own actions Gates is seeking Hell.

Ran
I suppose by your “thinking” the same logic applies to the overwhelming majority of Catholic women who use some form of artificial birth control.
 
Those who argue for so-called “same-sex marriage” only talk about the infertile heterosexual couples as if infertility is the norm among heterosexuals. But these are the same ones that argue that all women (apparently even the infertile ones) need access to contraceptives. 🤷
 
Those who argue for so-called “same-sex marriage” only talk about the infertile heterosexual couples as if infertility is the norm among heterosexuals. But these are the same ones that argue that all women (apparently even the infertile ones) need access to contraceptives. 🤷
It is an argument that gay marriage advocates question, if marriage is about procreation, why do we allow heterosexual infertile couples, senior citizens who can not conceive get married? Heterosexual couples, even if they do not intend to have children, have biological complementarity. Gay couples can not have biological procreative sexual union even if their sexual organs function properly. Aspect of the sex union that makes a couple suitable for marriage is the potential for procreation. Children have been born from couples who thought they were infertile
 
What you find offensive does not matter at all. What matters is that the use and promotion of contraceptives are an offense against God. It is clear beyond any doubts that by promotion of contraceptives Gate is going against the dogmatic teachings of the Catholic Church. Doing so is a mortal sin. The teachings of the Catholic Church on moral sin is very clear - those who knowingly engage in mortal sin and who do not seek forgiveness are going to go to Hell. We do not judge Gates ourselves. However, according to the most basic teachings of the Catholic Church through her own actions Gates is seeking Hell.

Ran
I’m sure God will be so happy that He no longer has to judge since You have made an argument which you believe allows you to decide Mrs. Gates and others’ fate’s of their souls…glad to know you can see into the human heart - I’m sure God will be happy to know He has an understudy who can discern all circumstances of someone’s actions… “Judge not lest Ye be judged…” (Matthew 7:1) better stop looking for the plank in Melinda’s eye and check your own.
God Bless
Rye
 
Good question. Indeed, do women *need *access to contraceptives? Let’s look at this. Would they die without contraceptives? Would their quality of life be in any way diminished without contraceptives? I think not. If the goal is to not have children, then they can always refrain from having sex. Otherwise, we go from “needing” contraceptives to “wanting” them. “Need”, in the true sense of the word, doesn’t apply to this topic.
 
Good question. Indeed, do women *need *access to contraceptives? Let’s look at this. Would they die without contraceptives? Would their quality of life be in any way diminished without contraceptives? I think not. If the goal is to not have children, then they can always refrain from having sex. Otherwise, we go from “needing” contraceptives to “wanting” them. “Need”, in the true sense of the word, doesn’t apply to this topic.
Actually, some of us do need them - those contraceptives that you think I just “want” can keep me from bleeding out at times - so on whole, no most won’t kill over without them but they actually allow some of us to continue on AND have the possibility of having more childrent later. And I’ve also got to say, there are MANY women out there who have been told by their doctors that they should NOT get pregnant again or it could cause them to die. For many, contraceptives allow them to still enjoy intimacy with their husbands without having the constant fear - yes, I know it’s not 100% but for those that are serious about needing to take it every day, at the same time, without fail because their life could depend upon it, yes they are necessary to them as well.
God Bless
Rye
 
Women don’t need access to contraceptives!!! They need access to a world where they are treated properly as person to love and care for. Contraception has not created equality among the sexes, it has given men a license to use them for sexual pleasure. If they have a just reason to avoid pregnancy, they always have the option of Natural Family Planning. I pray God blesses you as you read this post.
 
sigh… most of us live in the real world.
“Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.” Romans 12:2

“Don’t love the world or anything that belongs to the world. If you love the world, you cannot love the Father. Our foolish pride comes from this world, and so do our selfish desires and our desire to have everything we see. None of this comes from the Father. The world and the desires it causes are disappearing. But if we obey God, we will live forever.” 1 John 2:15-17
 
Actually, some of us do need them - those contraceptives that you think I just “want” can keep me from bleeding out at times - so on whole, no most won’t kill over without them but they actually allow some of us to continue on AND have the possibility of having more childrent later. And I’ve also got to say, there are MANY women out there who have been told by their doctors that they should NOT get pregnant again or it could cause them to die. For many, contraceptives allow them to still enjoy intimacy with their husbands without having the constant fear - yes, I know it’s not 100% but for those that are serious about needing to take it every day, at the same time, without fail because their life could depend upon it, yes they are necessary to them as well.
God Bless
Rye
Indeed, I understand some people actually do *need *them in the true sense of the word. This is not the reason Gates is promoting them, however. She is promoting them as a means to prevent conception. That is the whole point of this entire thread. The context of my previous post was with regards to using contraceptives for their originally intended purpose, not alternative uses such as the ones you describe.
 
Indeed, I understand some people actually do *need *them in the true sense of the word. This is not the reason Gates is promoting them, however. She is promoting them as a means to prevent conception. That is the whole point of this entire thread. The context of my previous post was with regards to using contraceptives for their originally intended purpose, not alternative uses such as the ones you describe.
Well the question on the forum was “Do women need access to contraceptives” So to me that meant - do women ever need contraceptives- need being the key word here - and honestly even as a form of birth control, I believe it had it’s place. My great aunt had 8 kids in 7 years - no one taught them about spacing children - she was worn out - she told her husband ‘no more- i’m done!’ she was worn out and tired and as she told one of our relatives ‘sick of being pregnant all the time’ - She would have jumped at having a way to not get pregnant anymore…and guess how she died - with her 9th pregnancy. She would have had a much longer life if there had been contraceptives. Of course I understand that things were different back then but still - there are still places on Earth where women have kids from the time they have their first period until they drop dead, (some I bet are happy to get away from this Earth where it’s a never ending series of pregnancies and births) I just don’t believe that women should have to go through that. And the truth is that the approved method of spacing births by the Church does not work for all women. I wish it did.
God Bless
Rye
 
Well the question on the forum was “Do women need access to contraceptives” So to me that meant - do women ever need contraceptives- need being the key word here - and honestly even as a form of birth control, I believe it had it’s place. My great aunt had 8 kids in 7 years - no one taught them about spacing children - she was worn out - she told her husband ‘no more- i’m done!’ she was worn out and tired and as she told one of our relatives ‘sick of being pregnant all the time’ - She would have jumped at having a way to not get pregnant anymore…and guess how she died - with her 9th pregnancy. She would have had a much longer life if there had been contraceptives. Of course I understand that things were different back then but still - there are still places on Earth where women have kids from the time they have their first period until they drop dead, (some I bet are happy to get away from this Earth where it’s a never ending series of pregnancies and births) I just don’t believe that women should have to go through that. And the truth is that the approved method of spacing births by the Church does not work for all women. I wish it did.
God Bless
Rye
Are these women being forced to have sex? If so, then what they need is to be freed from their rapists, not the provision of free carcinogens. If not, then they don’t really “need” them, as sex isn’t something of which one must partake in order to survive and/or have a decent life. If NFP doesn’t work and you don’t want more children, how about not having sex? You don’t need contraceptives to not have sex, only a modicum of self control. Again, we’re talking true needs here, not wants and not “I’d be nice ifs”.
 
Are these women being forced to have sex? If so, then what they need is to be freed from their rapists, not the provision of free carcinogens. If not, then they don’t really “need” them, as sex isn’t something of which one must partake in order to survive and/or have a decent life. If NFP doesn’t work and you don’t want more children, how about not having sex? You don’t need contraceptives to not have sex, only a modicum of self control. Again, we’re talking true needs here, not wants and not “I’d be nice ifs”.
In some cultures and especially at the turn of the century it was almost unheard of to deny your husband your ‘womanly duties’ - and yes that’s the way it still is in some places - but for us in America, yeah, stopping sex because NFP won’t work I’m sure will make for some wonderfully happy marriages - it’s easy to say "just don’t have sex anymore or until you hit menopause’ but realistically if you want to have a good, loving marriage, then making love is part of that recipie. ( And you asked if thier ‘quality of life’ would be diminished at all? in certain circumstances yes - especially if you believe the quality of a marriage impacts her quality of life) I know there are times when that’s no longer physically possible for reasons - but to have to deny your husband for years because you don’t want or don’t feel you should have any more children - that’s just not realistic. That’s not what I belive God intended marriage to be - but I also don’t believe that he intended wives to have to become a constant, miserable, exhausted baby making machine (and yes this does still happen in countries). I realize that isn’t the norm in America any longer or in many developed countries - but I have a lot of trouble believing in a God who would force a choice like that on women and I know of quite a few Priests and even some Bishops who would agree.
God Bless
Rye
 
In some cultures and especially at the turn of the century it was almost unheard of to deny your husband your ‘womanly duties’ - and yes that’s the way it still is in some places
Then in such cases, what women “need” is to be free from coercion. Not access to chemicals.
…] but for us in America, yeah, stopping sex because NFP won’t work I’m sure will make for some wonderfully happy marriages - it’s easy to say "just don’t have sex anymore or until you hit menopause’ but realistically if you want to have a good, loving marriage, then making love is part of that recipie.
Again, let’s focus on the word “need”. You don’t need contraceptives, even if we consider what you just said. This is still a “want”. One doesn’t need to be married or have sex. You may want to, for sure. But you don’t need it.
( And you asked if thier ‘quality of life’ would be diminished at all? in certain circumstances yes - especially if you believe the quality of a marriage impacts her quality of life) I know there are times when that’s no longer physically possible for reasons - but to have to deny your husband for years because you don’t want or don’t feel you should have any more children - that’s just not realistic.
You still have not explained how this makes it a “need”. It’s a want, a wish. You say “it’s not realistic not to have sex” but that’s just desires talking. There is no need to have sex or be married at all. I’m not saying this will make your marriage awesome or that it won’t be tough or that it’s in any way desirable. I’m arguing that what you’re talking about does not equate to a need. Pandering to emotions does not change this fact.
…] I also don’t believe that he intended wives to have to become a constant, miserable, exhausted baby making machine (and yes this does still happen in countries).
As I said before, the solution to this is justice, not drugs. You’re attacking a symptom and not the problem. If women are treated like sex dolls and baby mills, it’s because of the culture and the views regarding the status of women. Not because she doesn’t have access to artificial birth control.
…] I know of quite a few Priests and even some Bishops who would agree.
This is pretty scary. We don’t need schismatic bishops and priests teaching things that are contrary to Church doctrine. Such people are not in communion with the Church and really oughtn’t be continuing in their positions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top